Optimal catchment area and primary PCI centre volume revisited: a single-centre experience in transition from high-volume centre to "mega centre" for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Standard

Optimal catchment area and primary PCI centre volume revisited: a single-centre experience in transition from high-volume centre to "mega centre" for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. / Schoos, Mikkel Malby; Pedersen, Frants; Holmvang, Lene; Engstrøm, Thomas; Saunamaki, Kari; Helqvist, Steffen; Kastrup, Jens; Mehran, Roxana; Dangas, George; Jørgensen, Erik; Kelbæk, Henning; Clemmensen, Peter.

In: EUROINTERVENTION, Vol. 11, No. 5, 09.2015, p. 503-10.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{718c40fb73a64db09ab285942d047f33,
title = "Optimal catchment area and primary PCI centre volume revisited: a single-centre experience in transition from high-volume centre to {"}mega centre{"} for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction",
abstract = "AIMS: The currently stated optimal catchment population for a pPCI centre is 300,000-1,100,000, resulting in 200-800 procedures/year. pPCI centres are increasing in number even within small geographic areas. We describe the organisation and quality of care after merging two high-volume centres, creating one mega centre serving 2.5 million inhabitants, and performing ~1,000 procedures/year.METHODS AND RESULTS: In this descriptive cohort study, we linked individual-level data from the national Central Population Register holding survival status with our in-hospital dedicated PCI database of baseline, organisational and procedural characteristics. Quality measures were treatment delays and 30-day all-cause mortality. In the three-year study period, 2,066 consecutive pPCIs were performed. After the fusion of the two centres, pPCI procedures increased by 102%, while door-to-balloon remained stable at 32 minutes. Up to 75.1% of patients were directly transferred by pre-hospital triage, of whom 82.7% had ECG-to-balloon <120 min, 92.6% had door-to-balloon <60 min. Thirty-day all-cause mortality remained low at 6.3%.CONCLUSIONS: This study challenges the stated maximal pPCI centre volume. The quality of a centre reflects governance, training, resources and pre-hospital triage, rather than catchment population and STEMI incidence, as long as a minimum volume is guaranteed. Resources can be utilised better by merging neighbouring centres, without negative effects on quality of care.",
keywords = "Aged, Catchment Area, Health, Cohort Studies, Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration, Electrocardiography, Emergency Medical Services, Female, Humans, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Male, Middle Aged, Mortality, Multivariate Analysis, Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/statistics & numerical data, Proportional Hazards Models, Registries, Time-to-Treatment/statistics & numerical data, Triage",
author = "Schoos, {Mikkel Malby} and Frants Pedersen and Lene Holmvang and Thomas Engstr{\o}m and Kari Saunamaki and Steffen Helqvist and Jens Kastrup and Roxana Mehran and George Dangas and Erik J{\o}rgensen and Henning Kelb{\ae}k and Peter Clemmensen",
year = "2015",
month = sep,
doi = "10.4244/EIJY14M11_07",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "503--10",
journal = "EUROINTERVENTION",
issn = "1774-024X",
publisher = "EUROPA EDITION",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Optimal catchment area and primary PCI centre volume revisited: a single-centre experience in transition from high-volume centre to "mega centre" for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

AU - Schoos, Mikkel Malby

AU - Pedersen, Frants

AU - Holmvang, Lene

AU - Engstrøm, Thomas

AU - Saunamaki, Kari

AU - Helqvist, Steffen

AU - Kastrup, Jens

AU - Mehran, Roxana

AU - Dangas, George

AU - Jørgensen, Erik

AU - Kelbæk, Henning

AU - Clemmensen, Peter

PY - 2015/9

Y1 - 2015/9

N2 - AIMS: The currently stated optimal catchment population for a pPCI centre is 300,000-1,100,000, resulting in 200-800 procedures/year. pPCI centres are increasing in number even within small geographic areas. We describe the organisation and quality of care after merging two high-volume centres, creating one mega centre serving 2.5 million inhabitants, and performing ~1,000 procedures/year.METHODS AND RESULTS: In this descriptive cohort study, we linked individual-level data from the national Central Population Register holding survival status with our in-hospital dedicated PCI database of baseline, organisational and procedural characteristics. Quality measures were treatment delays and 30-day all-cause mortality. In the three-year study period, 2,066 consecutive pPCIs were performed. After the fusion of the two centres, pPCI procedures increased by 102%, while door-to-balloon remained stable at 32 minutes. Up to 75.1% of patients were directly transferred by pre-hospital triage, of whom 82.7% had ECG-to-balloon <120 min, 92.6% had door-to-balloon <60 min. Thirty-day all-cause mortality remained low at 6.3%.CONCLUSIONS: This study challenges the stated maximal pPCI centre volume. The quality of a centre reflects governance, training, resources and pre-hospital triage, rather than catchment population and STEMI incidence, as long as a minimum volume is guaranteed. Resources can be utilised better by merging neighbouring centres, without negative effects on quality of care.

AB - AIMS: The currently stated optimal catchment population for a pPCI centre is 300,000-1,100,000, resulting in 200-800 procedures/year. pPCI centres are increasing in number even within small geographic areas. We describe the organisation and quality of care after merging two high-volume centres, creating one mega centre serving 2.5 million inhabitants, and performing ~1,000 procedures/year.METHODS AND RESULTS: In this descriptive cohort study, we linked individual-level data from the national Central Population Register holding survival status with our in-hospital dedicated PCI database of baseline, organisational and procedural characteristics. Quality measures were treatment delays and 30-day all-cause mortality. In the three-year study period, 2,066 consecutive pPCIs were performed. After the fusion of the two centres, pPCI procedures increased by 102%, while door-to-balloon remained stable at 32 minutes. Up to 75.1% of patients were directly transferred by pre-hospital triage, of whom 82.7% had ECG-to-balloon <120 min, 92.6% had door-to-balloon <60 min. Thirty-day all-cause mortality remained low at 6.3%.CONCLUSIONS: This study challenges the stated maximal pPCI centre volume. The quality of a centre reflects governance, training, resources and pre-hospital triage, rather than catchment population and STEMI incidence, as long as a minimum volume is guaranteed. Resources can be utilised better by merging neighbouring centres, without negative effects on quality of care.

KW - Aged

KW - Catchment Area, Health

KW - Cohort Studies

KW - Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration

KW - Electrocardiography

KW - Emergency Medical Services

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Kaplan-Meier Estimate

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Mortality

KW - Multivariate Analysis

KW - Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis

KW - Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/statistics & numerical data

KW - Proportional Hazards Models

KW - Registries

KW - Time-to-Treatment/statistics & numerical data

KW - Triage

U2 - 10.4244/EIJY14M11_07

DO - 10.4244/EIJY14M11_07

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 25420787

VL - 11

SP - 503

EP - 510

JO - EUROINTERVENTION

JF - EUROINTERVENTION

SN - 1774-024X

IS - 5

ER -