Research ExplorerPublicationsPatients' and observers' perceptions of involvement differ. ...

Patients' and observers' perceptions of involvement differ. Validation study on inter-relating measures for shared decision making.

Standard

Patients' and observers' perceptions of involvement differ. Validation study on inter-relating measures for shared decision making. / Kasper, Jürgen; Heesen, Christoph; Köpke, Sascha; Fulcher, Gary; Geiger, Friedemann.

In: PLOS ONE, Vol. 6, No. 10, 10, 2011, p. 26255.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journal › SCORING: Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Kasper, J, Heesen, C, Köpke, S, Fulcher, G & Geiger, F 2011, 'Patients' and observers' perceptions of involvement differ. Validation study on inter-relating measures for shared decision making.', PLOS ONE, vol. 6, no. 10, 10, pp. 26255. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026255

APA

Kasper, J., Heesen, C., Köpke, S., Fulcher, G., & Geiger, F. (2011). Patients' and observers' perceptions of involvement differ. Validation study on inter-relating measures for shared decision making. PLOS ONE, 6(10), 26255. [10]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026255

Vancouver

Kasper J, Heesen C, Köpke S, Fulcher G, Geiger F. Patients' and observers' perceptions of involvement differ. Validation study on inter-relating measures for shared decision making. PLOS ONE. 2011;6(10):26255. 10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026255

Bibtex

@article{7d80d9a936bd418dae3db9ac763fed7d,
title = "Patients' and observers' perceptions of involvement differ. Validation study on inter-relating measures for shared decision making.",
abstract = "Patient involvement into medical decisions as conceived in the shared decision making method (SDM) is essential in evidence based medicine. However, it is not conclusively evident how best to define, realize and evaluate involvement to enable patients making informed choices. We aimed at investigating the ability of four measures to indicate patient involvement. While use and reporting of these instruments might imply wide overlap regarding the addressed constructs this assumption seems questionable with respect to the diversity of the perspectives from which the assessments are administered.",
keywords = "Humans, Cohort Studies, Physician-Patient Relations, Communication, *Decision Making, *Decision Support Techniques, Immunotherapy, Multiple Sclerosis/therapy, *Patient Participation, *Perception, Humans, Cohort Studies, Physician-Patient Relations, Communication, *Decision Making, *Decision Support Techniques, Immunotherapy, Multiple Sclerosis/therapy, *Patient Participation, *Perception",
author = "J{\"u}rgen Kasper and Christoph Heesen and Sascha K{\"o}pke and Gary Fulcher and Friedemann Geiger",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0026255",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "26255",
journal = "PLOS ONE",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patients' and observers' perceptions of involvement differ. Validation study on inter-relating measures for shared decision making.

AU - Kasper, Jürgen

AU - Heesen, Christoph

AU - Köpke, Sascha

AU - Fulcher, Gary

AU - Geiger, Friedemann

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Patient involvement into medical decisions as conceived in the shared decision making method (SDM) is essential in evidence based medicine. However, it is not conclusively evident how best to define, realize and evaluate involvement to enable patients making informed choices. We aimed at investigating the ability of four measures to indicate patient involvement. While use and reporting of these instruments might imply wide overlap regarding the addressed constructs this assumption seems questionable with respect to the diversity of the perspectives from which the assessments are administered.

AB - Patient involvement into medical decisions as conceived in the shared decision making method (SDM) is essential in evidence based medicine. However, it is not conclusively evident how best to define, realize and evaluate involvement to enable patients making informed choices. We aimed at investigating the ability of four measures to indicate patient involvement. While use and reporting of these instruments might imply wide overlap regarding the addressed constructs this assumption seems questionable with respect to the diversity of the perspectives from which the assessments are administered.

KW - Humans

KW - Cohort Studies

KW - Physician-Patient Relations

KW - Communication

KW - Decision Making

KW - Decision Support Techniques

KW - Immunotherapy

KW - Multiple Sclerosis/therapy

KW - Patient Participation

KW - Perception

KW - Humans

KW - Cohort Studies

KW - Physician-Patient Relations

KW - Communication

KW - Decision Making

KW - Decision Support Techniques

KW - Immunotherapy

KW - Multiple Sclerosis/therapy

KW - Patient Participation

KW - Perception

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0026255

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0026255

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

VL - 6

SP - 26255

JO - PLOS ONE

JF - PLOS ONE

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 10

M1 - 10

ER -