Navigating Post-Operative Outcomes: A Comprehensive Reframing of an Original Graded Prognostic Assessment in Patients with Brain Metastases

Standard

Navigating Post-Operative Outcomes: A Comprehensive Reframing of an Original Graded Prognostic Assessment in Patients with Brain Metastases. / Goldberg, Maria; Mondragon-Soto, Michel G; Dieringer, Laura; Altawalbeh, Ghaith; Pöser, Paul; Baumgart, Lea; Wiestler, Benedikt; Gempt, Jens; Meyer, Bernhard; Aftahy, Amir Kaywan.

In: CANCERS, Vol. 16, No. 2, 291, 10.01.2024.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Goldberg, M, Mondragon-Soto, MG, Dieringer, L, Altawalbeh, G, Pöser, P, Baumgart, L, Wiestler, B, Gempt, J, Meyer, B & Aftahy, AK 2024, 'Navigating Post-Operative Outcomes: A Comprehensive Reframing of an Original Graded Prognostic Assessment in Patients with Brain Metastases', CANCERS, vol. 16, no. 2, 291. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16020291

APA

Goldberg, M., Mondragon-Soto, M. G., Dieringer, L., Altawalbeh, G., Pöser, P., Baumgart, L., Wiestler, B., Gempt, J., Meyer, B., & Aftahy, A. K. (2024). Navigating Post-Operative Outcomes: A Comprehensive Reframing of an Original Graded Prognostic Assessment in Patients with Brain Metastases. CANCERS, 16(2), [291]. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16020291

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{7f9030cd88604d579bbcd20237788ce9,
title = "Navigating Post-Operative Outcomes: A Comprehensive Reframing of an Original Graded Prognostic Assessment in Patients with Brain Metastases",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA) has been proposed for various brain metastases (BMs) tailored to the primary histology and molecular profiles. However, it does not consider whether patients have been operated on or not and does not include surgical outcomes as prognostic factors. The residual tumor burden (RTB) is a strong predictor of overall survival. We validated the GPA score and introduced {"}volumetric GPA{"} in the largest cohort of operated patients and further explored the role of RTB as an additional prognostic factor.METHODS: A total of 630 patients with BMs between 2007 and 2020 were included. The four GPA components were analyzed. The validity of the original score was assessed using Cox regression, and a modified index incorporating RTB was developed by comparing the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, and AUC parameters.RESULTS: GPA categories showed an association with survival: age (p < 0.001, hazard ratio (HR) 2.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.5-3.3), Karnofsky performance status (KPS) (p < 0.001, HR 1.3, 95% CI 1.2-1.5), number of BMs (p = 0.019, HR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.8), and the presence of extracranial manifestation (p < 0.001, HR 3, 95% CI 1.6-2.5). The median survival for GPA 0-1 was 4 months; for GPA 1.5-2, it was 12 months; for GPA 2.5-3, it was 21 months; and for GPA 3.5-4, it was 38 months (p < 0.001). RTB was identified as an independent prognostic factor. A cut-off of 2 cm3 was used for further analysis, which showed a median survival of 6 months (95% CI 4-8) vs. 13 months (95% CI 11-14, p < 0.001) for patients with RTB > 2 cm3 and <2 cm3, respectively. RTB was added as an additional component for a modified volumetric GPA score. The survival rates with the modified GPA score were: GPA 0-1: 4 months, GPA 1.5-2: 7 months, GPA 2.5-3: 18 months, and GPA 3.5-4: 34 months. Both scores showed good stratification, with the new score showed a trend towards better discrimination in patients with more favorable prognoses.CONCLUSION: The prognostic value of the original GPA was confirmed in our cohort of patients who underwent surgery for BM. The RTB was identified as a parameter of high prognostic significance and was incorporated into an updated {"}volumetric GPA{"}. This score provides a novel tool for prognosis and clinical decision making in patients undergoing surgery. This method may be useful for stratification and patient selection for further treatment and in future clinical trials.",
author = "Maria Goldberg and Mondragon-Soto, {Michel G} and Laura Dieringer and Ghaith Altawalbeh and Paul P{\"o}ser and Lea Baumgart and Benedikt Wiestler and Jens Gempt and Bernhard Meyer and Aftahy, {Amir Kaywan}",
year = "2024",
month = jan,
day = "10",
doi = "10.3390/cancers16020291",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
journal = "CANCERS",
issn = "2072-6694",
publisher = "Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Navigating Post-Operative Outcomes: A Comprehensive Reframing of an Original Graded Prognostic Assessment in Patients with Brain Metastases

