Monitoring minimal residual disease in children with high-risk relapses of acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Prognostic relevance of early and late assessment

Standard

Monitoring minimal residual disease in children with high-risk relapses of acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Prognostic relevance of early and late assessment. / Eckert, C; Hagedorn, N; Sramkova, L; Mann, G; Panzer-Grümayer, R; Peters, C; Bourquin, J-P; Klingebiel, T; Borkhardt, A; Cario, G; Alten, J; Escherich, Gabriele; Astrahantseff, K; Seeger, K; Henze, G; von Stackelberg, A.

In: LEUKEMIA, Vol. 29, No. 8, 2015, p. 1648-1655.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Eckert, C, Hagedorn, N, Sramkova, L, Mann, G, Panzer-Grümayer, R, Peters, C, Bourquin, J-P, Klingebiel, T, Borkhardt, A, Cario, G, Alten, J, Escherich, G, Astrahantseff, K, Seeger, K, Henze, G & von Stackelberg, A 2015, 'Monitoring minimal residual disease in children with high-risk relapses of acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Prognostic relevance of early and late assessment', LEUKEMIA, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 1648-1655. https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2015.59

APA

Eckert, C., Hagedorn, N., Sramkova, L., Mann, G., Panzer-Grümayer, R., Peters, C., Bourquin, J-P., Klingebiel, T., Borkhardt, A., Cario, G., Alten, J., Escherich, G., Astrahantseff, K., Seeger, K., Henze, G., & von Stackelberg, A. (2015). Monitoring minimal residual disease in children with high-risk relapses of acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Prognostic relevance of early and late assessment. LEUKEMIA, 29(8), 1648-1655. https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2015.59

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{de56f7e68a9548849f0c0cb6e5ff877f,
title = "Monitoring minimal residual disease in children with high-risk relapses of acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Prognostic relevance of early and late assessment",
abstract = "The prognosis for children with high-risk relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is poor. Here, we assessed the prognostic importance of response during induction and consolidation treatment prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) aiming to evaluate the best time to assess minimal residual disease MRD for intervention strategies and in future trials in high-risk ALL relapse patients. Included patients (n=125) were treated uniformly according to the ALL-REZ BFM 2002 relapse trial (median follow-up time=4.8 years). Patients with MRD ⩾10(-3) after induction treatment (76/119, 64%) or immediately preceding HSCT (19/71, 27%) had a significantly worse probability of disease-free survival 10 years after relapse treatment begin, with 26% (±6%) or 23% (±7%), respectively, compared to 58% (±8%) or 48% (±7%) for patients with MRD <10(-3). Conventional intensive consolidation treatment reduced MRD to <10(-)3 before HSCT in 63% of patients, whereas MRD remained high or increased in the rest of this patient group. Our data support that MRD after induction treatment can be used to quantify the activity of different induction treatment strategies in phase II trials. MRD persistence at ⩾10(-3) before HSCT reflects a disease highly resistant to conventional intensive chemotherapy and requiring prospective controlled investigation of new treatment strategies and drugs.Leukemia accepted article preview online, 09 March 2015. doi:10.1038/leu.2015.59.",
author = "C Eckert and N Hagedorn and L Sramkova and G Mann and R Panzer-Gr{\"u}mayer and C Peters and J-P Bourquin and T Klingebiel and A Borkhardt and G Cario and J Alten and Gabriele Escherich and K Astrahantseff and K Seeger and G Henze and {von Stackelberg}, A",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1038/leu.2015.59",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "1648--1655",
journal = "LEUKEMIA",
issn = "0887-6924",
publisher = "NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP",
number = "8",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Monitoring minimal residual disease in children with high-risk relapses of acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Prognostic relevance of early and late assessment

AU - Eckert, C

AU - Hagedorn, N

AU - Sramkova, L

AU - Mann, G

AU - Panzer-Grümayer, R

AU - Peters, C

AU - Bourquin, J-P

AU - Klingebiel, T

AU - Borkhardt, A

AU - Cario, G

AU - Alten, J

AU - Escherich, Gabriele

AU - Astrahantseff, K

AU - Seeger, K

AU - Henze, G

AU - von Stackelberg, A

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - The prognosis for children with high-risk relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is poor. Here, we assessed the prognostic importance of response during induction and consolidation treatment prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) aiming to evaluate the best time to assess minimal residual disease MRD for intervention strategies and in future trials in high-risk ALL relapse patients. Included patients (n=125) were treated uniformly according to the ALL-REZ BFM 2002 relapse trial (median follow-up time=4.8 years). Patients with MRD ⩾10(-3) after induction treatment (76/119, 64%) or immediately preceding HSCT (19/71, 27%) had a significantly worse probability of disease-free survival 10 years after relapse treatment begin, with 26% (±6%) or 23% (±7%), respectively, compared to 58% (±8%) or 48% (±7%) for patients with MRD <10(-3). Conventional intensive consolidation treatment reduced MRD to <10(-)3 before HSCT in 63% of patients, whereas MRD remained high or increased in the rest of this patient group. Our data support that MRD after induction treatment can be used to quantify the activity of different induction treatment strategies in phase II trials. MRD persistence at ⩾10(-3) before HSCT reflects a disease highly resistant to conventional intensive chemotherapy and requiring prospective controlled investigation of new treatment strategies and drugs.Leukemia accepted article preview online, 09 March 2015. doi:10.1038/leu.2015.59.

AB - The prognosis for children with high-risk relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is poor. Here, we assessed the prognostic importance of response during induction and consolidation treatment prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) aiming to evaluate the best time to assess minimal residual disease MRD for intervention strategies and in future trials in high-risk ALL relapse patients. Included patients (n=125) were treated uniformly according to the ALL-REZ BFM 2002 relapse trial (median follow-up time=4.8 years). Patients with MRD ⩾10(-3) after induction treatment (76/119, 64%) or immediately preceding HSCT (19/71, 27%) had a significantly worse probability of disease-free survival 10 years after relapse treatment begin, with 26% (±6%) or 23% (±7%), respectively, compared to 58% (±8%) or 48% (±7%) for patients with MRD <10(-3). Conventional intensive consolidation treatment reduced MRD to <10(-)3 before HSCT in 63% of patients, whereas MRD remained high or increased in the rest of this patient group. Our data support that MRD after induction treatment can be used to quantify the activity of different induction treatment strategies in phase II trials. MRD persistence at ⩾10(-3) before HSCT reflects a disease highly resistant to conventional intensive chemotherapy and requiring prospective controlled investigation of new treatment strategies and drugs.Leukemia accepted article preview online, 09 March 2015. doi:10.1038/leu.2015.59.

U2 - 10.1038/leu.2015.59

DO - 10.1038/leu.2015.59

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 25748682

VL - 29

SP - 1648

EP - 1655

JO - LEUKEMIA

JF - LEUKEMIA

SN - 0887-6924

IS - 8

ER -