Opposing prognostic relevance of junction plakoglobin in distinct prostate cancer patient subsets

Standard

Opposing prognostic relevance of junction plakoglobin in distinct prostate cancer patient subsets. / Spethmann, Tanja; Böckelmann, Lukas Clemens; Labitzky, Vera; Ahlers, Ann-Kristin; Schröder-Schwarz, Jennifer; Bonk, Sarah; Simon, Ronald; Sauter, Guido; Huland, Hartwig; Kypta, Robert; Schumacher, Udo; Lange, Tobias.

In: MOL ONCOL, Vol. 15, No. 7, 07.2021, p. 1956-1969.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{c0e76ca3cd424931ac862ea3505c2f23,
title = "Opposing prognostic relevance of junction plakoglobin in distinct prostate cancer patient subsets",
abstract = "Both oncogenic and tumor suppressor functions have been described for junction plakoglobin (JUP), also known as γ-catenin. To clarify the role of JUP in prostate cancer, JUP protein expression was immunohistochemically detected in a tissue microarray containing 11 267 individual prostatectomy specimens. Considering all patients, high JUP expression was associated with adverse tumor stage (P = 0.0002), high Gleason grade (P < 0.0001), and lymph node metastases (P = 0.011). These associations were driven mainly by the subset without TMPRSS2:ERG fusion, in which high JUP expression was an independent predictor of poor prognosis (multivariate analyses, P = 0.0054) and early biochemical recurrence (P = 0.0003). High JUP expression was further linked to strong androgen receptor expression (P < 0.0001), high cell proliferation, and PTEN and FOXP1 deletion (P < 0.0001). In the ERG-negative subset, high JUP expression was additionally linked to MAP3K7 (P = 0.0007) and CHD1 deletion (P = 0.0021). Contrasting the overall prognostic effect of JUP, low JUP expression indicated poor prognosis in the fraction of CHD1-deleted patients (P = 0.039). In this subset, the association of high JUP and high cell proliferation was specifically absent. In conclusion, the controversial biological roles of JUP are reflected by antagonistic prognostic effects in distinct prostate cancer patient subsets.",
author = "Tanja Spethmann and B{\"o}ckelmann, {Lukas Clemens} and Vera Labitzky and Ann-Kristin Ahlers and Jennifer Schr{\"o}der-Schwarz and Sarah Bonk and Ronald Simon and Guido Sauter and Hartwig Huland and Robert Kypta and Udo Schumacher and Tobias Lange",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2021 The Authors. Molecular Oncology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Federation of European Biochemical Societies.",
year = "2021",
month = jul,
doi = "10.1002/1878-0261.12922",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "1956--1969",
journal = "MOL ONCOL",
issn = "1574-7891",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "7",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Opposing prognostic relevance of junction plakoglobin in distinct prostate cancer patient subsets

AU - Spethmann, Tanja

AU - Böckelmann, Lukas Clemens

AU - Labitzky, Vera

AU - Ahlers, Ann-Kristin

AU - Schröder-Schwarz, Jennifer

AU - Bonk, Sarah

AU - Simon, Ronald

AU - Sauter, Guido

AU - Huland, Hartwig

AU - Kypta, Robert

AU - Schumacher, Udo

AU - Lange, Tobias

N1 - © 2021 The Authors. Molecular Oncology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Federation of European Biochemical Societies.

PY - 2021/7

Y1 - 2021/7

N2 - Both oncogenic and tumor suppressor functions have been described for junction plakoglobin (JUP), also known as γ-catenin. To clarify the role of JUP in prostate cancer, JUP protein expression was immunohistochemically detected in a tissue microarray containing 11 267 individual prostatectomy specimens. Considering all patients, high JUP expression was associated with adverse tumor stage (P = 0.0002), high Gleason grade (P < 0.0001), and lymph node metastases (P = 0.011). These associations were driven mainly by the subset without TMPRSS2:ERG fusion, in which high JUP expression was an independent predictor of poor prognosis (multivariate analyses, P = 0.0054) and early biochemical recurrence (P = 0.0003). High JUP expression was further linked to strong androgen receptor expression (P < 0.0001), high cell proliferation, and PTEN and FOXP1 deletion (P < 0.0001). In the ERG-negative subset, high JUP expression was additionally linked to MAP3K7 (P = 0.0007) and CHD1 deletion (P = 0.0021). Contrasting the overall prognostic effect of JUP, low JUP expression indicated poor prognosis in the fraction of CHD1-deleted patients (P = 0.039). In this subset, the association of high JUP and high cell proliferation was specifically absent. In conclusion, the controversial biological roles of JUP are reflected by antagonistic prognostic effects in distinct prostate cancer patient subsets.

AB - Both oncogenic and tumor suppressor functions have been described for junction plakoglobin (JUP), also known as γ-catenin. To clarify the role of JUP in prostate cancer, JUP protein expression was immunohistochemically detected in a tissue microarray containing 11 267 individual prostatectomy specimens. Considering all patients, high JUP expression was associated with adverse tumor stage (P = 0.0002), high Gleason grade (P < 0.0001), and lymph node metastases (P = 0.011). These associations were driven mainly by the subset without TMPRSS2:ERG fusion, in which high JUP expression was an independent predictor of poor prognosis (multivariate analyses, P = 0.0054) and early biochemical recurrence (P = 0.0003). High JUP expression was further linked to strong androgen receptor expression (P < 0.0001), high cell proliferation, and PTEN and FOXP1 deletion (P < 0.0001). In the ERG-negative subset, high JUP expression was additionally linked to MAP3K7 (P = 0.0007) and CHD1 deletion (P = 0.0021). Contrasting the overall prognostic effect of JUP, low JUP expression indicated poor prognosis in the fraction of CHD1-deleted patients (P = 0.039). In this subset, the association of high JUP and high cell proliferation was specifically absent. In conclusion, the controversial biological roles of JUP are reflected by antagonistic prognostic effects in distinct prostate cancer patient subsets.

U2 - 10.1002/1878-0261.12922

DO - 10.1002/1878-0261.12922

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 33533127

VL - 15

SP - 1956

EP - 1969

JO - MOL ONCOL

JF - MOL ONCOL

SN - 1574-7891

IS - 7

ER -