No Association Between Vitamin D Status and Risk of Barrett's Esophagus or Esophageal Adenocarcinoma-a Mendelian Randomization Study
Standard
No Association Between Vitamin D Status and Risk of Barrett's Esophagus or Esophageal Adenocarcinoma-a Mendelian Randomization Study. / Dong, Jing; Gharahkhani, Puya; Chow, Wong-Ho; Gammon, Marilie D; Liu, Geoffrey; Caldas, Carlos; Wu, Anna H; Ye, Weimin; Onstad, Lynn; Anderson, Lesley A; Bernstein, Leslie; Pharoah, Paul D; Risch, Harvey A; Corley, Douglas A; Fitzgerald, Rebecca C; Iyer, Prasad G; Reid, Brian J; Lagergren, Jesper; Shaheen, Nicholas J; Vaughan, Thomas L; MacGregor, Stuart; Love, Sharon; Palles, Claire; Tomlinson, Ian; Gockel, Ines; May, Andrea; Gerges, Christian; Anders, Mario; Böhmer, Anne C; Becker, Jessica; Kreuser, Nicole; Thieme, Rene; Noder, Tania; Venerito, Marino; Veits, Lothar; Schmidt, Thomas; Schmidt, Claudia; Izbicki, Jakob R; Hölscher, Arnulf H; Lang, Hauke; Lorenz, Dietmar; Schumacher, Brigitte; Mayershofer, Rupert; Vashist, Yogesh; Ott, Katja; Vieth, Michael; Weismüller, Josef; Nöthen, Markus M; Moebus, Susanne; Knapp, Michael; Peters, Wilbert H M; Neuhaus, Horst; Rösch, Thomas; Ell, Christian; Jankowski, Janusz; Schumacher, Johannes; Neale, Rachel E; Whiteman, David C; Thrift, Aaron P; Stomach and Oesophageal Cancer Study (SOCS) consortium.
In: CLIN GASTROENTEROL H, Vol. 17, No. 11, 10.2019, p. 2227-2235.e1.Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journal › SCORING: Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - No Association Between Vitamin D Status and Risk of Barrett's Esophagus or Esophageal Adenocarcinoma-a Mendelian Randomization Study
AU - Dong, Jing
AU - Gharahkhani, Puya
AU - Chow, Wong-Ho
AU - Gammon, Marilie D
AU - Liu, Geoffrey
AU - Caldas, Carlos
AU - Wu, Anna H
AU - Ye, Weimin
AU - Onstad, Lynn
AU - Anderson, Lesley A
AU - Bernstein, Leslie
AU - Pharoah, Paul D
AU - Risch, Harvey A
AU - Corley, Douglas A
AU - Fitzgerald, Rebecca C
AU - Iyer, Prasad G
AU - Reid, Brian J
AU - Lagergren, Jesper
AU - Shaheen, Nicholas J
AU - Vaughan, Thomas L
AU - MacGregor, Stuart
AU - Love, Sharon
AU - Palles, Claire
AU - Tomlinson, Ian
AU - Gockel, Ines
AU - May, Andrea
AU - Gerges, Christian
AU - Anders, Mario
AU - Böhmer, Anne C
AU - Becker, Jessica
AU - Kreuser, Nicole
AU - Thieme, Rene
AU - Noder, Tania
AU - Venerito, Marino
AU - Veits, Lothar
AU - Schmidt, Thomas
AU - Schmidt, Claudia
AU - Izbicki, Jakob R
AU - Hölscher, Arnulf H
AU - Lang, Hauke
AU - Lorenz, Dietmar
AU - Schumacher, Brigitte
AU - Mayershofer, Rupert
AU - Vashist, Yogesh
AU - Ott, Katja
AU - Vieth, Michael
AU - Weismüller, Josef
AU - Nöthen, Markus M
AU - Moebus, Susanne
AU - Knapp, Michael
AU - Peters, Wilbert H M
AU - Neuhaus, Horst
AU - Rösch, Thomas
AU - Ell, Christian
AU - Jankowski, Janusz
AU - Schumacher, Johannes
AU - Neale, Rachel E
AU - Whiteman, David C
AU - Thrift, Aaron P
AU - Stomach and Oesophageal Cancer Study (SOCS) consortium
N1 - Copyright © 2019 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/10
Y1 - 2019/10
N2 - BACKGROUND & AIMS: Epidemiology studies of circulating concentrations of 25 hydroxy vitamin D (25(OH)D) and risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) have produced conflicting results. We conducted a Mendelian randomization study to determine the associations between circulating concentrations of 25(OH)D and risks of EAC and its precursor, Barrett's esophagus (BE).METHODS: We conducted a Mendelian randomization study using a 2-sample (summary data) approach. Six single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs; rs3755967, rs10741657, rs12785878, rs10745742, rs8018720, and rs17216707) associated with circulating concentrations of 25(OH)D were used as instrumental variables. We collected data from 6167 patients with BE, 4112 patients with EAC, and 17,159 individuals without BE or EAC (controls) participating in the Barrett's and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Consortium, as well as studies from Bonn, Germany, and Cambridge and Oxford, United Kingdom. Analyses were performed separately for BE and EAC.RESULTS: Overall, we found no evidence for an association between genetically estimated 25(OH)D concentration and risk of BE or EAC. The odds ratio per 20 nmol/L increase in genetically estimated 25(OH)D concentration for BE risk estimated by combining the individual SNP association using inverse variance weighting was 1.21 (95% CI, 0.77-1.92; P = .41). The odds ratio for EAC risk, estimated by combining the individual SNP association using inverse variance weighting, was 0.68 (95% CI, 0.39-1.19; P = .18).CONCLUSIONS: In a Mendelian randomization study, we found that low genetically estimated 25(OH)D concentrations were not associated with risk of BE or EAC.
AB - BACKGROUND & AIMS: Epidemiology studies of circulating concentrations of 25 hydroxy vitamin D (25(OH)D) and risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) have produced conflicting results. We conducted a Mendelian randomization study to determine the associations between circulating concentrations of 25(OH)D and risks of EAC and its precursor, Barrett's esophagus (BE).METHODS: We conducted a Mendelian randomization study using a 2-sample (summary data) approach. Six single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs; rs3755967, rs10741657, rs12785878, rs10745742, rs8018720, and rs17216707) associated with circulating concentrations of 25(OH)D were used as instrumental variables. We collected data from 6167 patients with BE, 4112 patients with EAC, and 17,159 individuals without BE or EAC (controls) participating in the Barrett's and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Consortium, as well as studies from Bonn, Germany, and Cambridge and Oxford, United Kingdom. Analyses were performed separately for BE and EAC.RESULTS: Overall, we found no evidence for an association between genetically estimated 25(OH)D concentration and risk of BE or EAC. The odds ratio per 20 nmol/L increase in genetically estimated 25(OH)D concentration for BE risk estimated by combining the individual SNP association using inverse variance weighting was 1.21 (95% CI, 0.77-1.92; P = .41). The odds ratio for EAC risk, estimated by combining the individual SNP association using inverse variance weighting, was 0.68 (95% CI, 0.39-1.19; P = .18).CONCLUSIONS: In a Mendelian randomization study, we found that low genetically estimated 25(OH)D concentrations were not associated with risk of BE or EAC.
KW - Journal Article
U2 - 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.01.041
DO - 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.01.041
M3 - SCORING: Journal article
C2 - 30716477
VL - 17
SP - 2227-2235.e1
JO - CLIN GASTROENTEROL H
JF - CLIN GASTROENTEROL H
SN - 1542-3565
IS - 11
ER -