Negative priming (cognitive inhibition) in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD).
Standard
Negative priming (cognitive inhibition) in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). / Moritz, Steffen; Kloss, Martin; Jelinek, Lena.
In: J BEHAV THER EXP PSY, Vol. 41, No. 1, 1, 2010, p. 1-5.Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journal › SCORING: Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Negative priming (cognitive inhibition) in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD).
AU - Moritz, Steffen
AU - Kloss, Martin
AU - Jelinek, Lena
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - Cognitive disinhibition has been implicated in the pathogenesis of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Negative priming (NP) is regarded to tap into this function. While early studies indeed found reduced negative priming in OCD, attempts to replicate are both scarce and equivocal. Moreover, several studies in favor of the disinhibition hypothesis are plagued by methodological limitations. For the present investigation, 18 participants with OCD and 28 healthy controls underwent a computerized NP experiment with varying response-stimulus intervals. In addition, a variant of the paradigm with concurrent item presentation was employed to rule out the confounding impact of memory. Negative priming was comparable between groups yielding small between-group effect sizes. The present study challenges broad claims of disinhibition in OCD. In our view, the disinhibition account faces theoretical problems. Instead, theories implicating cognitive biases as well as metacognitive problems may more parsimoniously explain the idiosyncratic nature of OCD symptoms.
AB - Cognitive disinhibition has been implicated in the pathogenesis of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Negative priming (NP) is regarded to tap into this function. While early studies indeed found reduced negative priming in OCD, attempts to replicate are both scarce and equivocal. Moreover, several studies in favor of the disinhibition hypothesis are plagued by methodological limitations. For the present investigation, 18 participants with OCD and 28 healthy controls underwent a computerized NP experiment with varying response-stimulus intervals. In addition, a variant of the paradigm with concurrent item presentation was employed to rule out the confounding impact of memory. Negative priming was comparable between groups yielding small between-group effect sizes. The present study challenges broad claims of disinhibition in OCD. In our view, the disinhibition account faces theoretical problems. Instead, theories implicating cognitive biases as well as metacognitive problems may more parsimoniously explain the idiosyncratic nature of OCD symptoms.
M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz
VL - 41
SP - 1
EP - 5
JO - J BEHAV THER EXP PSY
JF - J BEHAV THER EXP PSY
SN - 0005-7916
IS - 1
M1 - 1
ER -
