Performance of a Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography-Derived Risk-Stratification Tool for High-risk and Very High-risk Prostate Cancer

Standard

Performance of a Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography-Derived Risk-Stratification Tool for High-risk and Very High-risk Prostate Cancer. / Xiang, Michael; Ma, Ting Martin; Savjani, Ricky; Pollom, Erqi L; Karnes, R Jeffrey; Grogan, Tristan; Wong, Jessica K; Motterle, Giovanni; Tosoian, Jeffrey J; Trock, Bruce J; Klein, Eric A; Stish, Bradley J; Dess, Robert T; Spratt, Daniel E; Pilar, Avinash; Reddy, Chandana; Levin-Epstein, Rebecca; Wedde, Trude B; Lilleby, Wolfgang A; Fiano, Ryan; Merrick, Gregory S; Stock, Richard G; Demanes, D Jeffrey; Moran, Brian J; Huland, Hartwig; Tran, Phuoc T; Martin, Santiago; Martinez-Monge, Rafael; Krauss, Daniel J; Abu-Isa, Eyad I; Alam, Ridwan; Schwen, Zeyad; Pisansky, Thomas M; Choo, C Richard; Song, Daniel Y; Greco, Stephen; Deville, Curtiland; McNutt, Todd; DeWeese, Theodore L; Ross, Ashley E; Ciezki, Jay P; Boutros, Paul C; Nickols, Nicholas G; Bhat, Prashant; Shabsovich, David; Juarez, Jesus E; Chong, Natalie; Kupelian, Patrick A; Rettig, Matthew B; Zaorsky, Nicholas G; Berlin, Alejandro; Tward, Jonathan D; Davis, Brian J; Reiter, Robert E; Steinberg, Michael L; Elashoff, David; Horwitz, Eric M; Tendulkar, Rahul D; Tilki, Derya; Czernin, Johannes; Gafita, Andrei; Romero, Tahmineh; Calais, Jeremie; Kishan, Amar U.

In: JAMA NETW OPEN, Vol. 4, No. 12, e2138550, 01.12.2021.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Xiang, M, Ma, TM, Savjani, R, Pollom, EL, Karnes, RJ, Grogan, T, Wong, JK, Motterle, G, Tosoian, JJ, Trock, BJ, Klein, EA, Stish, BJ, Dess, RT, Spratt, DE, Pilar, A, Reddy, C, Levin-Epstein, R, Wedde, TB, Lilleby, WA, Fiano, R, Merrick, GS, Stock, RG, Demanes, DJ, Moran, BJ, Huland, H, Tran, PT, Martin, S, Martinez-Monge, R, Krauss, DJ, Abu-Isa, EI, Alam, R, Schwen, Z, Pisansky, TM, Choo, CR, Song, DY, Greco, S, Deville, C, McNutt, T, DeWeese, TL, Ross, AE, Ciezki, JP, Boutros, PC, Nickols, NG, Bhat, P, Shabsovich, D, Juarez, JE, Chong, N, Kupelian, PA, Rettig, MB, Zaorsky, NG, Berlin, A, Tward, JD, Davis, BJ, Reiter, RE, Steinberg, ML, Elashoff, D, Horwitz, EM, Tendulkar, RD, Tilki, D, Czernin, J, Gafita, A, Romero, T, Calais, J & Kishan, AU 2021, 'Performance of a Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography-Derived Risk-Stratification Tool for High-risk and Very High-risk Prostate Cancer', JAMA NETW OPEN, vol. 4, no. 12, e2138550. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.38550

APA

Xiang, M., Ma, T. M., Savjani, R., Pollom, E. L., Karnes, R. J., Grogan, T., Wong, J. K., Motterle, G., Tosoian, J. J., Trock, B. J., Klein, E. A., Stish, B. J., Dess, R. T., Spratt, D. E., Pilar, A., Reddy, C., Levin-Epstein, R., Wedde, T. B., Lilleby, W. A., ... Kishan, A. U. (2021). Performance of a Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography-Derived Risk-Stratification Tool for High-risk and Very High-risk Prostate Cancer. JAMA NETW OPEN, 4(12), [e2138550]. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.38550

