Multi-detector computed tomography to analyze in-stent restenoses at different heart rates.

Standard

Multi-detector computed tomography to analyze in-stent restenoses at different heart rates. / Köster, Ralf; van Stevendaal, U; Grass, M; Yamamura, Jin; Kähler, Jan; Adam, Gerhard; Meinertz, Thomas; Begemann, Philipp.

In: ROFO-FORTSCHR RONTG, Vol. 180, No. 9, 9, 2008, p. 821-831.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Köster, R, van Stevendaal, U, Grass, M, Yamamura, J, Kähler, J, Adam, G, Meinertz, T & Begemann, P 2008, 'Multi-detector computed tomography to analyze in-stent restenoses at different heart rates.', ROFO-FORTSCHR RONTG, vol. 180, no. 9, 9, pp. 821-831. <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18690580?dopt=Citation>

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{1de030f1fb9e4006b58d0312bbb2e497,
title = "Multi-detector computed tomography to analyze in-stent restenoses at different heart rates.",
abstract = "PURPOSE: This study was performed to evaluate the visualization of coronary in-stent restenosis by multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A restenosis phantom with different stented stenoses was used. The phantom was placed into a dynamic heart phantom with heart rates from 40 to 120 bpm. MDCT was performed with two scan protocols: a standard and an ultra-high resolution scan protocol. RESULTS: Using the ultra-high resolution protocol, artifacts occurred at 0.6 mm around the stent struts (p <0.001). Artifacts compromised the discrimination between no stenosis and low-grade stenosis. Approximately 73% of the central lumen diameter was able to be assessed without limiting artifacts allowing the discrimination of no or low vs. moderate and high-grade stenoses (p <0.05). Using the standard protocol in the dynamic phantom, the image quality and visibility of stenoses decreased with an increasing heart rate (p <0.0002 and p <0.004). This was able to be compensated by analysis in an appropriate RR-interval. At the optimal RR-interval, an assessment of the grade of stenoses > 30% was feasible up to 120 bpm. CONCLUSION: Multi-detector computed tomography ultra-high resolution scans allowed the assessment of a wide range of degrees of in-stent restenoses. In this experimental setup, standard protocols allowed a discrimination of low, moderate and high-grade stenoses even at heart rates above 100 bpm.",
author = "Ralf K{\"o}ster and {van Stevendaal}, U and M Grass and Jin Yamamura and Jan K{\"a}hler and Gerhard Adam and Thomas Meinertz and Philipp Begemann",
year = "2008",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "180",
pages = "821--831",
journal = "ROFO-FORTSCHR RONTG",
issn = "1438-9029",
publisher = "Georg Thieme Verlag KG",
number = "9",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multi-detector computed tomography to analyze in-stent restenoses at different heart rates.

AU - Köster, Ralf

AU - van Stevendaal, U

AU - Grass, M

AU - Yamamura, Jin

AU - Kähler, Jan

AU - Adam, Gerhard

AU - Meinertz, Thomas

AU - Begemann, Philipp

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - PURPOSE: This study was performed to evaluate the visualization of coronary in-stent restenosis by multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A restenosis phantom with different stented stenoses was used. The phantom was placed into a dynamic heart phantom with heart rates from 40 to 120 bpm. MDCT was performed with two scan protocols: a standard and an ultra-high resolution scan protocol. RESULTS: Using the ultra-high resolution protocol, artifacts occurred at 0.6 mm around the stent struts (p <0.001). Artifacts compromised the discrimination between no stenosis and low-grade stenosis. Approximately 73% of the central lumen diameter was able to be assessed without limiting artifacts allowing the discrimination of no or low vs. moderate and high-grade stenoses (p <0.05). Using the standard protocol in the dynamic phantom, the image quality and visibility of stenoses decreased with an increasing heart rate (p <0.0002 and p <0.004). This was able to be compensated by analysis in an appropriate RR-interval. At the optimal RR-interval, an assessment of the grade of stenoses > 30% was feasible up to 120 bpm. CONCLUSION: Multi-detector computed tomography ultra-high resolution scans allowed the assessment of a wide range of degrees of in-stent restenoses. In this experimental setup, standard protocols allowed a discrimination of low, moderate and high-grade stenoses even at heart rates above 100 bpm.

AB - PURPOSE: This study was performed to evaluate the visualization of coronary in-stent restenosis by multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A restenosis phantom with different stented stenoses was used. The phantom was placed into a dynamic heart phantom with heart rates from 40 to 120 bpm. MDCT was performed with two scan protocols: a standard and an ultra-high resolution scan protocol. RESULTS: Using the ultra-high resolution protocol, artifacts occurred at 0.6 mm around the stent struts (p <0.001). Artifacts compromised the discrimination between no stenosis and low-grade stenosis. Approximately 73% of the central lumen diameter was able to be assessed without limiting artifacts allowing the discrimination of no or low vs. moderate and high-grade stenoses (p <0.05). Using the standard protocol in the dynamic phantom, the image quality and visibility of stenoses decreased with an increasing heart rate (p <0.0002 and p <0.004). This was able to be compensated by analysis in an appropriate RR-interval. At the optimal RR-interval, an assessment of the grade of stenoses > 30% was feasible up to 120 bpm. CONCLUSION: Multi-detector computed tomography ultra-high resolution scans allowed the assessment of a wide range of degrees of in-stent restenoses. In this experimental setup, standard protocols allowed a discrimination of low, moderate and high-grade stenoses even at heart rates above 100 bpm.

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

VL - 180

SP - 821

EP - 831

JO - ROFO-FORTSCHR RONTG

JF - ROFO-FORTSCHR RONTG

SN - 1438-9029

IS - 9

M1 - 9

ER -