Pallidal deep brain stimulation in patients with primary generalised or segmental dystonia

Standard

Pallidal deep brain stimulation in patients with primary generalised or segmental dystonia : 5-year follow-up of a randomised trial. / Volkmann, Jens; Wolters, Alexander; Kupsch, Andreas; Müller, Jörg; Kühn, Andrea A; Schneider, Gerd-Helge; Poewe, Werner; Hering, Sascha; Eisner, Wilhelm; Müller, Jan-Uwe; Deuschl, Günther; Pinsker, Marcus O; Skogseid, Inger-Marie; Roeste, Geir Ketil; Krause, Martin; Tronnier, Volker; Schnitzler, Alfons; Voges, Jürgen; Nikkhah, Guido; Vesper, Jan; Classen, Joseph; Naumann, Markus; Benecke, Reiner; DBS study group for dystonia.

In: LANCET NEUROL, Vol. 11, No. 12, 12.2012, p. 1029-38.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Volkmann, J, Wolters, A, Kupsch, A, Müller, J, Kühn, AA, Schneider, G-H, Poewe, W, Hering, S, Eisner, W, Müller, J-U, Deuschl, G, Pinsker, MO, Skogseid, I-M, Roeste, GK, Krause, M, Tronnier, V, Schnitzler, A, Voges, J, Nikkhah, G, Vesper, J, Classen, J, Naumann, M, Benecke, R & DBS study group for dystonia 2012, 'Pallidal deep brain stimulation in patients with primary generalised or segmental dystonia: 5-year follow-up of a randomised trial', LANCET NEUROL, vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 1029-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70257-0

APA

Volkmann, J., Wolters, A., Kupsch, A., Müller, J., Kühn, A. A., Schneider, G-H., Poewe, W., Hering, S., Eisner, W., Müller, J-U., Deuschl, G., Pinsker, M. O., Skogseid, I-M., Roeste, G. K., Krause, M., Tronnier, V., Schnitzler, A., Voges, J., Nikkhah, G., ... DBS study group for dystonia (2012). Pallidal deep brain stimulation in patients with primary generalised or segmental dystonia: 5-year follow-up of a randomised trial. LANCET NEUROL, 11(12), 1029-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70257-0

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{d8c9c2e8cc724619a42b21499850cc2f,
title = "Pallidal deep brain stimulation in patients with primary generalised or segmental dystonia: 5-year follow-up of a randomised trial",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Severe forms of primary dystonia are difficult to manage medically. We assessed the safety and efficacy of pallidal neurostimulation in patients with primary generalised or segmental dystonia prospectively followed up for 5 years in a controlled multicentre trial.METHODS: In the parent trial, 40 patients were randomly assigned to either sham neurostimulation or neurostimulation of the internal globus pallidus for a period of 3 months and thereafter all patients completed 6 months of active neurostimulation. 38 patients agreed to be followed up annually after the activation of neurostimulation, including assessments of dystonia severity, pain, disability, and quality of life. The primary endpoint of the 5-year follow-up study extension was the change in dystonia severity at 3 years and 5 years as assessed by open-label ratings of the Burke-Fahn-Marsden dystonia rating scale (BFMDRS) motor score compared with the preoperative baseline and the 6-month visit. The primary endpoint was analysed on an intention-to-treat basis. The original trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00142259).FINDINGS: An intention-to-treat analysis including all patients from the parent trial showed significant improvements in dystonia severity at 3 years and 5 years compared with baseline, which corresponded to -20·8 points (SD 17·1; -47·9%; n=40) at 6 months; -26·5 points (19·7; -61·1%; n=31) at 3 years; and -25·1 points (21·3; -57·8%; n=32). The improvement from 6 months to 3 years (-5·7 points [SD 8·4]; -34%) was significant and sustained at the 5-year follow-up (-4·3 [10·4]). 49 new adverse events occurred between 6 months and 5 years. Dysarthria and transient worsening of dystonia were the most common non-serious adverse events. 21 adverse events were rated serious and were almost exclusively device related. One patient attempted suicide shortly after the 6-month visit during a depressive episode. All serious adverse events resolved without permanent sequelae.INTERPRETATION: 3 years and 5 years after surgery, pallidal neurostimulation continues to be an effective and relatively safe treatment option for patients with severe idiopathic dystonia. This long-term observation provides further evidence in favour of pallidal neurostimulation as a first-line treatment for patients with medically intractable, segmental, or generalised dystonia.FUNDING: Medtronic.",
keywords = "Adult, Deep Brain Stimulation, Dystonic Disorders, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Globus Pallidus, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't",
author = "Jens Volkmann and Alexander Wolters and Andreas Kupsch and J{\"o}rg M{\"u}ller and K{\"u}hn, {Andrea A} and Gerd-Helge Schneider and Werner Poewe and Sascha Hering and Wilhelm Eisner and Jan-Uwe M{\"u}ller and G{\"u}nther Deuschl and Pinsker, {Marcus O} and Inger-Marie Skogseid and Roeste, {Geir Ketil} and Martin Krause and Volker Tronnier and Alfons Schnitzler and J{\"u}rgen Voges and Guido Nikkhah and Jan Vesper and Joseph Classen and Markus Naumann and Reiner Benecke and {DBS study group for dystonia}",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",
year = "2012",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70257-0",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "1029--38",
journal = "LANCET NEUROL",
issn = "1474-4422",
publisher = "Lancet Publishing Group",
number = "12",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pallidal deep brain stimulation in patients with primary generalised or segmental dystonia