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{dd780163107b4136a75e2359123df8fd,
title = "Performance of a Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography-Derived Risk-Stratification Tool for High-risk and Very High-risk Prostate Cancer",
abstract = "Importance: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) can detect low-volume, nonlocalized (ie, regional or metastatic) prostate cancer that was occult on conventional imaging. However, the long-term clinical implications of PSMA PET/CT upstaging remain unclear.Objectives: To evaluate the prognostic significance of a nomogram that models an individual's risk of nonlocalized upstaging on PSMA PET/CT and to compare its performance with existing risk-stratification tools.Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included patients diagnosed with high-risk or very high-risk prostate cancer (ie, prostate-specific antigen [PSA] level >20 ng/mL, Gleason score 8-10, and/or clinical stage T3-T4, without evidence of nodal or metastatic disease by conventional workup) from April 1995 to August 2018. This multinational study was conducted at 15 centers. Data were analyzed from December 2020 to March 2021.Exposures: Curative-intent radical prostatectomy (RP), external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), or EBRT plus brachytherapy (BT), with or without androgen deprivation therapy.Main Outcomes and Measures: PSMA upstage probability was calculated from a nomogram using the biopsy Gleason score, percentage positive systematic biopsy cores, clinical T category, and PSA level. Biochemical recurrence (BCR), distant metastasis (DM), prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using Fine-Gray and Cox regressions. Model performance was quantified with the concordance (C) index.Results: Of 5275 patients, the median (IQR) age was 66 (60-72) years; 2883 (55%) were treated with RP, 1669 (32%) with EBRT, and 723 (14%) with EBRT plus BT; median (IQR) PSA level was 10.5 (5.9-23.2) ng/mL; 3987 (76%) had Gleason grade 8 to 10 disease; and 750 (14%) had stage T3 to T4 disease. Median (IQR) follow-up was 5.1 (3.1-7.9) years; 1221 (23%) were followed up for at least 8 years. Overall, 1895 (36%) had BCR, 851 (16%) developed DM, and 242 (5%) died of prostate cancer. PSMA upstage probability was significantly prognostic of all clinical end points, with 8-year C indices of 0.63 (95% CI, 0.61-0.65) for BCR, 0.69 (95% CI, 0.66-0.71) for DM, 0.71 (95% CI, 0.67-0.75) for PCSM, and 0.60 (95% CI, 0.57-0.62) for PCSM (P < .001). The PSMA nomogram outperformed existing risk-stratification tools, except for similar performance to Staging Collaboration for Cancer of the Prostate (STAR-CAP) for PCSM (eg, DM: PSMA, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.66-0.71] vs STAR-CAP, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.62-0.68]; P < .001; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center nomogram, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.54-0.60]; P < .001; Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment groups, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.51-0.56]; P < .001). Results were validated in secondary cohorts from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database and the National Cancer Database.Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that PSMA upstage probability is associated with long-term, clinically meaningful end points. Furthermore, PSMA upstaging had superior risk discrimination compared with existing tools. Formerly occult, PSMA PET/CT-detectable nonlocalized disease may be the main driver of outcomes in high-risk patients.",
author = "Michael Xiang and Ma, {Ting Martin} and Ricky Savjani and Pollom, {Erqi L} and Karnes, {R Jeffrey} and Tristan Grogan and Wong, {Jessica K} and Giovanni Motterle and Tosoian, {Jeffrey J} and Trock, {Bruce J} and Klein, {Eric A} and Stish, {Bradley J} and Dess, {Robert T} and Spratt, {Daniel E} and Avinash Pilar and Chandana Reddy and Rebecca Levin-Epstein and Wedde, {Trude B} and Lilleby, {Wolfgang A} and Ryan Fiano and Merrick, {Gregory S} and Stock, {Richard G} and Demanes, {D Jeffrey} and Moran, {Brian J} and Hartwig Huland and Tran, {Phuoc T} and Santiago Martin and Rafael Martinez-Monge and Krauss, {Daniel J} and Abu-Isa, {Eyad I} and Ridwan Alam and Zeyad Schwen and Pisansky, {Thomas M} and Choo, {C Richard} and Song, {Daniel Y} and Stephen Greco and Curtiland Deville and Todd McNutt and DeWeese, {Theodore L} and Ross, {Ashley E} and Ciezki, {Jay P} and Boutros, {Paul C} and Nickols, {Nicholas G} and Prashant Bhat and David Shabsovich and Juarez, {Jesus E} and Natalie Chong and Kupelian, {Patrick A} and Rettig, {Matthew B} and Zaorsky, {Nicholas G} and Alejandro Berlin and Tward, {Jonathan D} and Davis, {Brian J} and Reiter, {Robert E} and Steinberg, {Michael L} and David Elashoff and Horwitz, {Eric M} and Tendulkar, {Rahul D} and Derya Tilki and Johannes Czernin and Andrei Gafita and Tahmineh Romero and Jeremie Calais and Kishan, {Amar U}",
year = "2021",
month = dec,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.38550",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
journal = "JAMA NETW OPEN",
issn = "2574-3805",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "12",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Performance of a Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography-Derived Risk-Stratification Tool for High-risk and Very High-risk Prostate Cancer

