Pelvic Fixation for Non-Ambulatory Patients with Neuromuscular Scoliosis Treated with Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods—A 4-Year Comparison of Two Different Fixation Methods
Standard
Pelvic Fixation for Non-Ambulatory Patients with Neuromuscular Scoliosis Treated with Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods—A 4-Year Comparison of Two Different Fixation Methods. / Heuer, Annika; Stücker, Sebastian; Stücker, Ralf; Mladenov, Kiril.
In: J CLIN MED, Vol. 13, No. 13, 3845, 29.06.2024.Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journal › SCORING: Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Pelvic Fixation for Non-Ambulatory Patients with Neuromuscular Scoliosis Treated with Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods—A 4-Year Comparison of Two Different Fixation Methods
AU - Heuer, Annika
AU - Stücker, Sebastian
AU - Stücker, Ralf
AU - Mladenov, Kiril
PY - 2024/6/29
Y1 - 2024/6/29
N2 - Background/Objectives: This study aims to analyze the efficacy and safety of the two pelvic fixation systems, S-hooks (SH) and lumbar-sacral-alar-iliac (SAI) screws, when used in association with magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGRs) in non-ambulatory children with severe neuromuscular scoliosis (NMS). Methods: Forty-one patients were retrospectively examined and subdivided corresponding to ilium hook fixation or SAI screws. The major curve correction (%) and pelvic obliquity (PO) correction (%) were assessed utilizing scoliosis plain film radiographs over time. Complications and unplanned return to the operating room (UPROR) were recorded. Patient-specific pre- and postoperative values were included in a backward stepwise regression model to assess UPROR. Results: Mean age at index intervention was 9.4 years. Preoperative main curve was 81° and PO was 22°. 21 and 20 patients were categorized into the SH and SAI subgroups, respectively. Initial curve correction was significantly better in the SAI subgroup (63 vs. 42% in the SH, p = 0.045), while PO correction was equally good. Curve and PO correction were maintained throughout the follow-up period of 55 months. UPROR rate was 38% in the SH subgroup, and 5% in the SAI subgroup (p = 0.010). Regression analysis identified postoperative curve correction as predictive value for UPROR (p = 0.006). Conclusions: SAI screw fixation has a low UPROR rate and achieves superior curve correction. S-hooks are a viable option to correct PO and NMS in children with high operative risk to reduce operative time, but revision surgery is not uncommon.
AB - Background/Objectives: This study aims to analyze the efficacy and safety of the two pelvic fixation systems, S-hooks (SH) and lumbar-sacral-alar-iliac (SAI) screws, when used in association with magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGRs) in non-ambulatory children with severe neuromuscular scoliosis (NMS). Methods: Forty-one patients were retrospectively examined and subdivided corresponding to ilium hook fixation or SAI screws. The major curve correction (%) and pelvic obliquity (PO) correction (%) were assessed utilizing scoliosis plain film radiographs over time. Complications and unplanned return to the operating room (UPROR) were recorded. Patient-specific pre- and postoperative values were included in a backward stepwise regression model to assess UPROR. Results: Mean age at index intervention was 9.4 years. Preoperative main curve was 81° and PO was 22°. 21 and 20 patients were categorized into the SH and SAI subgroups, respectively. Initial curve correction was significantly better in the SAI subgroup (63 vs. 42% in the SH, p = 0.045), while PO correction was equally good. Curve and PO correction were maintained throughout the follow-up period of 55 months. UPROR rate was 38% in the SH subgroup, and 5% in the SAI subgroup (p = 0.010). Regression analysis identified postoperative curve correction as predictive value for UPROR (p = 0.006). Conclusions: SAI screw fixation has a low UPROR rate and achieves superior curve correction. S-hooks are a viable option to correct PO and NMS in children with high operative risk to reduce operative time, but revision surgery is not uncommon.
U2 - 10.3390/jcm13133845
DO - 10.3390/jcm13133845
M3 - SCORING: Journal article
VL - 13
JO - J CLIN MED
JF - J CLIN MED
SN - 2077-0383
IS - 13
M1 - 3845
ER -