Oral health-related quality of life in subjects with implant-supported prostheses. A systematic review

Daniel R Reissmann; Michel Dard; Ragna Lamprecht; Julia Struppek; Guido Heydecke

doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2017.08.003

Oral health-related quality of life in subjects with implant-supported prostheses. A systematic review

Standard

In: J DENT, Vol. 65, 10.2017, p. 22-40.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journal › SCORING: Review article › Research

Harvard

Reissmann, DR, Dard, M, Lamprecht, R, Struppek, J & Heydecke, G 2017, 'Oral health-related quality of life in subjects with implant-supported prostheses. A systematic review', J DENT, vol. 65, pp. 22-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2017.08.003

APA

Reissmann, D. R., Dard, M., Lamprecht, R., Struppek, J., & Heydecke, G. (2017). Oral health-related quality of life in subjects with implant-supported prostheses. A systematic review. J DENT, 65, 22-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2017.08.003

Vancouver

Reissmann DR, Dard M, Lamprecht R, Struppek J, Heydecke G. Oral health-related quality of life in subjects with implant-supported prostheses. A systematic review. J DENT. 2017 Oct;65:22-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2017.08.003

Bibtex

@article{d5f918c3749c4618bb0d5a651a1ba320,

title = "Oral health-related quality of life in subjects with implant-supported prostheses. A systematic review",

abstract = "OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to review the current literature relating to the impact of dental implants on oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in edentulous or partially dentate patients.DATA/SOURCES: Systematic literature searches were performed in the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases, using high level MeSH terms. The searches were limited to studies published in English from 1960 to June 11, 2017, reporting OHRQoL outcomes using validated instruments, and having enrolled at least 50 patients.STUDY SELECTION: After removal of duplicates, a total of 2,827 unique hits were identified. After title, abstract, and full text screening, 63 articles were included in the review presenting findings of 55 individual studies. The provision of implant-supported dentures was associated with a significant increase in OHRQoL in partially dentate and in edentulous patients, with the magnitude of achieved improvement typically being greater for implant-supported dentures than with conventional ones. Furthermore, OHRQoL impairment prior to treatment was strongly associated with OHRQoL improvement.CONCLUSION: For partially dentate patients, there is not enough evidence that implant-supported FDP are superior in terms of OHRQoL than conventional FDP, but moderate evidence suggests that implant-supported FDP perform better than conventional RDP. In edentulous patients, evidence suggests that only if OHRQoL at baseline is highly impaired and patients request implant treatment, IOD are superior than CD in terms of treatment-induced OHRQoL improvement.CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Patients can be informed that implant treatment is usually related to a significant improvement in OHRQoL. However, improvement is not necessarily higher than for conventional prosthodontic treatments but depends on patient's clinical and psychosocial characteristics.",

keywords = "Journal Article, Review",

author = "Reissmann, {Daniel R} and Michel Dard and Ragna Lamprecht and Julia Struppek and Guido Heydecke",

year = "2017",

month = oct,

doi = "10.1016/j.jdent.2017.08.003",

language = "English",

volume = "65",

pages = "22--40",

journal = "J DENT",

issn = "0300-5712",

publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Oral health-related quality of life in subjects with implant-supported prostheses. A systematic review

AU - Reissmann, Daniel R

AU - Dard, Michel

AU - Lamprecht, Ragna

AU - Struppek, Julia

AU - Heydecke, Guido

PY - 2017/10

Y1 - 2017/10

N2 - OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to review the current literature relating to the impact of dental implants on oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in edentulous or partially dentate patients.DATA/SOURCES: Systematic literature searches were performed in the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases, using high level MeSH terms. The searches were limited to studies published in English from 1960 to June 11, 2017, reporting OHRQoL outcomes using validated instruments, and having enrolled at least 50 patients.STUDY SELECTION: After removal of duplicates, a total of 2,827 unique hits were identified. After title, abstract, and full text screening, 63 articles were included in the review presenting findings of 55 individual studies. The provision of implant-supported dentures was associated with a significant increase in OHRQoL in partially dentate and in edentulous patients, with the magnitude of achieved improvement typically being greater for implant-supported dentures than with conventional ones. Furthermore, OHRQoL impairment prior to treatment was strongly associated with OHRQoL improvement.CONCLUSION: For partially dentate patients, there is not enough evidence that implant-supported FDP are superior in terms of OHRQoL than conventional FDP, but moderate evidence suggests that implant-supported FDP perform better than conventional RDP. In edentulous patients, evidence suggests that only if OHRQoL at baseline is highly impaired and patients request implant treatment, IOD are superior than CD in terms of treatment-induced OHRQoL improvement.CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Patients can be informed that implant treatment is usually related to a significant improvement in OHRQoL. However, improvement is not necessarily higher than for conventional prosthodontic treatments but depends on patient's clinical and psychosocial characteristics.

AB - OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to review the current literature relating to the impact of dental implants on oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in edentulous or partially dentate patients.DATA/SOURCES: Systematic literature searches were performed in the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases, using high level MeSH terms. The searches were limited to studies published in English from 1960 to June 11, 2017, reporting OHRQoL outcomes using validated instruments, and having enrolled at least 50 patients.STUDY SELECTION: After removal of duplicates, a total of 2,827 unique hits were identified. After title, abstract, and full text screening, 63 articles were included in the review presenting findings of 55 individual studies. The provision of implant-supported dentures was associated with a significant increase in OHRQoL in partially dentate and in edentulous patients, with the magnitude of achieved improvement typically being greater for implant-supported dentures than with conventional ones. Furthermore, OHRQoL impairment prior to treatment was strongly associated with OHRQoL improvement.CONCLUSION: For partially dentate patients, there is not enough evidence that implant-supported FDP are superior in terms of OHRQoL than conventional FDP, but moderate evidence suggests that implant-supported FDP perform better than conventional RDP. In edentulous patients, evidence suggests that only if OHRQoL at baseline is highly impaired and patients request implant treatment, IOD are superior than CD in terms of treatment-induced OHRQoL improvement.CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Patients can be informed that implant treatment is usually related to a significant improvement in OHRQoL. However, improvement is not necessarily higher than for conventional prosthodontic treatments but depends on patient's clinical and psychosocial characteristics.

KW - Journal Article

KW - Review

U2 - 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.08.003

DO - 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.08.003

M3 - SCORING: Review article

C2 - 28789860

VL - 65

SP - 22

EP - 40

JO - J DENT

JF - J DENT

SN - 0300-5712

ER -