Moving the mandible in orthognathic surgery - A multicenter analysis
Standard
Moving the mandible in orthognathic surgery - A multicenter analysis. / Thiele, Oliver C; Kreppel, Matthias; Bittermann, Gido; Bonitz, Lars; Desmedt, Maria; Dittes, Carsten; Dörre, Annegret; Dunsche, Anton; Eckert, Alexander W; Ehrenfeld, Michael; Fleiner, Bernd; Frerich, Bernhard; Gaggl, Alexander; Gerressen, Marcus; Gmelin, Leonore; Hammacher, Andreas; Haßfeld, Stefan; Heiland, Max; Hemprich, Alexander; Hidding, Johannes; Hölzle, Frank; Howaldt, Hans-Peter; Iizuka, Tateyuki; Kater, Wolfgang; Klein, Cornelius; Klein, Martin; Köhnke, Robert H; Kolk, Andreas; Kübler, Alexander C; Kübler, Norbert R; Kunkel, Martin; Kuttenberger, Johannes J; Kreusch, Thomas; Landes, Constantin; Lehner, Bernhard; Mischkowski, Robert A; Mokros, Steffen; Neff, Andreas; Nkenke, Emeka; Palm, Frank; Paulus, Gerhard W; Piesold, Jörn U; Rasse, Michael; Rodemer, Herbert; Rothamel, Daniel; Rustemeyer, Jan; Sader, Robert; Scheer, Martin; Scheffler, Birgit; Schippers, Christian; Schliephake, Henning; Schmelzeisen, Rainer; Schramm, Alexander; Spitzer, Wolfgang J; Stoll, Christian; Terheyden, Hendrik; Weingart, Dieter; Wiltfang, Jörg; Wolff, Klaus D; Ziegler, Christoph M; Zöller, Joachim E.
In: J CRANIO MAXILL SURG, Vol. 44, No. 5, 05.2016, p. 579-83.Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journal › SCORING: Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Moving the mandible in orthognathic surgery - A multicenter analysis
AU - Thiele, Oliver C
AU - Kreppel, Matthias
AU - Bittermann, Gido
AU - Bonitz, Lars
AU - Desmedt, Maria
AU - Dittes, Carsten
AU - Dörre, Annegret
AU - Dunsche, Anton
AU - Eckert, Alexander W
AU - Ehrenfeld, Michael
AU - Fleiner, Bernd
AU - Frerich, Bernhard
AU - Gaggl, Alexander
AU - Gerressen, Marcus
AU - Gmelin, Leonore
AU - Hammacher, Andreas
AU - Haßfeld, Stefan
AU - Heiland, Max
AU - Hemprich, Alexander
AU - Hidding, Johannes
AU - Hölzle, Frank
AU - Howaldt, Hans-Peter
AU - Iizuka, Tateyuki
AU - Kater, Wolfgang
AU - Klein, Cornelius
AU - Klein, Martin
AU - Köhnke, Robert H
AU - Kolk, Andreas
AU - Kübler, Alexander C
AU - Kübler, Norbert R
AU - Kunkel, Martin
AU - Kuttenberger, Johannes J
AU - Kreusch, Thomas
AU - Landes, Constantin
AU - Lehner, Bernhard
AU - Mischkowski, Robert A
AU - Mokros, Steffen
AU - Neff, Andreas
AU - Nkenke, Emeka
AU - Palm, Frank
AU - Paulus, Gerhard W
AU - Piesold, Jörn U
AU - Rasse, Michael
AU - Rodemer, Herbert
AU - Rothamel, Daniel
AU - Rustemeyer, Jan
AU - Sader, Robert
AU - Scheer, Martin
AU - Scheffler, Birgit
AU - Schippers, Christian
AU - Schliephake, Henning
AU - Schmelzeisen, Rainer
AU - Schramm, Alexander
AU - Spitzer, Wolfgang J
AU - Stoll, Christian
AU - Terheyden, Hendrik
AU - Weingart, Dieter
AU - Wiltfang, Jörg
AU - Wolff, Klaus D
AU - Ziegler, Christoph M
AU - Zöller, Joachim E
N1 - Copyright © 2016 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
PY - 2016/5
Y1 - 2016/5
N2 - Orthognathic surgery has always been a classical focus of maxillofacial surgery. Since more than 100 years, various surgical techniques for mandibular repositioning have been developed and clinically tested. Since the establishment of plate and screw osteosynthesis, orthognathic surgery became more stable and safe. Nowadays, different surgical methods for mobilising the mandible are existing. This international multicenter analysis (n = 51 hospitals) is providing first evidence based data for the current use of different surgical methods. The dominating techniques were Obwegeser/dal Pont (61%) followed by Hunsuck/Epker (37%) and Perthes/Schlössmann (29%). The main osteosynthesis materials were plates (82%), bicortical screws (23.5%), or a combination of both (5.9%). 47% of all centers reported to use several surgical methods at the same time, depending on the anatomical problem and the surgeon's preference. This shows that different surgical methods seem to work as comparable, safe, and reliable procedures in everydays clinical practise. On this basis, further prospective studies could evaluate possible advantages for our patients.
AB - Orthognathic surgery has always been a classical focus of maxillofacial surgery. Since more than 100 years, various surgical techniques for mandibular repositioning have been developed and clinically tested. Since the establishment of plate and screw osteosynthesis, orthognathic surgery became more stable and safe. Nowadays, different surgical methods for mobilising the mandible are existing. This international multicenter analysis (n = 51 hospitals) is providing first evidence based data for the current use of different surgical methods. The dominating techniques were Obwegeser/dal Pont (61%) followed by Hunsuck/Epker (37%) and Perthes/Schlössmann (29%). The main osteosynthesis materials were plates (82%), bicortical screws (23.5%), or a combination of both (5.9%). 47% of all centers reported to use several surgical methods at the same time, depending on the anatomical problem and the surgeon's preference. This shows that different surgical methods seem to work as comparable, safe, and reliable procedures in everydays clinical practise. On this basis, further prospective studies could evaluate possible advantages for our patients.
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcms.2016.01.024
DO - 10.1016/j.jcms.2016.01.024
M3 - SCORING: Journal article
C2 - 27017103
VL - 44
SP - 579
EP - 583
JO - J CRANIO MAXILL SURG
JF - J CRANIO MAXILL SURG
SN - 1010-5182
IS - 5
ER -