National trends and disparities in the use of minimally invasive adult pyeloplasty.
Related Research units
Abstract
Minimally invasive pyeloplasty might have several advantages compared to open pyeloplasty in the management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Nonetheless, minimally invasive pyeloplasty appears to be underused in North America. We examined specific patient and hospital characteristics that may be associated with these disparities.
Bibliographical data
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 3 |
| ISSN | 0022-5347 |
| Publication status | Published - 2012 |
| pubmed | 22819404 |
|---|
