Percutaneous Transvalvular Microaxial Flow Pump Support in Cardiology

Standard

Percutaneous Transvalvular Microaxial Flow Pump Support in Cardiology. / Lüsebrink, Enzo; Kellnar, Antonia; Krieg, Kathrin; Binzenhöfer, Leonhard; Scherer, Clemens; Zimmer, Sebastian; Schrage, Benedikt; Fichtner, Stephanie; Petzold, Tobias; Braun, Daniel; Peterss, Sven; Brunner, Stefan; Hagl, Christian; Westermann, Dirk; Hausleiter, Jörg; Massberg, Steffen; Thiele, Holger; Schäfer, Andreas; Orban, Martin.

In: CIRCULATION, Vol. 145, No. 16, 19.04.2022, p. 1254-1284.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Review articleResearch

Harvard

Lüsebrink, E, Kellnar, A, Krieg, K, Binzenhöfer, L, Scherer, C, Zimmer, S, Schrage, B, Fichtner, S, Petzold, T, Braun, D, Peterss, S, Brunner, S, Hagl, C, Westermann, D, Hausleiter, J, Massberg, S, Thiele, H, Schäfer, A & Orban, M 2022, 'Percutaneous Transvalvular Microaxial Flow Pump Support in Cardiology', CIRCULATION, vol. 145, no. 16, pp. 1254-1284. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.058229

APA

Lüsebrink, E., Kellnar, A., Krieg, K., Binzenhöfer, L., Scherer, C., Zimmer, S., Schrage, B., Fichtner, S., Petzold, T., Braun, D., Peterss, S., Brunner, S., Hagl, C., Westermann, D., Hausleiter, J., Massberg, S., Thiele, H., Schäfer, A., & Orban, M. (2022). Percutaneous Transvalvular Microaxial Flow Pump Support in Cardiology. CIRCULATION, 145(16), 1254-1284. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.058229

Vancouver

Lüsebrink E, Kellnar A, Krieg K, Binzenhöfer L, Scherer C, Zimmer S et al. Percutaneous Transvalvular Microaxial Flow Pump Support in Cardiology. CIRCULATION. 2022 Apr 19;145(16):1254-1284. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.058229

Bibtex

@article{2ff2f15c36cf4e60964d3016cc74dcee,
title = "Percutaneous Transvalvular Microaxial Flow Pump Support in Cardiology",
abstract = "The Impella device (Impella, Abiomed, Danvers, MA) is a percutaneous transvalvular microaxial flow pump that is currently used for (1) cardiogenic shock, (2) left ventricular unloading (combination of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and Impella concept), (3) high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions, (4) ablation of ventricular tachycardia, and (5) treatment of right ventricular failure. Impella-assisted forward blood flow increased mean arterial pressure and cardiac output, peripheral tissue perfusion, and coronary blood flow in observational studies and some randomized trials. However, because of the need for large-bore femoral access (14 F for the commonly used Impella CP device) and anticoagulation, the incidences of bleeding and ischemic complications are as much as 44% and 18%, respectively. Hemolysis is reported in as many as 32% of patients and stroke in as many as 13%. Despite the rapidly growing use of the Impella device, there are still insufficient data on its effect on outcome and complications on the basis of large, adequately powered randomized controlled trials. The only 2 small and also underpowered randomized controlled trials in cardiogenic shock comparing Impella versus intra-aortic balloon pump did not show improved mortality. Several larger randomized controlled trials are currently recruiting patients or are in preparation in cardiogenic shock (DanGer Shock [Danish-German Cardiogenic Shock Trial; NCT01633502]), left ventricular unloading (DTU-STEMI [Door-To-Unload in ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction; NCT03947619], UNLOAD ECMO [Left Ventricular Unloading to Improve Outcome in Cardiogenic Shock Patients on VA-ECMO], and REVERSE [A Prospective Randomised Trial of Early LV Venting Using Impella CP for Recovery in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Managed With VA ECMO; NCT03431467]) and high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PROTECT IV [Impella-Supported PCI in High-Risk Patients With Complex Coronary Artery Disease and Reduced Left Ventricular Function; NCT04763200]).",
keywords = "Cardiology, Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/adverse effects, Heart-Assist Devices/adverse effects, Humans, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects, Prospective Studies, ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/complications, Shock, Cardiogenic, Treatment Outcome",
author = "Enzo L{\"u}sebrink and Antonia Kellnar and Kathrin Krieg and Leonhard Binzenh{\"o}fer and Clemens Scherer and Sebastian Zimmer and Benedikt Schrage and Stephanie Fichtner and Tobias Petzold and Daniel Braun and Sven Peterss and Stefan Brunner and Christian Hagl and Dirk Westermann and J{\"o}rg Hausleiter and Steffen Massberg and Holger Thiele and Andreas Sch{\"a}fer and Martin Orban",
year = "2022",
month = apr,
day = "19",
doi = "10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.058229",
language = "English",
volume = "145",
pages = "1254--1284",
journal = "CIRCULATION",
issn = "0009-7322",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "16",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Percutaneous Transvalvular Microaxial Flow Pump Support in Cardiology

