Noninvasive Cardiac Output Monitoring in Cardiothoracic Surgery Patients: Available Methods and Future Directions

Standard

Noninvasive Cardiac Output Monitoring in Cardiothoracic Surgery Patients: Available Methods and Future Directions. / Saugel, Bernd; Cecconi, Maurizio; Hajjar, Ludhmila Abrahao.

In: J CARDIOTHOR VASC AN, Vol. 33, No. 6, 06.2019, p. 1742-1752.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Review articleResearch

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{871fe989100547d3b5d3053dca39a861,
title = "Noninvasive Cardiac Output Monitoring in Cardiothoracic Surgery Patients: Available Methods and Future Directions",
abstract = "The monitoring and optimization of cardiac output (CO) are central components of perioperative hemodynamic management in patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery. Until recently, echocardiography and invasive indicator dilution methods have been the mainstays of CO monitoring in these patients. However, completely noninvasive methods to estimate CO have become available during recent years. In this review, the physical measurement principles, limitations, and measurement performance of the different techniques for continuous noninvasive CO estimation in the setting of cardiothoracic surgery are described. Methods to estimate CO in a completely noninvasive manner include noninvasive pulse wave analysis (using a finger cuff method or automated radial artery applanation tonometry), thoracic electrical bioimpedance and bioreactance, pulse wave transit time, and partial carbon dioxide rebreathing. All these technologies have been evaluated in cardiothoracic surgery patients, but the validation studies describing the measurement performance in comparison with invasive reference methods have shown inconsistent and, in part, contradictory results. In addition, all technologies have major limitations with regard to the applicability during routine clinical care in the operating room or the intensive care unit. Therefore, the methods for noninvasive CO estimation described in this review still require technological improvements with regard to measurement performance and clinical applicability before they can be recommended for routine perioperative hemodynamic management of cardiothoracic surgery patients outside of studies.",
keywords = "Journal Article, Review",
author = "Bernd Saugel and Maurizio Cecconi and Hajjar, {Ludhmila Abrahao}",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",
year = "2019",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1053/j.jvca.2018.06.012",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "1742--1752",
journal = "J CARDIOTHOR VASC AN",
issn = "1053-0770",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Noninvasive Cardiac Output Monitoring in Cardiothoracic Surgery Patients: Available Methods and Future Directions

AU - Saugel, Bernd

AU - Cecconi, Maurizio

AU - Hajjar, Ludhmila Abrahao

N1 - Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PY - 2019/6

Y1 - 2019/6

N2 - The monitoring and optimization of cardiac output (CO) are central components of perioperative hemodynamic management in patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery. Until recently, echocardiography and invasive indicator dilution methods have been the mainstays of CO monitoring in these patients. However, completely noninvasive methods to estimate CO have become available during recent years. In this review, the physical measurement principles, limitations, and measurement performance of the different techniques for continuous noninvasive CO estimation in the setting of cardiothoracic surgery are described. Methods to estimate CO in a completely noninvasive manner include noninvasive pulse wave analysis (using a finger cuff method or automated radial artery applanation tonometry), thoracic electrical bioimpedance and bioreactance, pulse wave transit time, and partial carbon dioxide rebreathing. All these technologies have been evaluated in cardiothoracic surgery patients, but the validation studies describing the measurement performance in comparison with invasive reference methods have shown inconsistent and, in part, contradictory results. In addition, all technologies have major limitations with regard to the applicability during routine clinical care in the operating room or the intensive care unit. Therefore, the methods for noninvasive CO estimation described in this review still require technological improvements with regard to measurement performance and clinical applicability before they can be recommended for routine perioperative hemodynamic management of cardiothoracic surgery patients outside of studies.

AB - The monitoring and optimization of cardiac output (CO) are central components of perioperative hemodynamic management in patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery. Until recently, echocardiography and invasive indicator dilution methods have been the mainstays of CO monitoring in these patients. However, completely noninvasive methods to estimate CO have become available during recent years. In this review, the physical measurement principles, limitations, and measurement performance of the different techniques for continuous noninvasive CO estimation in the setting of cardiothoracic surgery are described. Methods to estimate CO in a completely noninvasive manner include noninvasive pulse wave analysis (using a finger cuff method or automated radial artery applanation tonometry), thoracic electrical bioimpedance and bioreactance, pulse wave transit time, and partial carbon dioxide rebreathing. All these technologies have been evaluated in cardiothoracic surgery patients, but the validation studies describing the measurement performance in comparison with invasive reference methods have shown inconsistent and, in part, contradictory results. In addition, all technologies have major limitations with regard to the applicability during routine clinical care in the operating room or the intensive care unit. Therefore, the methods for noninvasive CO estimation described in this review still require technological improvements with regard to measurement performance and clinical applicability before they can be recommended for routine perioperative hemodynamic management of cardiothoracic surgery patients outside of studies.

KW - Journal Article

KW - Review

U2 - 10.1053/j.jvca.2018.06.012

DO - 10.1053/j.jvca.2018.06.012

M3 - SCORING: Review article

C2 - 30318422

VL - 33

SP - 1742

EP - 1752

JO - J CARDIOTHOR VASC AN

JF - J CARDIOTHOR VASC AN

SN - 1053-0770

IS - 6

ER -