Once-Weekly Insulin Icodec With Dosing Guide App Versus Once-Daily Basal Insulin Analogues in Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes (ONWARDS 5)

Standard

Once-Weekly Insulin Icodec With Dosing Guide App Versus Once-Daily Basal Insulin Analogues in Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes (ONWARDS 5) : A Randomized Trial. / Bajaj, Harpreet S; Aberle, Jens; Davies, Melanie; Donatsky, Anders Meller; Frederiksen, Marie; Yavuz, Dilek G; Gowda, Amoolya; Lingvay, Ildiko; Bode, Bruce.

In: ANN INTERN MED, Vol. 176, No. 11, 11.2023, p. 1476-1485.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Bajaj, HS, Aberle, J, Davies, M, Donatsky, AM, Frederiksen, M, Yavuz, DG, Gowda, A, Lingvay, I & Bode, B 2023, 'Once-Weekly Insulin Icodec With Dosing Guide App Versus Once-Daily Basal Insulin Analogues in Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes (ONWARDS 5): A Randomized Trial', ANN INTERN MED, vol. 176, no. 11, pp. 1476-1485. https://doi.org/10.7326/M23-1288

APA

Bajaj, H. S., Aberle, J., Davies, M., Donatsky, A. M., Frederiksen, M., Yavuz, D. G., Gowda, A., Lingvay, I., & Bode, B. (2023). Once-Weekly Insulin Icodec With Dosing Guide App Versus Once-Daily Basal Insulin Analogues in Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes (ONWARDS 5): A Randomized Trial. ANN INTERN MED, 176(11), 1476-1485. https://doi.org/10.7326/M23-1288

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{f83682d81be3443b81f7fc8f45b5b4ba,
title = "Once-Weekly Insulin Icodec With Dosing Guide App Versus Once-Daily Basal Insulin Analogues in Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes (ONWARDS 5): A Randomized Trial",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Inadequate dose titration and poor adherence to basal insulin can lead to suboptimal glycemic control in persons with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Once-weekly insulin icodec (icodec) is a basal insulin analogue that is in development and is aimed at reducing treatment burden.OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and safety of icodec titrated with a dosing guide app (icodec with app) versus once-daily basal insulin analogues (OD analogues) dosed per standard practice.DESIGN: 52-week, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, phase 3a trial with real-world elements. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04760626).SETTING: 176 sites in 7 countries.PARTICIPANTS: 1085 insulin-naive adults with T2D.INTERVENTION: Icodec with app or OD analogue (insulin degludec, insulin glargine U100, or insulin glargine U300).MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level from baseline to week 52. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported outcomes (Treatment Related Impact Measure for Diabetes [TRIM-D] compliance domain score and change in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire [DTSQ] total treatment satisfaction score).RESULTS: The estimated mean change in HbA1c level from baseline to week 52 was greater with icodec with app than with OD analogues, with noninferiority (P < 0.001) and superiority (P = 0.009) confirmed in prespecified hierarchical testing (estimated treatment difference [ETD], -0.38 percentage points [95% CI, -0.66 to -0.09 percentage points]). At week 52, patient-reported outcomes were more favorable with icodec with app than with OD analogues (ETDs, 3.04 [CI, 1.28 to 4.81] for TRIM-D and 0.78 [CI, 0.10 to 1.47] for DTSQ). Rates of clinically significant or severe hypoglycemia were low and similar with both treatments.LIMITATION: Inability to differentiate the effects of icodec and the dosing guide app.CONCLUSION: Compared with OD analogues, icodec with app showed superior HbA1c reduction and improved treatment satisfaction and compliance with similarly low hypoglycemia rates.PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Novo Nordisk A/S.",
keywords = "Adult, Humans, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy, Hypoglycemia/drug therapy, Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use, Insulin/therapeutic use, Insulin Glargine/therapeutic use, Mobile Applications",
author = "Bajaj, {Harpreet S} and Jens Aberle and Melanie Davies and Donatsky, {Anders Meller} and Marie Frederiksen and Yavuz, {Dilek G} and Amoolya Gowda and Ildiko Lingvay and Bruce Bode",
year = "2023",
month = nov,
doi = "10.7326/M23-1288",
language = "English",
volume = "176",
pages = "1476--1485",
journal = "ANN INTERN MED",
issn = "0003-4819",
publisher = "American College of Physicians",
number = "11",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Once-Weekly Insulin Icodec With Dosing Guide App Versus Once-Daily Basal Insulin Analogues in Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes (ONWARDS 5)

