Multicenter randomized comparison of xenon and isoflurane on left ventricular function in patients undergoing elective surgery.
Standard
Multicenter randomized comparison of xenon and isoflurane on left ventricular function in patients undergoing elective surgery. / Wappler, Frank; Rossaint, Rolf; Baumert, Jan; Scholz, Jens; Tonner, Peter H; van Aken, Hugo; Berendes, Elmar; Klein, Jan; Gommers, Diederik; Hammerle, Alfons; Franke, Andreas; Hofmann, Thomas; Schulte Am Esch, Jochen.
In: ANESTHESIOLOGY, Vol. 106, No. 3, 3, 2007, p. 463-471.Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journal › SCORING: Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Multicenter randomized comparison of xenon and isoflurane on left ventricular function in patients undergoing elective surgery.
AU - Wappler, Frank
AU - Rossaint, Rolf
AU - Baumert, Jan
AU - Scholz, Jens
AU - Tonner, Peter H
AU - van Aken, Hugo
AU - Berendes, Elmar
AU - Klein, Jan
AU - Gommers, Diederik
AU - Hammerle, Alfons
AU - Franke, Andreas
AU - Hofmann, Thomas
AU - Schulte Am Esch, Jochen
PY - 2007
Y1 - 2007
N2 - BACKGROUND: Volatile anesthetics are commonly used for general anesthesia. However, these can induce profound cardiovascular alterations. Xenon is a noble gas with potent anesthetic and analgesic properties. However, it is uncertain whether xenon alters myocardial function. The aim of this study was therefore to investigate left ventricular function during anesthesia with xenon compared with isoflurane. METHODS: The authors performed a randomized multicenter trial to compare xenon with isoflurane with respect to cardiovascular stability and adverse effects in patients without cardiac diseases scheduled for elective surgery. Two hundred fifty-nine patients were enrolled in this trial, of which 252 completed the study according to the protocol. Patients were anesthetized with xenon or isoflurane, respectively. Before administration of the study drugs and at four time points, the effects of both anesthetics on left ventricular function were investigated using transesophageal echocardiography. RESULTS: Global hemodynamic parameters were significantly altered using isoflurane (P <0.05 vs. baseline), whereas xenon only decreased heart rate (P <0.05 vs. baseline). In contrast to xenon, left ventricular end-systolic wall stress decreased significantly in the isoflurane group (P <0.05 vs. baseline). Velocity of circumferential fiber shortening was decreased significantly in the xenon group but showed a more pronounced reduction during isoflurane administration (P <0.05 vs. baseline). The contractile index (difference between expected and actually measured velocity of circumferential fiber shortening) as an independent parameter for left ventricular function was significantly decreased after isoflurane (P <0.0001) but unchanged using xenon. CONCLUSIONS: Xenon did not reduce contractility, whereas isoflurane decreased the contractile index, indicating that xenon enables favorable cardiovascular stability in patients without cardiac diseases.
AB - BACKGROUND: Volatile anesthetics are commonly used for general anesthesia. However, these can induce profound cardiovascular alterations. Xenon is a noble gas with potent anesthetic and analgesic properties. However, it is uncertain whether xenon alters myocardial function. The aim of this study was therefore to investigate left ventricular function during anesthesia with xenon compared with isoflurane. METHODS: The authors performed a randomized multicenter trial to compare xenon with isoflurane with respect to cardiovascular stability and adverse effects in patients without cardiac diseases scheduled for elective surgery. Two hundred fifty-nine patients were enrolled in this trial, of which 252 completed the study according to the protocol. Patients were anesthetized with xenon or isoflurane, respectively. Before administration of the study drugs and at four time points, the effects of both anesthetics on left ventricular function were investigated using transesophageal echocardiography. RESULTS: Global hemodynamic parameters were significantly altered using isoflurane (P <0.05 vs. baseline), whereas xenon only decreased heart rate (P <0.05 vs. baseline). In contrast to xenon, left ventricular end-systolic wall stress decreased significantly in the isoflurane group (P <0.05 vs. baseline). Velocity of circumferential fiber shortening was decreased significantly in the xenon group but showed a more pronounced reduction during isoflurane administration (P <0.05 vs. baseline). The contractile index (difference between expected and actually measured velocity of circumferential fiber shortening) as an independent parameter for left ventricular function was significantly decreased after isoflurane (P <0.0001) but unchanged using xenon. CONCLUSIONS: Xenon did not reduce contractility, whereas isoflurane decreased the contractile index, indicating that xenon enables favorable cardiovascular stability in patients without cardiac diseases.
M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz
VL - 106
SP - 463
EP - 471
JO - ANESTHESIOLOGY
JF - ANESTHESIOLOGY
SN - 0003-3022
IS - 3
M1 - 3
ER -