Peri-operative allogeneic blood transfusion does not adversely affect oncological outcomes after radical cystectomy for urinary bladder cancer

Standard

Peri-operative allogeneic blood transfusion does not adversely affect oncological outcomes after radical cystectomy for urinary bladder cancer. / PROMETRICS 2011 study group.

In: BJU INT, Vol. 121, No. 1, 01.2018, p. 101-110.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{c4c0677cda204229ad34d436634d1138,
title = "Peri-operative allogeneic blood transfusion does not adversely affect oncological outcomes after radical cystectomy for urinary bladder cancer",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of peri-operative blood transfusion (PBT) on recurrence-free survival, overall survival, cancer-specific mortality and other-cause mortality in patients undergoing radical cystectomy (RC), using a contemporary European multicentre cohort.PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Prospective Multicentre Radical Cystectomy Series (PROMETRICS) includes data on 679 patients who underwent RC at 18 European tertiary care centres in 2011. The association between PBT and oncological survival outcomes was assessed using Kaplan-Meier, Cox regression and competing-risks analyses. Imbalances in clinicopathological features between patients receiving PBT vs those not receiving PBT were mitigated using conventional multivariable adjusting as well as inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW).RESULTS: Overall, 611 patients had complete information on PBT, and 315 (51.6%) received PBT. The two groups (PBT vs no PBT) differed significantly with respect to most clinicopathological features, including peri-operative blood loss: median (interquartile range [IQR]) 1000 (600-1500) mL vs 500 (400-800) mL (P < 0.001). Independent predictors of receipt of PBT in multivariable logistic regression analysis were female gender (odds ratio [OR] 5.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.62-9.71; P < 0.001), body mass index (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.87-0.95; P < 0.001), type of urinary diversion (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.18-0.82; P = 0.013), blood loss (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.23-1.40; P < 0.001), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (OR 2.62, 95% CI 1.37-5.00; P = 0.004), and ≥pT3 tumours (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.02-2.48; P = 0.041). In 531 patients with complete data on survival outcomes, unweighted and unadjusted survival analyses showed worse overall survival, cancer-specific mortality and other-cause mortality rates for patients receiving PBT(P < 0.001, P = 0.017 and P = 0.001, respectively). After IPTW adjustment, those differences no longer held true. PBT was not associated with recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.92, 95% CI 0.53-1.58; P = 0.8), overall survival (HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.55-2.05; P = 0.9), cancer-specific mortality (sub-HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.62-1.92; P = 0.8) and other-cause mortality (sub-HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.26-3.85; P > 0.9) in IPTW-adjusted Cox regression and competing-risks analyses. The same held true in conventional multivariable Cox and competing-risks analyses, where PBT could not be confirmed as a predictor of any given endpoint (all P values >0.05).CONCLUSION: The present results did not show an adverse effect of PBT on oncological outcomes after adjusting for baseline differences in patient characteristics.",
keywords = "Journal Article, Multivariate Analysis, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Tertiary Care Centers, Risk Assessment, Europe, Humans, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Proportional Hazards Models, Male, Treatment Outcome, Cause of Death, Disease-Free Survival, Propensity Score, Blood Transfusion, Autologous/adverse effects, Analysis of Variance, Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/mortality, Perioperative Care/methods, Cystectomy/methods, Survival Analysis, Female, Cohort Studies, Databases, Factual",
author = "Vetterlein, {Malte W} and Philipp Gild and Kluth, {Luis A} and Thomas Seisen and Michael Gierth and Hans-Martin Fritsche and Maximilian Burger and Chris Protzel and Hakenberg, {Oliver W} and {von Landenberg}, Nicolas and Florian Roghmann and Joachim Noldus and Philipp Nuhn and Armin Pycha and Michael Rink and Chun, {Felix K-H} and Matthias May and Margit Fisch and Atiqullah Aziz and {PROMETRICS 2011 study group}",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2017 The Authors BJU International {\textcopyright} 2017 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.",
year = "2018",
month = jan,
doi = "10.1111/bju.14012",
language = "English",
volume = "121",
pages = "101--110",
journal = "BJU INT",
issn = "1464-4096",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Peri-operative allogeneic blood transfusion does not adversely affect oncological outcomes after radical cystectomy for urinary bladder cancer

AU - Vetterlein, Malte W

AU - Gild, Philipp

AU - Kluth, Luis A

AU - Seisen, Thomas

AU - Gierth, Michael

AU - Fritsche, Hans-Martin

AU - Burger, Maximilian

AU - Protzel, Chris

AU - Hakenberg, Oliver W

AU - von Landenberg, Nicolas

AU - Roghmann, Florian

AU - Noldus, Joachim

AU - Nuhn, Philipp

AU - Pycha, Armin

AU - Rink, Michael

AU - Chun, Felix K-H

AU - May, Matthias

AU - Fisch, Margit

AU - Aziz, Atiqullah

AU - PROMETRICS 2011 study group

N1 - © 2017 The Authors BJU International © 2017 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