AU - Xiang, Michael

AU - Ma, Ting Martin

AU - Savjani, Ricky

AU - Pollom, Erqi L

AU - Karnes, R Jeffrey

AU - Grogan, Tristan

AU - Wong, Jessica K

AU - Motterle, Giovanni

AU - Tosoian, Jeffrey J

AU - Trock, Bruce J

AU - Klein, Eric A

AU - Stish, Bradley J

AU - Dess, Robert T

AU - Spratt, Daniel E

AU - Pilar, Avinash

AU - Reddy, Chandana

AU - Levin-Epstein, Rebecca

AU - Wedde, Trude B

AU - Lilleby, Wolfgang A

AU - Fiano, Ryan

AU - Merrick, Gregory S

AU - Stock, Richard G

AU - Demanes, D Jeffrey

AU - Moran, Brian J

AU - Huland, Hartwig

AU - Tran, Phuoc T

AU - Martin, Santiago

AU - Martinez-Monge, Rafael

AU - Krauss, Daniel J

AU - Abu-Isa, Eyad I

AU - Alam, Ridwan

AU - Schwen, Zeyad

AU - Pisansky, Thomas M

AU - Choo, C Richard

AU - Song, Daniel Y

AU - Greco, Stephen

AU - Deville, Curtiland

AU - McNutt, Todd

AU - DeWeese, Theodore L

AU - Ross, Ashley E

AU - Ciezki, Jay P

AU - Boutros, Paul C

AU - Nickols, Nicholas G

AU - Bhat, Prashant

AU - Shabsovich, David

AU - Juarez, Jesus E

AU - Chong, Natalie

AU - Kupelian, Patrick A

AU - Rettig, Matthew B

AU - Zaorsky, Nicholas G

AU - Berlin, Alejandro

AU - Tward, Jonathan D

AU - Davis, Brian J

AU - Reiter, Robert E

AU - Steinberg, Michael L

AU - Elashoff, David

AU - Horwitz, Eric M

AU - Tendulkar, Rahul D

AU - Tilki, Derya

AU - Czernin, Johannes

AU - Gafita, Andrei

AU - Romero, Tahmineh

AU - Calais, Jeremie

AU - Kishan, Amar U

PY - 2021/12/1

Y1 - 2021/12/1

N2 - Importance: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) can detect low-volume, nonlocalized (ie, regional or metastatic) prostate cancer that was occult on conventional imaging. However, the long-term clinical implications of PSMA PET/CT upstaging remain unclear.Objectives: To evaluate the prognostic significance of a nomogram that models an individual's risk of nonlocalized upstaging on PSMA PET/CT and to compare its performance with existing risk-stratification tools.Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included patients diagnosed with high-risk or very high-risk prostate cancer (ie, prostate-specific antigen [PSA] level >20 ng/mL, Gleason score 8-10, and/or clinical stage T3-T4, without evidence of nodal or metastatic disease by conventional workup) from April 1995 to August 2018. This multinational study was conducted at 15 centers. Data were analyzed from December 2020 to March 2021.Exposures: Curative-intent radical prostatectomy (RP), external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), or EBRT plus brachytherapy (BT), with or without androgen deprivation therapy.Main Outcomes and Measures: PSMA upstage probability was calculated from a nomogram using the biopsy Gleason score, percentage positive systematic biopsy cores, clinical T category, and PSA level. Biochemical recurrence (BCR), distant metastasis (DM), prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using Fine-Gray and Cox regressions. Model performance was quantified with the concordance (C) index.Results: Of 5275 patients, the median (IQR) age was 66 (60-72) years; 2883 (55%) were treated with RP, 1669 (32%) with EBRT, and 723 (14%) with EBRT plus BT; median (IQR) PSA level was 10.5 (5.9-23.2) ng/mL; 3987 (76%) had Gleason grade 8 to 10 disease; and 750 (14%) had stage T3 to T4 disease. Median (IQR) follow-up was 5.1 (3.1-7.9) years; 1221 (23%) were followed up for at least 8 years. Overall, 1895 (36%) had BCR, 851 (16%) developed DM, and 242 (5%) died of prostate cancer. PSMA upstage probability was significantly prognostic of all clinical end points, with 8-year C indices of 0.63 (95% CI, 0.61-0.65) for BCR, 0.69 (95% CI, 0.66-0.71) for DM, 0.71 (95% CI, 0.67-0.75) for PCSM, and 0.60 (95% CI, 0.57-0.62) for PCSM (P < .001). The PSMA nomogram outperformed existing risk-stratification tools, except for similar performance to Staging Collaboration for Cancer of the Prostate (STAR-CAP) for PCSM (eg, DM: PSMA, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.66-0.71] vs STAR-CAP, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.62-0.68]; P < .001; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center nomogram, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.54-0.60]; P < .001; Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment groups, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.51-0.56]; P < .001). Results were validated in secondary cohorts from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database and the National Cancer Database.Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that PSMA upstage probability is associated with long-term, clinically meaningful end points. Furthermore, PSMA upstaging had superior risk discrimination compared with existing tools. Formerly occult, PSMA PET/CT-detectable nonlocalized disease may be the main driver of outcomes in high-risk patients.