T2 - 5-year follow-up of a randomised trial

AU - Volkmann, Jens

AU - Wolters, Alexander

AU - Kupsch, Andreas

AU - Müller, Jörg

AU - Kühn, Andrea A

AU - Schneider, Gerd-Helge

AU - Poewe, Werner

AU - Hering, Sascha

AU - Eisner, Wilhelm

AU - Müller, Jan-Uwe

AU - Deuschl, Günther

AU - Pinsker, Marcus O

AU - Skogseid, Inger-Marie

AU - Roeste, Geir Ketil

AU - Krause, Martin

AU - Tronnier, Volker

AU - Schnitzler, Alfons

AU - Voges, Jürgen

AU - Nikkhah, Guido

AU - Vesper, Jan

AU - Classen, Joseph

AU - Naumann, Markus

AU - Benecke, Reiner

AU - DBS study group for dystonia

N1 - Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

PY - 2012/12

Y1 - 2012/12

N2 - BACKGROUND: Severe forms of primary dystonia are difficult to manage medically. We assessed the safety and efficacy of pallidal neurostimulation in patients with primary generalised or segmental dystonia prospectively followed up for 5 years in a controlled multicentre trial.METHODS: In the parent trial, 40 patients were randomly assigned to either sham neurostimulation or neurostimulation of the internal globus pallidus for a period of 3 months and thereafter all patients completed 6 months of active neurostimulation. 38 patients agreed to be followed up annually after the activation of neurostimulation, including assessments of dystonia severity, pain, disability, and quality of life. The primary endpoint of the 5-year follow-up study extension was the change in dystonia severity at 3 years and 5 years as assessed by open-label ratings of the Burke-Fahn-Marsden dystonia rating scale (BFMDRS) motor score compared with the preoperative baseline and the 6-month visit. The primary endpoint was analysed on an intention-to-treat basis. The original trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00142259).FINDINGS: An intention-to-treat analysis including all patients from the parent trial showed significant improvements in dystonia severity at 3 years and 5 years compared with baseline, which corresponded to -20·8 points (SD 17·1; -47·9%; n=40) at 6 months; -26·5 points (19·7; -61·1%; n=31) at 3 years; and -25·1 points (21·3; -57·8%; n=32). The improvement from 6 months to 3 years (-5·7 points [SD 8·4]; -34%) was significant and sustained at the 5-year follow-up (-4·3 [10·4]). 49 new adverse events occurred between 6 months and 5 years. Dysarthria and transient worsening of dystonia were the most common non-serious adverse events. 21 adverse events were rated serious and were almost exclusively device related. One patient attempted suicide shortly after the 6-month visit during a depressive episode. All serious adverse events resolved without permanent sequelae.INTERPRETATION: 3 years and 5 years after surgery, pallidal neurostimulation continues to be an effective and relatively safe treatment option for patients with severe idiopathic dystonia. This long-term observation provides further evidence in favour of pallidal neurostimulation as a first-line treatment for patients with medically intractable, segmental, or generalised dystonia.FUNDING: Medtronic.

AB - BACKGROUND: Severe forms of primary dystonia are difficult to manage medically. We assessed the safety and efficacy of pallidal neurostimulation in patients with primary generalised or segmental dystonia prospectively followed up for 5 years in a controlled multicentre trial.METHODS: In the parent trial, 40 patients were randomly assigned to either sham neurostimulation or neurostimulation of the internal globus pallidus for a period of 3 months and thereafter all patients completed 6 months of active neurostimulation. 38 patients agreed to be followed up annually after the activation of neurostimulation, including assessments of dystonia severity, pain, disability, and quality of life. The primary endpoint of the 5-year follow-up study extension was the change in dystonia severity at 3 years and 5 years as assessed by open-label ratings of the Burke-Fahn-Marsden dystonia rating scale (BFMDRS) motor score compared with the preoperative baseline and the 6-month visit. The primary endpoint was analysed on an intention-to-treat basis. The original trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00142259).FINDINGS: An intention-to-treat analysis including all patients from the parent trial showed significant improvements in dystonia severity at 3 years and 5 years compared with baseline, which corresponded to -20·8 points (SD 17·1; -47·9%; n=40) at 6 months; -26·5 points (19·7; -61·1%; n=31) at 3 years; and -25·1 points (21·3; -57·8%; n=32). The improvement from 6 months to 3 years (-5·7 points [SD 8·4]; -34%) was significant and sustained at the 5-year follow-up (-4·3 [10·4]). 49 new adverse events occurred between 6 months and 5 years. Dysarthria and transient worsening of dystonia were the most common non-serious adverse events. 21 adverse events were rated serious and were almost exclusively device related. One patient attempted suicide shortly after the 6-month visit during a depressive episode. All serious adverse events resolved without permanent sequelae.INTERPRETATION: 3 years and 5 years after surgery, pallidal neurostimulation continues to be an effective and relatively safe treatment option for patients with severe idiopathic dystonia. This long-term observation provides further evidence in favour of pallidal neurostimulation as a first-line treatment for patients with medically intractable, segmental, or generalised dystonia.FUNDING: Medtronic.

KW - Adult

KW - Deep Brain Stimulation

KW - Dystonic Disorders

KW - Female

KW - Follow-Up Studies

KW - Globus Pallidus

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Prospective Studies

KW - Treatment Outcome

KW - Young Adult

KW - Journal Article

KW - Multicenter Study

KW - Randomized Controlled Trial

KW - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

U2 - 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70257-0

DO - 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70257-0

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 23123071

VL - 11

SP - 1029

EP - 1038

JO - LANCET NEUROL

JF - LANCET NEUROL

SN - 1474-4422

IS - 12

ER -