Oncologic Outcomes of Lymph Node Dissection at Salvage Radical Prostatectomy

  • Felix Preisser (Shared first author)
  • Reha-Baris Incesu (Shared first author)
  • Pawel Rajwa
  • Marcin Chlosta
  • Mohamed Ahmed
  • Andre Luis Abreu
  • Giovanni Cacciamani
  • Luis Ribeiro
  • Alexander Kretschmer
  • Thilo Westhofen
  • Joseph A Smith
  • Markus Graefen
  • Giorgio Calleris
  • Yannic Raskin
  • Paolo Gontero
  • Steven Joniau
  • Rafael Sanchez-Salas
  • Shahrokh F Shariat
  • Inderbir Gill
  • Robert Jeffrey Karnes
  • Paul Cathcart
  • Henk Van Der Poel
  • Giancarlo Marra
  • Derya Tilki

Related Research units

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lymph node invasion (LNI) represents a poor prognostic factor after primary radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer (PCa). However, the impact of LNI on oncologic outcomes in salvage radical prostatectomy (SRP) patients is unknown.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of lymph node dissection (LND) and pathological lymph node status (pNX vs. pN0 vs. pN1) on long-term oncologic outcomes of SRP patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent SRP for recurrent PCa between 2000 and 2021 were identified from 12 high-volume centers. Kaplan-Meier analyses and multivariable Cox regression models were used. Endpoints were biochemical recurrence (BCR), overall survival (OS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS).

RESULTS: Of 853 SRP patients, 87% (n = 727) underwent LND, and 21% (n = 151) harbored LNI. The median follow-up was 27 months. The mean number of removed lymph nodes was 13 in the LND cohort. At 72 months after SRP, BCR-free survival was 54% vs. 47% vs. 7.2% for patients with pNX vs. pN0 vs. pN1 (p < 0.001), respectively. At 120 months after SRP, OS rates were 89% vs. 81% vs. 41% (p < 0.001), and CSS rates were 94% vs. 96% vs. 82% (p = 0.02) for patients with pNX vs. pN0 vs. pN1, respectively. In multivariable Cox regression analyses, pN1 status was independently associated with BCR (HR: 1.77, p < 0.001) and death (HR: 2.89, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS: In SRP patients, LNI represents an independent poor prognostic factor. However, the oncologic benefit of LND in SRP remains debatable. These findings underline the need for a cautious LND indication in SRP patients as well as strict postoperative monitoring of SRP patients with LNI.

Bibliographical data

Original languageEnglish
Article number3123
ISSN2072-6694
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 09.06.2023
PubMed 37370733