Perioperative goal-directed therapy: A systematic review without meta-analysis

Standard

Perioperative goal-directed therapy: A systematic review without meta-analysis. / Kaufmann, Thomas; Clement, Ramon P; Scheeren, Thomas W L; Saugel, Bernd; Keus, Frederik; van der Horst, Iwan C C.

In: ACTA ANAESTH SCAND, Vol. 62, No. 10, 11.2018, p. 1340-1355.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Review articleResearch

Harvard

Kaufmann, T, Clement, RP, Scheeren, TWL, Saugel, B, Keus, F & van der Horst, ICC 2018, 'Perioperative goal-directed therapy: A systematic review without meta-analysis', ACTA ANAESTH SCAND, vol. 62, no. 10, pp. 1340-1355. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.13212

APA

Kaufmann, T., Clement, R. P., Scheeren, T. W. L., Saugel, B., Keus, F., & van der Horst, I. C. C. (2018). Perioperative goal-directed therapy: A systematic review without meta-analysis. ACTA ANAESTH SCAND, 62(10), 1340-1355. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.13212

Vancouver

Kaufmann T, Clement RP, Scheeren TWL, Saugel B, Keus F, van der Horst ICC. Perioperative goal-directed therapy: A systematic review without meta-analysis. ACTA ANAESTH SCAND. 2018 Nov;62(10):1340-1355. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.13212

Bibtex

@article{0b68e9e76a1041389c200250a2c215aa,
title = "Perioperative goal-directed therapy: A systematic review without meta-analysis",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Perioperative goal-directed therapy aims to optimise haemodynamics by titrating fluids, vasopressors and/or inotropes to predefined haemodynamic targets. Perioperative goal-directed therapy is a complex intervention composed of several independent component interventions. Trials on perioperative goal-directed therapy show conflicting results. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the benefits and harms of perioperative goal-directed therapy.METHODS: PubMED, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Library were searched. Trials were included if they had a perioperative goal-directed therapy protocol. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. The first secondary outcome was serious adverse events excluding mortality. Risk of bias was assessed, and GRADE was used to evaluate quality of evidence.RESULTS: One hundred and twelve randomised trials were included of which one trial (1%) had low risk of bias. Included trials varied in patients: types of surgery which was expected due to inclusion criteria; in intervention and comparison: timing of intervention, monitoring devices, haemodynamic variables, target values, use of fluids, vasopressors and/or inotropes as well as combinations of these within protocols; and in outcome: mortality was reported in 87 trials (78%). Due to substantial clinical heterogeneity also within the various types of surgery a meta-analysis of data, including subgroup analyses, as defined in our protocol was considered inappropriate.CONCLUSION: Clinical heterogeneity in patients, interventions and outcomes in perioperative goal-directed therapy trials is too large to perform meta-analysis on all trials. Future trials and meta-analyses highly depend on universally agreed definitions on aspects beyond type of surgery of the complex intervention and its evaluation.",
keywords = "Journal Article, Review, Fluid Therapy, Perioperative Care, Monitoring, Physiologic, Humans, Hemodynamics, Outcome Assessment, Health Care",
author = "Thomas Kaufmann and Clement, {Ramon P} and Scheeren, {Thomas W L} and Bernd Saugel and Frederik Keus and {van der Horst}, {Iwan C C}",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2018 The Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.",
year = "2018",
month = nov,
doi = "10.1111/aas.13212",
language = "English",
volume = "62",
pages = "1340--1355",
journal = "ACTA ANAESTH SCAND",
issn = "0001-5172",
publisher = "Blackwell Munksgaard",
number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perioperative goal-directed therapy: A systematic review without meta-analysis

AU - Kaufmann, Thomas

AU - Clement, Ramon P

AU - Scheeren, Thomas W L

AU - Saugel, Bernd

AU - Keus, Frederik

AU - van der Horst, Iwan C C

N1 - © 2018 The Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

PY - 2018/11

Y1 - 2018/11

N2 - BACKGROUND: Perioperative goal-directed therapy aims to optimise haemodynamics by titrating fluids, vasopressors and/or inotropes to predefined haemodynamic targets. Perioperative goal-directed therapy is a complex intervention composed of several independent component interventions. Trials on perioperative goal-directed therapy show conflicting results. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the benefits and harms of perioperative goal-directed therapy.METHODS: PubMED, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Library were searched. Trials were included if they had a perioperative goal-directed therapy protocol. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. The first secondary outcome was serious adverse events excluding mortality. Risk of bias was assessed, and GRADE was used to evaluate quality of evidence.RESULTS: One hundred and twelve randomised trials were included of which one trial (1%) had low risk of bias. Included trials varied in patients: types of surgery which was expected due to inclusion criteria; in intervention and comparison: timing of intervention, monitoring devices, haemodynamic variables, target values, use of fluids, vasopressors and/or inotropes as well as combinations of these within protocols; and in outcome: mortality was reported in 87 trials (78%). Due to substantial clinical heterogeneity also within the various types of surgery a meta-analysis of data, including subgroup analyses, as defined in our protocol was considered inappropriate.CONCLUSION: Clinical heterogeneity in patients, interventions and outcomes in perioperative goal-directed therapy trials is too large to perform meta-analysis on all trials. Future trials and meta-analyses highly depend on universally agreed definitions on aspects beyond type of surgery of the complex intervention and its evaluation.

AB - BACKGROUND: Perioperative goal-directed therapy aims to optimise haemodynamics by titrating fluids, vasopressors and/or inotropes to predefined haemodynamic targets. Perioperative goal-directed therapy is a complex intervention composed of several independent component interventions. Trials on perioperative goal-directed therapy show conflicting results. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the benefits and harms of perioperative goal-directed therapy.METHODS: PubMED, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Library were searched. Trials were included if they had a perioperative goal-directed therapy protocol. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. The first secondary outcome was serious adverse events excluding mortality. Risk of bias was assessed, and GRADE was used to evaluate quality of evidence.RESULTS: One hundred and twelve randomised trials were included of which one trial (1%) had low risk of bias. Included trials varied in patients: types of surgery which was expected due to inclusion criteria; in intervention and comparison: timing of intervention, monitoring devices, haemodynamic variables, target values, use of fluids, vasopressors and/or inotropes as well as combinations of these within protocols; and in outcome: mortality was reported in 87 trials (78%). Due to substantial clinical heterogeneity also within the various types of surgery a meta-analysis of data, including subgroup analyses, as defined in our protocol was considered inappropriate.CONCLUSION: Clinical heterogeneity in patients, interventions and outcomes in perioperative goal-directed therapy trials is too large to perform meta-analysis on all trials. Future trials and meta-analyses highly depend on universally agreed definitions on aspects beyond type of surgery of the complex intervention and its evaluation.

KW - Journal Article

KW - Review

KW - Fluid Therapy

KW - Perioperative Care

KW - Monitoring, Physiologic

KW - Humans

KW - Hemodynamics

KW - Outcome Assessment, Health Care

U2 - 10.1111/aas.13212

DO - 10.1111/aas.13212

M3 - SCORING: Review article

C2 - 29978454

VL - 62

SP - 1340

EP - 1355

JO - ACTA ANAESTH SCAND

JF - ACTA ANAESTH SCAND

SN - 0001-5172

IS - 10

ER -