Outcomes in patients experiencing complications associated with atrial fibrillation ablation: Data from the German ablation registry

Standard

Outcomes in patients experiencing complications associated with atrial fibrillation ablation: Data from the German ablation registry. / Kany, Shinwan; Kuck, Karl-Heinz; Brachmann, Johannes; Andresen, Dietrich; Willems, Stephan; Eckardt, Lars; Hochadel, Matthias; Senges, Jochen; Metzner, Andreas; Rillig, Andreas.

In: INT J CARDIOL, Vol. 363, 15.09.2022, p. 64-70.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{6b8861d2ed564c509b070e338c7a8ad4,
title = "Outcomes in patients experiencing complications associated with atrial fibrillation ablation: Data from the German ablation registry",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: This study aims to report on the clinical and patient-reported outcomes in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation with moderate or severe complications.METHODS: The prospective, multicentre German Ablation Registry of patients undergoing catheter ablation was studied to compare outcomes of patients with moderate or severe complications (group I) and patients without or minor complications (group II).RESULTS: A total of 3865 patients (group I = 158, group II = 3707) were included in this analysis. Procedural success (92.4% vs 96.1%, p = 0.019) was lower and arrhythmia recurrence before discharge significantly higher in group I (15.8% vs 6.5%, p < 0.001). Hospital stays were longer in in group I (6 days vs 3 days, p < 0.001). The in-hospital rate of death, myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke was 6.4% in group I. Age was an independent predictor of in-hospital complications (HR1.43, 95% CI 1.18-1.72). In the 1-year follow-up, the composite outcome of death, MI, stroke, or major bleeding (8.5% vs 1.5%, p < 0.001) was significantly higher in group I. The majority of patients were still feeling safe during treatment regardless of occurred complications (88.4% vs 94.0%, p = 0.14) and would choose the same centre again in most cases (90.7% vs 92.9%, p = 0.59). Patients reported no or improved symptoms in both cohorts (77.3% vs 78.6%) without significant differences.CONCLUSION: Cardiovascular events in patients with severe complications are more common but patient satisfaction and symptomatic relief are high and comparable to those without complications.",
author = "Shinwan Kany and Karl-Heinz Kuck and Johannes Brachmann and Dietrich Andresen and Stephan Willems and Lars Eckardt and Matthias Hochadel and Jochen Senges and Andreas Metzner and Andreas Rillig",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2022. Published by Elsevier B.V.",
year = "2022",
month = sep,
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.06.019",
language = "English",
volume = "363",
pages = "64--70",
journal = "INT J CARDIOL",
issn = "0167-5273",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Outcomes in patients experiencing complications associated with atrial fibrillation ablation: Data from the German ablation registry

AU - Kany, Shinwan

AU - Kuck, Karl-Heinz

AU - Brachmann, Johannes

AU - Andresen, Dietrich

AU - Willems, Stephan

AU - Eckardt, Lars

AU - Hochadel, Matthias

AU - Senges, Jochen

AU - Metzner, Andreas

AU - Rillig, Andreas

N1 - Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier B.V.

PY - 2022/9/15

Y1 - 2022/9/15

N2 - BACKGROUND: This study aims to report on the clinical and patient-reported outcomes in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation with moderate or severe complications.METHODS: The prospective, multicentre German Ablation Registry of patients undergoing catheter ablation was studied to compare outcomes of patients with moderate or severe complications (group I) and patients without or minor complications (group II).RESULTS: A total of 3865 patients (group I = 158, group II = 3707) were included in this analysis. Procedural success (92.4% vs 96.1%, p = 0.019) was lower and arrhythmia recurrence before discharge significantly higher in group I (15.8% vs 6.5%, p < 0.001). Hospital stays were longer in in group I (6 days vs 3 days, p < 0.001). The in-hospital rate of death, myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke was 6.4% in group I. Age was an independent predictor of in-hospital complications (HR1.43, 95% CI 1.18-1.72). In the 1-year follow-up, the composite outcome of death, MI, stroke, or major bleeding (8.5% vs 1.5%, p < 0.001) was significantly higher in group I. The majority of patients were still feeling safe during treatment regardless of occurred complications (88.4% vs 94.0%, p = 0.14) and would choose the same centre again in most cases (90.7% vs 92.9%, p = 0.59). Patients reported no or improved symptoms in both cohorts (77.3% vs 78.6%) without significant differences.CONCLUSION: Cardiovascular events in patients with severe complications are more common but patient satisfaction and symptomatic relief are high and comparable to those without complications.

AB - BACKGROUND: This study aims to report on the clinical and patient-reported outcomes in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation with moderate or severe complications.METHODS: The prospective, multicentre German Ablation Registry of patients undergoing catheter ablation was studied to compare outcomes of patients with moderate or severe complications (group I) and patients without or minor complications (group II).RESULTS: A total of 3865 patients (group I = 158, group II = 3707) were included in this analysis. Procedural success (92.4% vs 96.1%, p = 0.019) was lower and arrhythmia recurrence before discharge significantly higher in group I (15.8% vs 6.5%, p < 0.001). Hospital stays were longer in in group I (6 days vs 3 days, p < 0.001). The in-hospital rate of death, myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke was 6.4% in group I. Age was an independent predictor of in-hospital complications (HR1.43, 95% CI 1.18-1.72). In the 1-year follow-up, the composite outcome of death, MI, stroke, or major bleeding (8.5% vs 1.5%, p < 0.001) was significantly higher in group I. The majority of patients were still feeling safe during treatment regardless of occurred complications (88.4% vs 94.0%, p = 0.14) and would choose the same centre again in most cases (90.7% vs 92.9%, p = 0.59). Patients reported no or improved symptoms in both cohorts (77.3% vs 78.6%) without significant differences.CONCLUSION: Cardiovascular events in patients with severe complications are more common but patient satisfaction and symptomatic relief are high and comparable to those without complications.

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.06.019

DO - 10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.06.019

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 35705169

VL - 363

SP - 64

EP - 70

JO - INT J CARDIOL

JF - INT J CARDIOL

SN - 0167-5273

ER -