AU - Goldberg, Maria

AU - Mondragon-Soto, Michel G

AU - Dieringer, Laura

AU - Altawalbeh, Ghaith

AU - Pöser, Paul

AU - Baumgart, Lea

AU - Wiestler, Benedikt

AU - Gempt, Jens

AU - Meyer, Bernhard

AU - Aftahy, Amir Kaywan

PY - 2024/1/10

Y1 - 2024/1/10

N2 - BACKGROUND: Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA) has been proposed for various brain metastases (BMs) tailored to the primary histology and molecular profiles. However, it does not consider whether patients have been operated on or not and does not include surgical outcomes as prognostic factors. The residual tumor burden (RTB) is a strong predictor of overall survival. We validated the GPA score and introduced "volumetric GPA" in the largest cohort of operated patients and further explored the role of RTB as an additional prognostic factor.METHODS: A total of 630 patients with BMs between 2007 and 2020 were included. The four GPA components were analyzed. The validity of the original score was assessed using Cox regression, and a modified index incorporating RTB was developed by comparing the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, and AUC parameters.RESULTS: GPA categories showed an association with survival: age (p < 0.001, hazard ratio (HR) 2.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.5-3.3), Karnofsky performance status (KPS) (p < 0.001, HR 1.3, 95% CI 1.2-1.5), number of BMs (p = 0.019, HR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.8), and the presence of extracranial manifestation (p < 0.001, HR 3, 95% CI 1.6-2.5). The median survival for GPA 0-1 was 4 months; for GPA 1.5-2, it was 12 months; for GPA 2.5-3, it was 21 months; and for GPA 3.5-4, it was 38 months (p < 0.001). RTB was identified as an independent prognostic factor. A cut-off of 2 cm3 was used for further analysis, which showed a median survival of 6 months (95% CI 4-8) vs. 13 months (95% CI 11-14, p < 0.001) for patients with RTB > 2 cm3 and <2 cm3, respectively. RTB was added as an additional component for a modified volumetric GPA score. The survival rates with the modified GPA score were: GPA 0-1: 4 months, GPA 1.5-2: 7 months, GPA 2.5-3: 18 months, and GPA 3.5-4: 34 months. Both scores showed good stratification, with the new score showed a trend towards better discrimination in patients with more favorable prognoses.CONCLUSION: The prognostic value of the original GPA was confirmed in our cohort of patients who underwent surgery for BM. The RTB was identified as a parameter of high prognostic significance and was incorporated into an updated "volumetric GPA". This score provides a novel tool for prognosis and clinical decision making in patients undergoing surgery. This method may be useful for stratification and patient selection for further treatment and in future clinical trials.

AB - BACKGROUND: Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA) has been proposed for various brain metastases (BMs) tailored to the primary histology and molecular profiles. However, it does not consider whether patients have been operated on or not and does not include surgical outcomes as prognostic factors. The residual tumor burden (RTB) is a strong predictor of overall survival. We validated the GPA score and introduced "volumetric GPA" in the largest cohort of operated patients and further explored the role of RTB as an additional prognostic factor.METHODS: A total of 630 patients with BMs between 2007 and 2020 were included. The four GPA components were analyzed. The validity of the original score was assessed using Cox regression, and a modified index incorporating RTB was developed by comparing the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, and AUC parameters.RESULTS: GPA categories showed an association with survival: age (p < 0.001, hazard ratio (HR) 2.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.5-3.3), Karnofsky performance status (KPS) (p < 0.001, HR 1.3, 95% CI 1.2-1.5), number of BMs (p = 0.019, HR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.8), and the presence of extracranial manifestation (p < 0.001, HR 3, 95% CI 1.6-2.5). The median survival for GPA 0-1 was 4 months; for GPA 1.5-2, it was 12 months; for GPA 2.5-3, it was 21 months; and for GPA 3.5-4, it was 38 months (p < 0.001). RTB was identified as an independent prognostic factor. A cut-off of 2 cm3 was used for further analysis, which showed a median survival of 6 months (95% CI 4-8) vs. 13 months (95% CI 11-14, p < 0.001) for patients with RTB > 2 cm3 and <2 cm3, respectively. RTB was added as an additional component for a modified volumetric GPA score. The survival rates with the modified GPA score were: GPA 0-1: 4 months, GPA 1.5-2: 7 months, GPA 2.5-3: 18 months, and GPA 3.5-4: 34 months. Both scores showed good stratification, with the new score showed a trend towards better discrimination in patients with more favorable prognoses.CONCLUSION: The prognostic value of the original GPA was confirmed in our cohort of patients who underwent surgery for BM. The RTB was identified as a parameter of high prognostic significance and was incorporated into an updated "volumetric GPA". This score provides a novel tool for prognosis and clinical decision making in patients undergoing surgery. This method may be useful for stratification and patient selection for further treatment and in future clinical trials.

U2 - 10.3390/cancers16020291

DO - 10.3390/cancers16020291

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 38254781

VL - 16

JO - CANCERS

JF - CANCERS

SN - 2072-6694

IS - 2

M1 - 291

ER -