Perinatal outcome in monochorionic twin pregnancies complicated by amniotic fluid discordance without severe twin-twin transfusion syndrome.

Standard

Perinatal outcome in monochorionic twin pregnancies complicated by amniotic fluid discordance without severe twin-twin transfusion syndrome. / Huber, Agnes; Diehl, Werner; Zikulnig, L; Bregenzer, T; Hackelöer, B J; Hecher, Kurt.

In: ULTRASOUND OBST GYN, Vol. 27, No. 1, 1, 2006, p. 48-52.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{82df52fa5b224913b7a3905b4164384d,
title = "Perinatal outcome in monochorionic twin pregnancies complicated by amniotic fluid discordance without severe twin-twin transfusion syndrome.",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: To assess the natural history and perinatal outcome in monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies with discordant amniotic fluid volume without signs of severe twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS). METHODS: This was an observational study of 84 consecutive monochorionic twin pregnancies which did not meet the criteria for severe TTTS and endoscopic laser coagulation of placental anastomoses at initial presentation. The population was subdivided into two groups. Group 1 consisted of 64 pregnancies (median gestational age, 20.1 (range, 15.6-24.7) weeks) with amniotic fluid discordance and no signs of congestive heart failure in the twin with the larger amniotic fluid volume (Twin 1) and positive end-diastolic flow in the umbilical artery of the twin with the smaller amniotic fluid volume (Twin 2). Group 2 (median gestational age, 19.1 (range, 16.0-24.4) weeks) consisted of 20 pregnancies with amniotic fluid discordance and intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) (abdominal circumference <5th percentile) in combination with absent or reversed end-diastolic (ARED) flow in the umbilical artery of Twin 2. After exclusion of one patient from Group 1, who opted for termination of pregnancy, nine patients in Group 1 and one in Group 2 developed severe TTTS, and laser coagulation was offered. The remaining 54 pregnancies of Group 1 were compared with the remaining 19 pregnancies of Group 2. RESULTS: Fetuses in Group 1 showed significantly higher survival rates (overall survival, 100/108 (92.6%) vs. 23/38 (60%), P <0.0001; survival of both fetuses, 49/54 (90.7%) vs. 9/19 (47.4%), P = 0.0002) and median gestational age at delivery (33.6, (range, 27.6-37.8) weeks vs. 32.0 (range, 26.9-36.3) weeks, P = 0.0457). Overall, there was a significantly higher incidence of complications, defined as necessity for intrauterine intervention, fetal or neonatal death or delivery prior to 32 weeks, in Group 2 (Group 1: 30/63 (47.6%); Group 2: 16/20 (80%), P = 0.0188). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that amniotic fluid discordance in monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies in combination with IUGR and umbilical artery ARED flow in one fetus represents an extremely high-risk constellation for adverse pregnancy outcome.",
author = "Agnes Huber and Werner Diehl and L Zikulnig and T Bregenzer and Hackel{\"o}er, {B J} and Kurt Hecher",
year = "2006",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "27",
pages = "48--52",
journal = "ULTRASOUND OBST GYN",
issn = "0960-7692",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perinatal outcome in monochorionic twin pregnancies complicated by amniotic fluid discordance without severe twin-twin transfusion syndrome.