PY - 2018/1

Y1 - 2018/1

N2 - OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of peri-operative blood transfusion (PBT) on recurrence-free survival, overall survival, cancer-specific mortality and other-cause mortality in patients undergoing radical cystectomy (RC), using a contemporary European multicentre cohort.PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Prospective Multicentre Radical Cystectomy Series (PROMETRICS) includes data on 679 patients who underwent RC at 18 European tertiary care centres in 2011. The association between PBT and oncological survival outcomes was assessed using Kaplan-Meier, Cox regression and competing-risks analyses. Imbalances in clinicopathological features between patients receiving PBT vs those not receiving PBT were mitigated using conventional multivariable adjusting as well as inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW).RESULTS: Overall, 611 patients had complete information on PBT, and 315 (51.6%) received PBT. The two groups (PBT vs no PBT) differed significantly with respect to most clinicopathological features, including peri-operative blood loss: median (interquartile range [IQR]) 1000 (600-1500) mL vs 500 (400-800) mL (P < 0.001). Independent predictors of receipt of PBT in multivariable logistic regression analysis were female gender (odds ratio [OR] 5.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.62-9.71; P < 0.001), body mass index (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.87-0.95; P < 0.001), type of urinary diversion (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.18-0.82; P = 0.013), blood loss (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.23-1.40; P < 0.001), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (OR 2.62, 95% CI 1.37-5.00; P = 0.004), and ≥pT3 tumours (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.02-2.48; P = 0.041). In 531 patients with complete data on survival outcomes, unweighted and unadjusted survival analyses showed worse overall survival, cancer-specific mortality and other-cause mortality rates for patients receiving PBT(P < 0.001, P = 0.017 and P = 0.001, respectively). After IPTW adjustment, those differences no longer held true. PBT was not associated with recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.92, 95% CI 0.53-1.58; P = 0.8), overall survival (HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.55-2.05; P = 0.9), cancer-specific mortality (sub-HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.62-1.92; P = 0.8) and other-cause mortality (sub-HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.26-3.85; P > 0.9) in IPTW-adjusted Cox regression and competing-risks analyses. The same held true in conventional multivariable Cox and competing-risks analyses, where PBT could not be confirmed as a predictor of any given endpoint (all P values >0.05).CONCLUSION: The present results did not show an adverse effect of PBT on oncological outcomes after adjusting for baseline differences in patient characteristics.

AB - OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of peri-operative blood transfusion (PBT) on recurrence-free survival, overall survival, cancer-specific mortality and other-cause mortality in patients undergoing radical cystectomy (RC), using a contemporary European multicentre cohort.PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Prospective Multicentre Radical Cystectomy Series (PROMETRICS) includes data on 679 patients who underwent RC at 18 European tertiary care centres in 2011. The association between PBT and oncological survival outcomes was assessed using Kaplan-Meier, Cox regression and competing-risks analyses. Imbalances in clinicopathological features between patients receiving PBT vs those not receiving PBT were mitigated using conventional multivariable adjusting as well as inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW).RESULTS: Overall, 611 patients had complete information on PBT, and 315 (51.6%) received PBT. The two groups (PBT vs no PBT) differed significantly with respect to most clinicopathological features, including peri-operative blood loss: median (interquartile range [IQR]) 1000 (600-1500) mL vs 500 (400-800) mL (P < 0.001). Independent predictors of receipt of PBT in multivariable logistic regression analysis were female gender (odds ratio [OR] 5.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.62-9.71; P < 0.001), body mass index (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.87-0.95; P < 0.001), type of urinary diversion (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.18-0.82; P = 0.013), blood loss (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.23-1.40; P < 0.001), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (OR 2.62, 95% CI 1.37-5.00; P = 0.004), and ≥pT3 tumours (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.02-2.48; P = 0.041). In 531 patients with complete data on survival outcomes, unweighted and unadjusted survival analyses showed worse overall survival, cancer-specific mortality and other-cause mortality rates for patients receiving PBT(P < 0.001, P = 0.017 and P = 0.001, respectively). After IPTW adjustment, those differences no longer held true. PBT was not associated with recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.92, 95% CI 0.53-1.58; P = 0.8), overall survival (HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.55-2.05; P = 0.9), cancer-specific mortality (sub-HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.62-1.92; P = 0.8) and other-cause mortality (sub-HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.26-3.85; P > 0.9) in IPTW-adjusted Cox regression and competing-risks analyses. The same held true in conventional multivariable Cox and competing-risks analyses, where PBT could not be confirmed as a predictor of any given endpoint (all P values >0.05).CONCLUSION: The present results did not show an adverse effect of PBT on oncological outcomes after adjusting for baseline differences in patient characteristics.

KW - Journal Article

KW - Multivariate Analysis

KW - Prognosis

KW - Prospective Studies

KW - Tertiary Care Centers

KW - Risk Assessment

KW - Europe

KW - Humans

KW - Kaplan-Meier Estimate

KW - Proportional Hazards Models

KW - Male

KW - Treatment Outcome

KW - Cause of Death

KW - Disease-Free Survival

KW - Propensity Score

KW - Blood Transfusion, Autologous/adverse effects

KW - Analysis of Variance

KW - Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/mortality

KW - Perioperative Care/methods

KW - Cystectomy/methods

KW - Survival Analysis

KW - Female

KW - Cohort Studies

KW - Databases, Factual

U2 - 10.1111/bju.14012

DO - 10.1111/bju.14012

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 28905486

VL - 121

SP - 101

EP - 110

JO - BJU INT

JF - BJU INT

SN - 1464-4096

IS - 1

ER -