Oncologic and Functional Outcomes after Radical Prostatectomy for High or Very High Risk Prostate Cancer

Standard

Oncologic and Functional Outcomes after Radical Prostatectomy for High or Very High Risk Prostate Cancer : European Validation of the Current NCCN® Guideline. / Pompe, Raisa Sinaida; Karakiewicz, Pierre I; Tian, Zhe; Mandel, Philipp; Steuber, Thomas; Schlomm, Thorsten; Salomon, Georg; Graefen, Markus; Huland, Hartwig; Tilki, Derya.

In: J UROLOGY, Vol. 198, No. 2, 08.2017, p. 354-361.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Pompe, RS, Karakiewicz, PI, Tian, Z, Mandel, P, Steuber, T, Schlomm, T, Salomon, G, Graefen, M, Huland, H & Tilki, D 2017, 'Oncologic and Functional Outcomes after Radical Prostatectomy for High or Very High Risk Prostate Cancer: European Validation of the Current NCCN® Guideline', J UROLOGY, vol. 198, no. 2, pp. 354-361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.02.070

APA

Pompe, R. S., Karakiewicz, P. I., Tian, Z., Mandel, P., Steuber, T., Schlomm, T., Salomon, G., Graefen, M., Huland, H., & Tilki, D. (2017). Oncologic and Functional Outcomes after Radical Prostatectomy for High or Very High Risk Prostate Cancer: European Validation of the Current NCCN® Guideline. J UROLOGY, 198(2), 354-361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.02.070

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{f18dc3e495d8401fab8559fa586088d9,
title = "Oncologic and Functional Outcomes after Radical Prostatectomy for High or Very High Risk Prostate Cancer: European Validation of the Current NCCN{\textregistered} Guideline",
abstract = "PURPOSE: We validated the current NCCN (National Comprehensive Cancer Network{\textregistered}) classification of very high risk patients, and compared the pathological, functional and oncologic outcomes between surgically treated high risk and very high risk patients.MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 4,041 patients stratified into high risk or very high risk groups who underwent radical prostatectomy between 1992 and 2016. Kaplan-Meier as well as multivariable logistic and Cox regression analyses were used to compare outcomes between the groups.RESULTS: After radical prostatectomy the rate of adverse pathological features was higher in 1,369 very high risk vs 2,672 high risk cases. Functional outcomes were similar between the groups, with 1-year continence and potency rates of 81.0% and 43.6% in the very high risk compared to 81.9% and 45.2% in the high risk group, respectively (p = 0.7 and p = 0.9). In a subset of 1,835 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy between 1992 and 2011 (median followup 58.8 months, IQR 36.5-84.6), those with very high risk disease had significantly worse 5 and 8-year biochemical recurrence-free survival, metastatic progression-free survival, prostate cancer specific mortality-free survival and overall survival rates compared to those with high risk disease.CONCLUSIONS: Despite the relatively poor prognosis of patients with high risk prostate cancer, radical prostatectomy results in favorable 5 and 8-year metastatic progression-free survival, prostate cancer specific mortality-free survival and overall survival rates. Relative to high risk cases, their very high risk counterparts have significantly worse pathological and oncologic outcomes, and more frequently require additional therapies. These observations validate the stratification between high risk and very high risk in European patients with prostate cancer. Interestingly, very high risk patients treated with radical prostatectomy did not have a worse functional outcome than their high risk counterparts.",
keywords = "Journal Article",
author = "Pompe, {Raisa Sinaida} and Karakiewicz, {Pierre I} and Zhe Tian and Philipp Mandel and Thomas Steuber and Thorsten Schlomm and Georg Salomon and Markus Graefen and Hartwig Huland and Derya Tilki",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2017 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",
year = "2017",
month = aug,
doi = "10.1016/j.juro.2017.02.070",
language = "English",
volume = "198",
pages = "354--361",
journal = "J UROLOGY",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Oncologic and Functional Outcomes after Radical Prostatectomy for High or Very High Risk Prostate Cancer