T2 - A Randomized Trial

AU - Bajaj, Harpreet S

AU - Aberle, Jens

AU - Davies, Melanie

AU - Donatsky, Anders Meller

AU - Frederiksen, Marie

AU - Yavuz, Dilek G

AU - Gowda, Amoolya

AU - Lingvay, Ildiko

AU - Bode, Bruce

PY - 2023/11

Y1 - 2023/11

N2 - BACKGROUND: Inadequate dose titration and poor adherence to basal insulin can lead to suboptimal glycemic control in persons with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Once-weekly insulin icodec (icodec) is a basal insulin analogue that is in development and is aimed at reducing treatment burden.OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and safety of icodec titrated with a dosing guide app (icodec with app) versus once-daily basal insulin analogues (OD analogues) dosed per standard practice.DESIGN: 52-week, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, phase 3a trial with real-world elements. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04760626).SETTING: 176 sites in 7 countries.PARTICIPANTS: 1085 insulin-naive adults with T2D.INTERVENTION: Icodec with app or OD analogue (insulin degludec, insulin glargine U100, or insulin glargine U300).MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level from baseline to week 52. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported outcomes (Treatment Related Impact Measure for Diabetes [TRIM-D] compliance domain score and change in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire [DTSQ] total treatment satisfaction score).RESULTS: The estimated mean change in HbA1c level from baseline to week 52 was greater with icodec with app than with OD analogues, with noninferiority (P < 0.001) and superiority (P = 0.009) confirmed in prespecified hierarchical testing (estimated treatment difference [ETD], -0.38 percentage points [95% CI, -0.66 to -0.09 percentage points]). At week 52, patient-reported outcomes were more favorable with icodec with app than with OD analogues (ETDs, 3.04 [CI, 1.28 to 4.81] for TRIM-D and 0.78 [CI, 0.10 to 1.47] for DTSQ). Rates of clinically significant or severe hypoglycemia were low and similar with both treatments.LIMITATION: Inability to differentiate the effects of icodec and the dosing guide app.CONCLUSION: Compared with OD analogues, icodec with app showed superior HbA1c reduction and improved treatment satisfaction and compliance with similarly low hypoglycemia rates.PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Novo Nordisk A/S.

AB - BACKGROUND: Inadequate dose titration and poor adherence to basal insulin can lead to suboptimal glycemic control in persons with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Once-weekly insulin icodec (icodec) is a basal insulin analogue that is in development and is aimed at reducing treatment burden.OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and safety of icodec titrated with a dosing guide app (icodec with app) versus once-daily basal insulin analogues (OD analogues) dosed per standard practice.DESIGN: 52-week, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, phase 3a trial with real-world elements. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04760626).SETTING: 176 sites in 7 countries.PARTICIPANTS: 1085 insulin-naive adults with T2D.INTERVENTION: Icodec with app or OD analogue (insulin degludec, insulin glargine U100, or insulin glargine U300).MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level from baseline to week 52. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported outcomes (Treatment Related Impact Measure for Diabetes [TRIM-D] compliance domain score and change in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire [DTSQ] total treatment satisfaction score).RESULTS: The estimated mean change in HbA1c level from baseline to week 52 was greater with icodec with app than with OD analogues, with noninferiority (P < 0.001) and superiority (P = 0.009) confirmed in prespecified hierarchical testing (estimated treatment difference [ETD], -0.38 percentage points [95% CI, -0.66 to -0.09 percentage points]). At week 52, patient-reported outcomes were more favorable with icodec with app than with OD analogues (ETDs, 3.04 [CI, 1.28 to 4.81] for TRIM-D and 0.78 [CI, 0.10 to 1.47] for DTSQ). Rates of clinically significant or severe hypoglycemia were low and similar with both treatments.LIMITATION: Inability to differentiate the effects of icodec and the dosing guide app.CONCLUSION: Compared with OD analogues, icodec with app showed superior HbA1c reduction and improved treatment satisfaction and compliance with similarly low hypoglycemia rates.PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Novo Nordisk A/S.

KW - Adult

KW - Humans

KW - Blood Glucose

KW - Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy

KW - Hypoglycemia/drug therapy

KW - Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use

KW - Insulin/therapeutic use

KW - Insulin Glargine/therapeutic use

KW - Mobile Applications

U2 - 10.7326/M23-1288

DO - 10.7326/M23-1288

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 37748181

VL - 176

SP - 1476

EP - 1485

JO - ANN INTERN MED

JF - ANN INTERN MED

SN - 0003-4819

IS - 11

ER -