AB - Importance: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) can detect low-volume, nonlocalized (ie, regional or metastatic) prostate cancer that was occult on conventional imaging. However, the long-term clinical implications of PSMA PET/CT upstaging remain unclear.Objectives: To evaluate the prognostic significance of a nomogram that models an individual's risk of nonlocalized upstaging on PSMA PET/CT and to compare its performance with existing risk-stratification tools.Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included patients diagnosed with high-risk or very high-risk prostate cancer (ie, prostate-specific antigen [PSA] level >20 ng/mL, Gleason score 8-10, and/or clinical stage T3-T4, without evidence of nodal or metastatic disease by conventional workup) from April 1995 to August 2018. This multinational study was conducted at 15 centers. Data were analyzed from December 2020 to March 2021.Exposures: Curative-intent radical prostatectomy (RP), external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), or EBRT plus brachytherapy (BT), with or without androgen deprivation therapy.Main Outcomes and Measures: PSMA upstage probability was calculated from a nomogram using the biopsy Gleason score, percentage positive systematic biopsy cores, clinical T category, and PSA level. Biochemical recurrence (BCR), distant metastasis (DM), prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using Fine-Gray and Cox regressions. Model performance was quantified with the concordance (C) index.Results: Of 5275 patients, the median (IQR) age was 66 (60-72) years; 2883 (55%) were treated with RP, 1669 (32%) with EBRT, and 723 (14%) with EBRT plus BT; median (IQR) PSA level was 10.5 (5.9-23.2) ng/mL; 3987 (76%) had Gleason grade 8 to 10 disease; and 750 (14%) had stage T3 to T4 disease. Median (IQR) follow-up was 5.1 (3.1-7.9) years; 1221 (23%) were followed up for at least 8 years. Overall, 1895 (36%) had BCR, 851 (16%) developed DM, and 242 (5%) died of prostate cancer. PSMA upstage probability was significantly prognostic of all clinical end points, with 8-year C indices of 0.63 (95% CI, 0.61-0.65) for BCR, 0.69 (95% CI, 0.66-0.71) for DM, 0.71 (95% CI, 0.67-0.75) for PCSM, and 0.60 (95% CI, 0.57-0.62) for PCSM (P < .001). The PSMA nomogram outperformed existing risk-stratification tools, except for similar performance to Staging Collaboration for Cancer of the Prostate (STAR-CAP) for PCSM (eg, DM: PSMA, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.66-0.71] vs STAR-CAP, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.62-0.68]; P < .001; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center nomogram, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.54-0.60]; P < .001; Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment groups, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.51-0.56]; P < .001). Results were validated in secondary cohorts from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database and the National Cancer Database.Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that PSMA upstage probability is associated with long-term, clinically meaningful end points. Furthermore, PSMA upstaging had superior risk discrimination compared with existing tools. Formerly occult, PSMA PET/CT-detectable nonlocalized disease may be the main driver of outcomes in high-risk patients.

U2 - 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.38550

DO - 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.38550

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 34902034

VL - 4

JO - JAMA NETW OPEN

JF - JAMA NETW OPEN

SN - 2574-3805

IS - 12

M1 - e2138550

ER -