Performance of specific immunoglobulin E tests for diagnosing occupational asthma a systematic review and meta-analysis

Standard

Performance of specific immunoglobulin E tests for diagnosing occupational asthma a systematic review and meta-analysis. / Lux, Harald; Lenz, Klaus; Budnik, Lygia Therese; Baur, X.

In: OCCUP ENVIRON MED, Vol. 76, No. 4, 04.2019, p. 269-278.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{6c5964162e3142a2ad47e220e2ee7104,
title = "Performance of specific immunoglobulin E tests for diagnosing occupational asthma a systematic review and meta-analysis",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: To determine the test performance parameters for the retrievable range of high-molecular-weight (HMW) and low-molecular-weight (LMW) occupational allergens and to evaluate the impact of allergenic components and the implementation of measures for test validation.METHODS: A protocol with predefined objectives and inclusion criteria was the basis of an electronic literature search of MEDLINE and EMBASE (time period 1967-2016). The specific inhalation challenge and serial peak flow measurements were the reference standards for the specific IgE (sIgE) test parameters. All of the review procedures were reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.RESULTS: Seventy-one studies were selected, and 62 entered meta-analysis. Pooled pairs analysis indicated a sensitivity of 0.74(95% CI 0.66 to 0.80) and specificity of 0.71(95% CI 0.63 to 0.77) for HMW allergens and a sensitivity of 0.28(95% CI 0.18 to 0.40) and specificity of 0.89(95% CI 0.77 to 0.95) for LMW allergens. Component-specific analysis improved the test parameters for some allergens. Test validation was handled heterogeneously among studies.CONCLUSION: sIgE test performance is rather satisfactory for a wide range of HMW allergens with the potential for component-specific approaches, whereas sensitivity for LMW allergens is considerably lower, indicating methodological complications and/or divergent pathomechanisms. A common standard for test validation is needed.",
keywords = "Journal Article, Review, Area Under Curve, Biomarkers/analysis, Humans, Animals, Asthma, Occupational/blood, Immunoglobulin E/analysis, Cattle, ROC Curve, Allergens/immunology, Edible Grain/immunology, Latex Hypersensitivity/diagnosis",
author = "Harald Lux and Klaus Lenz and Budnik, {Lygia Therese} and X Baur",
note = "{\textcopyright} Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.",
year = "2019",
month = apr,
doi = "10.1136/oemed-2018-105434",
language = "English",
volume = "76",
pages = "269--278",
journal = "OCCUP ENVIRON MED",
issn = "1351-0711",
publisher = "BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Performance of specific immunoglobulin E tests for diagnosing occupational asthma a systematic review and meta-analysis

AU - Lux, Harald

AU - Lenz, Klaus

AU - Budnik, Lygia Therese

AU - Baur, X

N1 - © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

PY - 2019/4

Y1 - 2019/4

N2 - OBJECTIVES: To determine the test performance parameters for the retrievable range of high-molecular-weight (HMW) and low-molecular-weight (LMW) occupational allergens and to evaluate the impact of allergenic components and the implementation of measures for test validation.METHODS: A protocol with predefined objectives and inclusion criteria was the basis of an electronic literature search of MEDLINE and EMBASE (time period 1967-2016). The specific inhalation challenge and serial peak flow measurements were the reference standards for the specific IgE (sIgE) test parameters. All of the review procedures were reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.RESULTS: Seventy-one studies were selected, and 62 entered meta-analysis. Pooled pairs analysis indicated a sensitivity of 0.74(95% CI 0.66 to 0.80) and specificity of 0.71(95% CI 0.63 to 0.77) for HMW allergens and a sensitivity of 0.28(95% CI 0.18 to 0.40) and specificity of 0.89(95% CI 0.77 to 0.95) for LMW allergens. Component-specific analysis improved the test parameters for some allergens. Test validation was handled heterogeneously among studies.CONCLUSION: sIgE test performance is rather satisfactory for a wide range of HMW allergens with the potential for component-specific approaches, whereas sensitivity for LMW allergens is considerably lower, indicating methodological complications and/or divergent pathomechanisms. A common standard for test validation is needed.

AB - OBJECTIVES: To determine the test performance parameters for the retrievable range of high-molecular-weight (HMW) and low-molecular-weight (LMW) occupational allergens and to evaluate the impact of allergenic components and the implementation of measures for test validation.METHODS: A protocol with predefined objectives and inclusion criteria was the basis of an electronic literature search of MEDLINE and EMBASE (time period 1967-2016). The specific inhalation challenge and serial peak flow measurements were the reference standards for the specific IgE (sIgE) test parameters. All of the review procedures were reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.RESULTS: Seventy-one studies were selected, and 62 entered meta-analysis. Pooled pairs analysis indicated a sensitivity of 0.74(95% CI 0.66 to 0.80) and specificity of 0.71(95% CI 0.63 to 0.77) for HMW allergens and a sensitivity of 0.28(95% CI 0.18 to 0.40) and specificity of 0.89(95% CI 0.77 to 0.95) for LMW allergens. Component-specific analysis improved the test parameters for some allergens. Test validation was handled heterogeneously among studies.CONCLUSION: sIgE test performance is rather satisfactory for a wide range of HMW allergens with the potential for component-specific approaches, whereas sensitivity for LMW allergens is considerably lower, indicating methodological complications and/or divergent pathomechanisms. A common standard for test validation is needed.

KW - Journal Article

KW - Review

KW - Area Under Curve

KW - Biomarkers/analysis

KW - Humans

KW - Animals

KW - Asthma, Occupational/blood

KW - Immunoglobulin E/analysis

KW - Cattle

KW - ROC Curve

KW - Allergens/immunology

KW - Edible Grain/immunology

KW - Latex Hypersensitivity/diagnosis

U2 - 10.1136/oemed-2018-105434

DO - 10.1136/oemed-2018-105434

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 30804164

VL - 76

SP - 269

EP - 278

JO - OCCUP ENVIRON MED

JF - OCCUP ENVIRON MED

SN - 1351-0711

IS - 4

ER -