AU - Lüsebrink, Enzo

AU - Kellnar, Antonia

AU - Krieg, Kathrin

AU - Binzenhöfer, Leonhard

AU - Scherer, Clemens

AU - Zimmer, Sebastian

AU - Schrage, Benedikt

AU - Fichtner, Stephanie

AU - Petzold, Tobias

AU - Braun, Daniel

AU - Peterss, Sven

AU - Brunner, Stefan

AU - Hagl, Christian

AU - Westermann, Dirk

AU - Hausleiter, Jörg

AU - Massberg, Steffen

AU - Thiele, Holger

AU - Schäfer, Andreas

AU - Orban, Martin

PY - 2022/4/19

Y1 - 2022/4/19

N2 - The Impella device (Impella, Abiomed, Danvers, MA) is a percutaneous transvalvular microaxial flow pump that is currently used for (1) cardiogenic shock, (2) left ventricular unloading (combination of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and Impella concept), (3) high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions, (4) ablation of ventricular tachycardia, and (5) treatment of right ventricular failure. Impella-assisted forward blood flow increased mean arterial pressure and cardiac output, peripheral tissue perfusion, and coronary blood flow in observational studies and some randomized trials. However, because of the need for large-bore femoral access (14 F for the commonly used Impella CP device) and anticoagulation, the incidences of bleeding and ischemic complications are as much as 44% and 18%, respectively. Hemolysis is reported in as many as 32% of patients and stroke in as many as 13%. Despite the rapidly growing use of the Impella device, there are still insufficient data on its effect on outcome and complications on the basis of large, adequately powered randomized controlled trials. The only 2 small and also underpowered randomized controlled trials in cardiogenic shock comparing Impella versus intra-aortic balloon pump did not show improved mortality. Several larger randomized controlled trials are currently recruiting patients or are in preparation in cardiogenic shock (DanGer Shock [Danish-German Cardiogenic Shock Trial; NCT01633502]), left ventricular unloading (DTU-STEMI [Door-To-Unload in ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction; NCT03947619], UNLOAD ECMO [Left Ventricular Unloading to Improve Outcome in Cardiogenic Shock Patients on VA-ECMO], and REVERSE [A Prospective Randomised Trial of Early LV Venting Using Impella CP for Recovery in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Managed With VA ECMO; NCT03431467]) and high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PROTECT IV [Impella-Supported PCI in High-Risk Patients With Complex Coronary Artery Disease and Reduced Left Ventricular Function; NCT04763200]).

AB - The Impella device (Impella, Abiomed, Danvers, MA) is a percutaneous transvalvular microaxial flow pump that is currently used for (1) cardiogenic shock, (2) left ventricular unloading (combination of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and Impella concept), (3) high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions, (4) ablation of ventricular tachycardia, and (5) treatment of right ventricular failure. Impella-assisted forward blood flow increased mean arterial pressure and cardiac output, peripheral tissue perfusion, and coronary blood flow in observational studies and some randomized trials. However, because of the need for large-bore femoral access (14 F for the commonly used Impella CP device) and anticoagulation, the incidences of bleeding and ischemic complications are as much as 44% and 18%, respectively. Hemolysis is reported in as many as 32% of patients and stroke in as many as 13%. Despite the rapidly growing use of the Impella device, there are still insufficient data on its effect on outcome and complications on the basis of large, adequately powered randomized controlled trials. The only 2 small and also underpowered randomized controlled trials in cardiogenic shock comparing Impella versus intra-aortic balloon pump did not show improved mortality. Several larger randomized controlled trials are currently recruiting patients or are in preparation in cardiogenic shock (DanGer Shock [Danish-German Cardiogenic Shock Trial; NCT01633502]), left ventricular unloading (DTU-STEMI [Door-To-Unload in ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction; NCT03947619], UNLOAD ECMO [Left Ventricular Unloading to Improve Outcome in Cardiogenic Shock Patients on VA-ECMO], and REVERSE [A Prospective Randomised Trial of Early LV Venting Using Impella CP for Recovery in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Managed With VA ECMO; NCT03431467]) and high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PROTECT IV [Impella-Supported PCI in High-Risk Patients With Complex Coronary Artery Disease and Reduced Left Ventricular Function; NCT04763200]).

KW - Cardiology

KW - Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/adverse effects

KW - Heart-Assist Devices/adverse effects

KW - Humans

KW - Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects

KW - Prospective Studies

KW - ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/complications

KW - Shock, Cardiogenic

KW - Treatment Outcome

U2 - 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.058229

DO - 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.058229

M3 - SCORING: Review article

C2 - 35436135

VL - 145

SP - 1254

EP - 1284

JO - CIRCULATION

JF - CIRCULATION

SN - 0009-7322

IS - 16

ER -