Research ExplorerPublicationsObjective assessment of aesthetic outcome after breast conse...

Objective assessment of aesthetic outcome after breast conserving therapy: subjective third party panel rating and objective BCCT.core software evaluation

Standard

Objective assessment of aesthetic outcome after breast conserving therapy: subjective third party panel rating and objective BCCT.core software evaluation. / Heil, Joerg; Carolus, Anne; Dahlkamp, Julia; Golatta, Michael; Domschke, Christoph; Schuetz, Florian; Blumenstein, Maria; Rauch, Geraldine; Sohn, Christof.

In: BREAST, Vol. 21, No. 1, 02.2012, p. 61-65.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journal › SCORING: Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Heil, J, Carolus, A, Dahlkamp, J, Golatta, M, Domschke, C, Schuetz, F, Blumenstein, M, Rauch, G & Sohn, C 2012, 'Objective assessment of aesthetic outcome after breast conserving therapy: subjective third party panel rating and objective BCCT.core software evaluation', BREAST, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 61-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2011.07.013

APA

Heil, J., Carolus, A., Dahlkamp, J., Golatta, M., Domschke, C., Schuetz, F., Blumenstein, M., Rauch, G., & Sohn, C. (2012). Objective assessment of aesthetic outcome after breast conserving therapy: subjective third party panel rating and objective BCCT.core software evaluation. BREAST, 21(1), 61-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2011.07.013

Vancouver

Heil J, Carolus A, Dahlkamp J, Golatta M, Domschke C, Schuetz F et al. Objective assessment of aesthetic outcome after breast conserving therapy: subjective third party panel rating and objective BCCT.core software evaluation. BREAST. 2012 Feb;21(1):61-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2011.07.013

Bibtex

@article{c9e16f4bf3a84a77af468c38feb651a5,
title = "Objective assessment of aesthetic outcome after breast conserving therapy: subjective third party panel rating and objective BCCT.core software evaluation",
abstract = "We analysed intra- and inter-rater agreement of subjective third party assessment and agreement with a semi-automated objective software evaluation tool (BCCT.core). We presented standardized photographs of 50 patients, taken shortly and one year after surgery to a panel of five breast surgeons, six breast nurses, seven members of a breast cancer support group, five medical and seven non-medical students. In two turns they rated aesthetic outcome on a four point scale. Moreover the same photographs were evaluated by the BCCT.core software. Intra-rater agreement in the panel members was moderate to substantial (k = 0.4-0.5; wk = 0.6-0.7; according to different subgroups and times of assessment). In contrast inter-rater agreement was only slight to fair (mk = 0.1-0.3). Agreement between the panel participants and the software was fair (wk = 0.24-0.45). Subjective third party assessment only fairly agree with objective BCCT.core evaluation just as third party participants do not agree well among each other.",
keywords = "Breast Neoplasms, Esthetics, Female, Humans, Mastectomy, Segmental, Middle Aged, Observer Variation, Photography, Prospective Studies, Software, Treatment Outcome, Journal Article",
author = "Joerg Heil and Anne Carolus and Julia Dahlkamp and Michael Golatta and Christoph Domschke and Florian Schuetz and Maria Blumenstein and Geraldine Rauch and Christof Sohn",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",
year = "2012",
month = feb,
doi = "10.1016/j.breast.2011.07.013",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "61--65",
journal = "BREAST",
issn = "0960-9776",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Objective assessment of aesthetic outcome after breast conserving therapy: subjective third party panel rating and objective BCCT.core software evaluation

AU - Heil, Joerg

AU - Carolus, Anne

AU - Dahlkamp, Julia

AU - Golatta, Michael

AU - Domschke, Christoph

AU - Schuetz, Florian

AU - Blumenstein, Maria

AU - Rauch, Geraldine

AU - Sohn, Christof

N1 - Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

PY - 2012/2

Y1 - 2012/2

N2 - We analysed intra- and inter-rater agreement of subjective third party assessment and agreement with a semi-automated objective software evaluation tool (BCCT.core). We presented standardized photographs of 50 patients, taken shortly and one year after surgery to a panel of five breast surgeons, six breast nurses, seven members of a breast cancer support group, five medical and seven non-medical students. In two turns they rated aesthetic outcome on a four point scale. Moreover the same photographs were evaluated by the BCCT.core software. Intra-rater agreement in the panel members was moderate to substantial (k = 0.4-0.5; wk = 0.6-0.7; according to different subgroups and times of assessment). In contrast inter-rater agreement was only slight to fair (mk = 0.1-0.3). Agreement between the panel participants and the software was fair (wk = 0.24-0.45). Subjective third party assessment only fairly agree with objective BCCT.core evaluation just as third party participants do not agree well among each other.

AB - We analysed intra- and inter-rater agreement of subjective third party assessment and agreement with a semi-automated objective software evaluation tool (BCCT.core). We presented standardized photographs of 50 patients, taken shortly and one year after surgery to a panel of five breast surgeons, six breast nurses, seven members of a breast cancer support group, five medical and seven non-medical students. In two turns they rated aesthetic outcome on a four point scale. Moreover the same photographs were evaluated by the BCCT.core software. Intra-rater agreement in the panel members was moderate to substantial (k = 0.4-0.5; wk = 0.6-0.7; according to different subgroups and times of assessment). In contrast inter-rater agreement was only slight to fair (mk = 0.1-0.3). Agreement between the panel participants and the software was fair (wk = 0.24-0.45). Subjective third party assessment only fairly agree with objective BCCT.core evaluation just as third party participants do not agree well among each other.

KW - Breast Neoplasms

KW - Esthetics

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Mastectomy, Segmental

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Observer Variation

KW - Photography

KW - Prospective Studies

KW - Software

KW - Treatment Outcome

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1016/j.breast.2011.07.013

DO - 10.1016/j.breast.2011.07.013

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 21852135

VL - 21

SP - 61

EP - 65

JO - BREAST

JF - BREAST

SN - 0960-9776

IS - 1

ER -