Perioperative goal-directed therapy: A systematic review without meta-analysis
Standard
Perioperative goal-directed therapy: A systematic review without meta-analysis. / Kaufmann, Thomas; Clement, Ramon P; Scheeren, Thomas W L; Saugel, Bernd; Keus, Frederik; van der Horst, Iwan C C.
In: ACTA ANAESTH SCAND, Vol. 62, No. 10, 11.2018, p. 1340-1355.Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journal › SCORING: Review article › Research
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Perioperative goal-directed therapy: A systematic review without meta-analysis
AU - Kaufmann, Thomas
AU - Clement, Ramon P
AU - Scheeren, Thomas W L
AU - Saugel, Bernd
AU - Keus, Frederik
AU - van der Horst, Iwan C C
N1 - © 2018 The Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2018/11
Y1 - 2018/11
N2 - BACKGROUND: Perioperative goal-directed therapy aims to optimise haemodynamics by titrating fluids, vasopressors and/or inotropes to predefined haemodynamic targets. Perioperative goal-directed therapy is a complex intervention composed of several independent component interventions. Trials on perioperative goal-directed therapy show conflicting results. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the benefits and harms of perioperative goal-directed therapy.METHODS: PubMED, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Library were searched. Trials were included if they had a perioperative goal-directed therapy protocol. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. The first secondary outcome was serious adverse events excluding mortality. Risk of bias was assessed, and GRADE was used to evaluate quality of evidence.RESULTS: One hundred and twelve randomised trials were included of which one trial (1%) had low risk of bias. Included trials varied in patients: types of surgery which was expected due to inclusion criteria; in intervention and comparison: timing of intervention, monitoring devices, haemodynamic variables, target values, use of fluids, vasopressors and/or inotropes as well as combinations of these within protocols; and in outcome: mortality was reported in 87 trials (78%). Due to substantial clinical heterogeneity also within the various types of surgery a meta-analysis of data, including subgroup analyses, as defined in our protocol was considered inappropriate.CONCLUSION: Clinical heterogeneity in patients, interventions and outcomes in perioperative goal-directed therapy trials is too large to perform meta-analysis on all trials. Future trials and meta-analyses highly depend on universally agreed definitions on aspects beyond type of surgery of the complex intervention and its evaluation.
AB - BACKGROUND: Perioperative goal-directed therapy aims to optimise haemodynamics by titrating fluids, vasopressors and/or inotropes to predefined haemodynamic targets. Perioperative goal-directed therapy is a complex intervention composed of several independent component interventions. Trials on perioperative goal-directed therapy show conflicting results. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the benefits and harms of perioperative goal-directed therapy.METHODS: PubMED, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Library were searched. Trials were included if they had a perioperative goal-directed therapy protocol. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. The first secondary outcome was serious adverse events excluding mortality. Risk of bias was assessed, and GRADE was used to evaluate quality of evidence.RESULTS: One hundred and twelve randomised trials were included of which one trial (1%) had low risk of bias. Included trials varied in patients: types of surgery which was expected due to inclusion criteria; in intervention and comparison: timing of intervention, monitoring devices, haemodynamic variables, target values, use of fluids, vasopressors and/or inotropes as well as combinations of these within protocols; and in outcome: mortality was reported in 87 trials (78%). Due to substantial clinical heterogeneity also within the various types of surgery a meta-analysis of data, including subgroup analyses, as defined in our protocol was considered inappropriate.CONCLUSION: Clinical heterogeneity in patients, interventions and outcomes in perioperative goal-directed therapy trials is too large to perform meta-analysis on all trials. Future trials and meta-analyses highly depend on universally agreed definitions on aspects beyond type of surgery of the complex intervention and its evaluation.
KW - Journal Article
KW - Review
KW - Fluid Therapy
KW - Perioperative Care
KW - Monitoring, Physiologic
KW - Humans
KW - Hemodynamics
KW - Outcome Assessment, Health Care
U2 - 10.1111/aas.13212
DO - 10.1111/aas.13212
M3 - SCORING: Review article
C2 - 29978454
VL - 62
SP - 1340
EP - 1355
JO - ACTA ANAESTH SCAND
JF - ACTA ANAESTH SCAND
SN - 0001-5172
IS - 10
ER -