Modeling the Prognostic Impact of Circulating Tumor Cells Enumeration in Metastatic Breast Cancer for Clinical Trial Design Simulation

Standard

Modeling the Prognostic Impact of Circulating Tumor Cells Enumeration in Metastatic Breast Cancer for Clinical Trial Design Simulation. / Gerratana, Lorenzo; Pierga, Jean-Yves; Reuben, James M; Davis, Andrew A; Wehbe, Firas H; Dirix, Luc; Fehm, Tanja; Nolé, Franco; Gisbert-Criado, Rafael; Mavroudis, Dimitrios; Grisanti, Salvatore; Garcia-Saenz, Jose A; Stebbing, Justin; Caldas, Carlos; Gazzaniga, Paola; Manso, Luis; Zamarchi, Rita; Bonotto, Marta; Fernandez de Lascoiti, Angela; De Mattos-Arruda, Leticia; Ignatiadis, Michail; Sandri, Maria-Teresa; Generali, Daniele; De Angelis, Carmine; Dawson, Sarah-Jane; Janni, Wolfgang; Carañana, Vicente; Riethdorf, Sabine; Solomayer, Erich-Franz; Puglisi, Fabio; Giuliano, Mario; Pantel, Klaus; Bidard, François-Clément; Cristofanilli, Massimo.

In: ONCOLOGIST, Vol. 27, No. 7, 05.07.2022, p. e561-e570.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Gerratana, L, Pierga, J-Y, Reuben, JM, Davis, AA, Wehbe, FH, Dirix, L, Fehm, T, Nolé, F, Gisbert-Criado, R, Mavroudis, D, Grisanti, S, Garcia-Saenz, JA, Stebbing, J, Caldas, C, Gazzaniga, P, Manso, L, Zamarchi, R, Bonotto, M, Fernandez de Lascoiti, A, De Mattos-Arruda, L, Ignatiadis, M, Sandri, M-T, Generali, D, De Angelis, C, Dawson, S-J, Janni, W, Carañana, V, Riethdorf, S, Solomayer, E-F, Puglisi, F, Giuliano, M, Pantel, K, Bidard, F-C & Cristofanilli, M 2022, 'Modeling the Prognostic Impact of Circulating Tumor Cells Enumeration in Metastatic Breast Cancer for Clinical Trial Design Simulation', ONCOLOGIST, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. e561-e570. https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyac045

APA

Gerratana, L., Pierga, J-Y., Reuben, J. M., Davis, A. A., Wehbe, F. H., Dirix, L., Fehm, T., Nolé, F., Gisbert-Criado, R., Mavroudis, D., