Phrenic Nerve Injury During Cryoballoon-Based Pulmonary Vein Isolation: Results of the Worldwide YETI Registry

  • Christian-H Heeger
  • Christian Sohns
  • Alexander Pott
  • Andreas Metzner
  • Osamu Inaba
  • Florian Straube
  • Malte Kuniss
  • Arash Aryana
  • Shinsuke Miyazaki
  • Serkan Cay
  • Joachim R Ehrlich
  • Ibrahim El-Battrawy
  • Martin Martinek
  • Ardan M Saguner
  • Verena Tscholl
  • Kivanc Yalin
  • Evgeny Lyan
  • Wilber Su
  • Giorgi Papiashvili
  • Maichel Sobhy Naguib Botros
  • Alessio Gasperetti
  • Riccardo Proietti
  • Erik Wissner
  • Daniel Scherr
  • Masashi Kamioka
  • Hisaki Makimoto
  • Tsuyoshi Urushida
  • Tolga Aksu
  • Julian K R Chun
  • Kudret Aytemir
  • Ewa Jędrzejczyk-Patej
  • Karl-Heinz Kuck
  • Tillman Dahme
  • Daniel Steven
  • Philipp Sommer
  • Roland Richard Tilz

Related Research units

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cryoballoon-based pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has emerged as an effective treatment for atrial fibrillation. The most frequent complication during cryoballoon-based PVI is phrenic nerve injury (PNI). However, data on PNI are scarce.

METHODS: The YETI registry is a retrospective, multicenter, and multinational registry evaluating the incidence, characteristics, prognostic factors for PNI recovery and follow-up data of patients with PNI during cryoballoon-based PVI. Experienced electrophysiological centers were invited to participate. All patients with PNI during CB2 or third (CB3) and fourth-generation cryoballoon (CB4)-based PVI were eligible.

RESULTS: A total of 17 356 patients underwent cryoballoon-based PVI in 33 centers from 10 countries. A total of 731 (4.2%) patients experienced PNI. The mean time to PNI was 127.7±50.4 seconds, and the mean temperature at the time of PNI was -49±8°C. At the end of the procedure, PNI recovered in 394/731 patients (53.9%). Recovery of PNI at 12 months of follow-up was found in 97.0% of patients (682/703, with 28 patients lost to follow-up). A total of 16/703 (2.3%) reported symptomatic PNI. Only 0.06% of the overall population showed symptomatic and permanent PNI. Prognostic factors improving PNI recovery are immediate stop at PNI by double-stop technique and utilization of a bonus-freeze protocol. Age, cryoballoon temperature at PNI, and compound motor action potential amplitude loss >30% were identified as factors decreasing PNI recovery. Based on these parameters, a score was calculated. The YETI score has a numerical value that will directly represent the probability of a specific patient of recovering from PNI within 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of PNI during cryoballoon-based PVI was 4.2%. Overall 97% of PNI recovered within 12 months. Symptomatic and permanent PNI is exceedingly rare in patients after cryoballoon-based PVI. The YETI score estimates the prognosis after iatrogenic cryoballoon-derived PNI. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03645577. Graphic Abstract: A graphic abstract is available for this article.

Bibliographical data

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere010516
ISSN1941-3149
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.2022
PubMed 34962134