Multiple marker approach to risk stratification in patients with stable coronary artery disease

Standard

Multiple marker approach to risk stratification in patients with stable coronary artery disease. / Schnabel, Renate B; Schulz, Andreas; Messow, C Martina; Lubos, Edith; Wild, Philipp S; Zeller, Tanja; Sinning, Christoph R; Rupprecht, Hans J; Bickel, Christoph; Peetz, Dirk; Cambien, François; Kempf, Tibor; Wollert, Kai C; Benjamin, Emelia J; Lackner, Karl J; Münzel, Thomas F; Tiret, Laurence; Vasan, Ramachandran S; Blankenberg, Stefan.

In: EUR HEART J, Vol. 31, No. 24, 12.2010, p. 3024-3031.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Schnabel, RB, Schulz, A, Messow, CM, Lubos, E, Wild, PS, Zeller, T, Sinning, CR, Rupprecht, HJ, Bickel, C, Peetz, D, Cambien, F, Kempf, T, Wollert, KC, Benjamin, EJ, Lackner, KJ, Münzel, TF, Tiret, L, Vasan, RS & Blankenberg, S 2010, 'Multiple marker approach to risk stratification in patients with stable coronary artery disease', EUR HEART J, vol. 31, no. 24, pp. 3024-3031. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehq322

APA

Schnabel, R. B., Schulz, A., Messow, C. M., Lubos, E., Wild, P. S., Zeller, T., Sinning, C. R., Rupprecht, H. J., Bickel, C., Peetz, D., Cambien, F., Kempf, T., Wollert, K. C., Benjamin, E. J., Lackner, K. J., Münzel, T. F., Tiret, L., Vasan, R. S., & Blankenberg, S. (2010). Multiple marker approach to risk stratification in patients with stable coronary artery disease. EUR HEART J, 31(24), 3024-3031. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehq322

Vancouver

Schnabel RB, Schulz A, Messow CM, Lubos E, Wild PS, Zeller T et al. Multiple marker approach to risk stratification in patients with stable coronary artery disease. EUR HEART J. 2010 Dec;31(24):3024-3031. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehq322

Bibtex

@article{ee401a07d31f43d4b340bb00a10f9651,
title = "Multiple marker approach to risk stratification in patients with stable coronary artery disease",
abstract = "AIMS: multimarker approaches for risk prediction in coronary artery disease have remained inconsistent. We assessed multiple biomarkers representing distinct pathophysiological pathways in relation to cardiovascular events in stable angina.METHODS AND RESULTS: we investigated 12 biomarkers reflecting inflammation [C-reactive protein, growth-differentiation factor (GDF)-15, neopterin], lipid metabolism (apolipoproteins AI, B100), renal function (cystatin C, serum creatinine), and cardiovascular function and remodelling [copeptin, C-terminal-pro-endothelin-1, mid-regional-pro-adrenomedullin (MR-proADM), mid-regional-pro-atrial natriuretic peptide (MR-proANP), N-terminal-pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (Nt-proBNP)] in 1781 stable angina patients in relation to non-fatal myocardial infarction and cardiovascular death (n = 137) over 3.6 years. Using Cox proportional hazards models and C-indices, the strongest association with outcome for log-transformed biomarkers in multivariable-adjusted analyses was observed for Nt-proBNP [hazard ratio (HR) for one standard deviation increase 1.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.28-2.13, C-index 0.686], GDF-15 (HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.25-2.02, C-index 0.681), MR-proANP (HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.14-1.87, C-index 0.673), cystatin C (HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.10-1.75, C-index 0.671), and MR-proADM (HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.21-2.20, C-index 0.668). Each of these top single markers and their combination (C-index 0.690) added predictive information beyond the baseline model consisting of the classical risk factors assessed by C-index and led to substantial reclassification (P-integrated discrimination improvement <0.05).CONCLUSION: comparative analysis of 12 biomarkers revealed Nt-proBNP, GDF-15, MR-proANP, cystatin C, and MR-proADM as the strongest predictors of cardiovascular outcome in stable angina. All five biomarkers taken separately offered incremental predictive ability over established risk factors. Combination of the single markers slightly improved model fit but did not enhance risk prediction from a clinical perspective.",
keywords = "Aged, Angina, Stable/blood, Biomarkers/metabolism, Coronary Artery Disease/blood, Female, Humans, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction/blood, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Risk Assessment",
author = "Schnabel, {Renate B} and Andreas Schulz and Messow, {C Martina} and Edith Lubos and Wild, {Philipp S} and Tanja Zeller and Sinning, {Christoph R} and Rupprecht, {Hans J} and Christoph Bickel and Dirk Peetz and Fran{\c c}ois Cambien and Tibor Kempf and Wollert, {Kai C} and Benjamin, {Emelia J} and Lackner, {Karl J} and M{\"u}nzel, {Thomas F} and Laurence Tiret and Vasan, {Ramachandran S} and Stefan Blankenberg",
year = "2010",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1093/eurheartj/ehq322",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "3024--3031",
journal = "EUR HEART J",
issn = "0195-668X",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "24",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multiple marker approach to risk stratification in patients with stable coronary artery disease