T2 - European Validation of the Current NCCN® Guideline

AU - Pompe, Raisa Sinaida

AU - Karakiewicz, Pierre I

AU - Tian, Zhe

AU - Mandel, Philipp

AU - Steuber, Thomas

AU - Schlomm, Thorsten

AU - Salomon, Georg

AU - Graefen, Markus

AU - Huland, Hartwig

AU - Tilki, Derya

N1 - Copyright © 2017 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PY - 2017/8

Y1 - 2017/8

N2 - PURPOSE: We validated the current NCCN (National Comprehensive Cancer Network®) classification of very high risk patients, and compared the pathological, functional and oncologic outcomes between surgically treated high risk and very high risk patients.MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 4,041 patients stratified into high risk or very high risk groups who underwent radical prostatectomy between 1992 and 2016. Kaplan-Meier as well as multivariable logistic and Cox regression analyses were used to compare outcomes between the groups.RESULTS: After radical prostatectomy the rate of adverse pathological features was higher in 1,369 very high risk vs 2,672 high risk cases. Functional outcomes were similar between the groups, with 1-year continence and potency rates of 81.0% and 43.6% in the very high risk compared to 81.9% and 45.2% in the high risk group, respectively (p = 0.7 and p = 0.9). In a subset of 1,835 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy between 1992 and 2011 (median followup 58.8 months, IQR 36.5-84.6), those with very high risk disease had significantly worse 5 and 8-year biochemical recurrence-free survival, metastatic progression-free survival, prostate cancer specific mortality-free survival and overall survival rates compared to those with high risk disease.CONCLUSIONS: Despite the relatively poor prognosis of patients with high risk prostate cancer, radical prostatectomy results in favorable 5 and 8-year metastatic progression-free survival, prostate cancer specific mortality-free survival and overall survival rates. Relative to high risk cases, their very high risk counterparts have significantly worse pathological and oncologic outcomes, and more frequently require additional therapies. These observations validate the stratification between high risk and very high risk in European patients with prostate cancer. Interestingly, very high risk patients treated with radical prostatectomy did not have a worse functional outcome than their high risk counterparts.

AB - PURPOSE: We validated the current NCCN (National Comprehensive Cancer Network®) classification of very high risk patients, and compared the pathological, functional and oncologic outcomes between surgically treated high risk and very high risk patients.MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 4,041 patients stratified into high risk or very high risk groups who underwent radical prostatectomy between 1992 and 2016. Kaplan-Meier as well as multivariable logistic and Cox regression analyses were used to compare outcomes between the groups.RESULTS: After radical prostatectomy the rate of adverse pathological features was higher in 1,369 very high risk vs 2,672 high risk cases. Functional outcomes were similar between the groups, with 1-year continence and potency rates of 81.0% and 43.6% in the very high risk compared to 81.9% and 45.2% in the high risk group, respectively (p = 0.7 and p = 0.9). In a subset of 1,835 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy between 1992 and 2011 (median followup 58.8 months, IQR 36.5-84.6), those with very high risk disease had significantly worse 5 and 8-year biochemical recurrence-free survival, metastatic progression-free survival, prostate cancer specific mortality-free survival and overall survival rates compared to those with high risk disease.CONCLUSIONS: Despite the relatively poor prognosis of patients with high risk prostate cancer, radical prostatectomy results in favorable 5 and 8-year metastatic progression-free survival, prostate cancer specific mortality-free survival and overall survival rates. Relative to high risk cases, their very high risk counterparts have significantly worse pathological and oncologic outcomes, and more frequently require additional therapies. These observations validate the stratification between high risk and very high risk in European patients with prostate cancer. Interestingly, very high risk patients treated with radical prostatectomy did not have a worse functional outcome than their high risk counterparts.

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1016/j.juro.2017.02.070

DO - 10.1016/j.juro.2017.02.070

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 28216329

VL - 198

SP - 354

EP - 361

JO - J UROLOGY

JF - J UROLOGY

SN - 0022-5347

IS - 2

ER -