AU - Huber, Agnes

AU - Diehl, Werner

AU - Zikulnig, L

AU - Bregenzer, T

AU - Hackelöer, B J

AU - Hecher, Kurt

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - OBJECTIVES: To assess the natural history and perinatal outcome in monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies with discordant amniotic fluid volume without signs of severe twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS). METHODS: This was an observational study of 84 consecutive monochorionic twin pregnancies which did not meet the criteria for severe TTTS and endoscopic laser coagulation of placental anastomoses at initial presentation. The population was subdivided into two groups. Group 1 consisted of 64 pregnancies (median gestational age, 20.1 (range, 15.6-24.7) weeks) with amniotic fluid discordance and no signs of congestive heart failure in the twin with the larger amniotic fluid volume (Twin 1) and positive end-diastolic flow in the umbilical artery of the twin with the smaller amniotic fluid volume (Twin 2). Group 2 (median gestational age, 19.1 (range, 16.0-24.4) weeks) consisted of 20 pregnancies with amniotic fluid discordance and intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) (abdominal circumference <5th percentile) in combination with absent or reversed end-diastolic (ARED) flow in the umbilical artery of Twin 2. After exclusion of one patient from Group 1, who opted for termination of pregnancy, nine patients in Group 1 and one in Group 2 developed severe TTTS, and laser coagulation was offered. The remaining 54 pregnancies of Group 1 were compared with the remaining 19 pregnancies of Group 2. RESULTS: Fetuses in Group 1 showed significantly higher survival rates (overall survival, 100/108 (92.6%) vs. 23/38 (60%), P <0.0001; survival of both fetuses, 49/54 (90.7%) vs. 9/19 (47.4%), P = 0.0002) and median gestational age at delivery (33.6, (range, 27.6-37.8) weeks vs. 32.0 (range, 26.9-36.3) weeks, P = 0.0457). Overall, there was a significantly higher incidence of complications, defined as necessity for intrauterine intervention, fetal or neonatal death or delivery prior to 32 weeks, in Group 2 (Group 1: 30/63 (47.6%); Group 2: 16/20 (80%), P = 0.0188). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that amniotic fluid discordance in monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies in combination with IUGR and umbilical artery ARED flow in one fetus represents an extremely high-risk constellation for adverse pregnancy outcome.

AB - OBJECTIVES: To assess the natural history and perinatal outcome in monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies with discordant amniotic fluid volume without signs of severe twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS). METHODS: This was an observational study of 84 consecutive monochorionic twin pregnancies which did not meet the criteria for severe TTTS and endoscopic laser coagulation of placental anastomoses at initial presentation. The population was subdivided into two groups. Group 1 consisted of 64 pregnancies (median gestational age, 20.1 (range, 15.6-24.7) weeks) with amniotic fluid discordance and no signs of congestive heart failure in the twin with the larger amniotic fluid volume (Twin 1) and positive end-diastolic flow in the umbilical artery of the twin with the smaller amniotic fluid volume (Twin 2). Group 2 (median gestational age, 19.1 (range, 16.0-24.4) weeks) consisted of 20 pregnancies with amniotic fluid discordance and intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) (abdominal circumference <5th percentile) in combination with absent or reversed end-diastolic (ARED) flow in the umbilical artery of Twin 2. After exclusion of one patient from Group 1, who opted for termination of pregnancy, nine patients in Group 1 and one in Group 2 developed severe TTTS, and laser coagulation was offered. The remaining 54 pregnancies of Group 1 were compared with the remaining 19 pregnancies of Group 2. RESULTS: Fetuses in Group 1 showed significantly higher survival rates (overall survival, 100/108 (92.6%) vs. 23/38 (60%), P <0.0001; survival of both fetuses, 49/54 (90.7%) vs. 9/19 (47.4%), P = 0.0002) and median gestational age at delivery (33.6, (range, 27.6-37.8) weeks vs. 32.0 (range, 26.9-36.3) weeks, P = 0.0457). Overall, there was a significantly higher incidence of complications, defined as necessity for intrauterine intervention, fetal or neonatal death or delivery prior to 32 weeks, in Group 2 (Group 1: 30/63 (47.6%); Group 2: 16/20 (80%), P = 0.0188). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that amniotic fluid discordance in monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies in combination with IUGR and umbilical artery ARED flow in one fetus represents an extremely high-risk constellation for adverse pregnancy outcome.

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

VL - 27

SP - 48

EP - 52

JO - ULTRASOUND OBST GYN

JF - ULTRASOUND OBST GYN

SN - 0960-7692

IS - 1

M1 - 1

ER -