AU - Schnabel, Renate B

AU - Schulz, Andreas

AU - Messow, C Martina

AU - Lubos, Edith

AU - Wild, Philipp S

AU - Zeller, Tanja

AU - Sinning, Christoph R

AU - Rupprecht, Hans J

AU - Bickel, Christoph

AU - Peetz, Dirk

AU - Cambien, François

AU - Kempf, Tibor

AU - Wollert, Kai C

AU - Benjamin, Emelia J

AU - Lackner, Karl J

AU - Münzel, Thomas F

AU - Tiret, Laurence

AU - Vasan, Ramachandran S

AU - Blankenberg, Stefan

PY - 2010/12

Y1 - 2010/12

N2 - AIMS: multimarker approaches for risk prediction in coronary artery disease have remained inconsistent. We assessed multiple biomarkers representing distinct pathophysiological pathways in relation to cardiovascular events in stable angina.METHODS AND RESULTS: we investigated 12 biomarkers reflecting inflammation [C-reactive protein, growth-differentiation factor (GDF)-15, neopterin], lipid metabolism (apolipoproteins AI, B100), renal function (cystatin C, serum creatinine), and cardiovascular function and remodelling [copeptin, C-terminal-pro-endothelin-1, mid-regional-pro-adrenomedullin (MR-proADM), mid-regional-pro-atrial natriuretic peptide (MR-proANP), N-terminal-pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (Nt-proBNP)] in 1781 stable angina patients in relation to non-fatal myocardial infarction and cardiovascular death (n = 137) over 3.6 years. Using Cox proportional hazards models and C-indices, the strongest association with outcome for log-transformed biomarkers in multivariable-adjusted analyses was observed for Nt-proBNP [hazard ratio (HR) for one standard deviation increase 1.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.28-2.13, C-index 0.686], GDF-15 (HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.25-2.02, C-index 0.681), MR-proANP (HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.14-1.87, C-index 0.673), cystatin C (HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.10-1.75, C-index 0.671), and MR-proADM (HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.21-2.20, C-index 0.668). Each of these top single markers and their combination (C-index 0.690) added predictive information beyond the baseline model consisting of the classical risk factors assessed by C-index and led to substantial reclassification (P-integrated discrimination improvement <0.05).CONCLUSION: comparative analysis of 12 biomarkers revealed Nt-proBNP, GDF-15, MR-proANP, cystatin C, and MR-proADM as the strongest predictors of cardiovascular outcome in stable angina. All five biomarkers taken separately offered incremental predictive ability over established risk factors. Combination of the single markers slightly improved model fit but did not enhance risk prediction from a clinical perspective.

AB - AIMS: multimarker approaches for risk prediction in coronary artery disease have remained inconsistent. We assessed multiple biomarkers representing distinct pathophysiological pathways in relation to cardiovascular events in stable angina.METHODS AND RESULTS: we investigated 12 biomarkers reflecting inflammation [C-reactive protein, growth-differentiation factor (GDF)-15, neopterin], lipid metabolism (apolipoproteins AI, B100), renal function (cystatin C, serum creatinine), and cardiovascular function and remodelling [copeptin, C-terminal-pro-endothelin-1, mid-regional-pro-adrenomedullin (MR-proADM), mid-regional-pro-atrial natriuretic peptide (MR-proANP), N-terminal-pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (Nt-proBNP)] in 1781 stable angina patients in relation to non-fatal myocardial infarction and cardiovascular death (n = 137) over 3.6 years. Using Cox proportional hazards models and C-indices, the strongest association with outcome for log-transformed biomarkers in multivariable-adjusted analyses was observed for Nt-proBNP [hazard ratio (HR) for one standard deviation increase 1.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.28-2.13, C-index 0.686], GDF-15 (HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.25-2.02, C-index 0.681), MR-proANP (HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.14-1.87, C-index 0.673), cystatin C (HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.10-1.75, C-index 0.671), and MR-proADM (HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.21-2.20, C-index 0.668). Each of these top single markers and their combination (C-index 0.690) added predictive information beyond the baseline model consisting of the classical risk factors assessed by C-index and led to substantial reclassification (P-integrated discrimination improvement <0.05).CONCLUSION: comparative analysis of 12 biomarkers revealed Nt-proBNP, GDF-15, MR-proANP, cystatin C, and MR-proADM as the strongest predictors of cardiovascular outcome in stable angina. All five biomarkers taken separately offered incremental predictive ability over established risk factors. Combination of the single markers slightly improved model fit but did not enhance risk prediction from a clinical perspective.

KW - Aged

KW - Angina, Stable/blood

KW - Biomarkers/metabolism

KW - Coronary Artery Disease/blood

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Kaplan-Meier Estimate

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Myocardial Infarction/blood

KW - Prognosis

KW - Prospective Studies

KW - Risk Assessment

U2 - 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq322

DO - 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq322

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 20852293

VL - 31

SP - 3024

EP - 3031

JO - EUR HEART J

JF - EUR HEART J

SN - 0195-668X

IS - 24

ER -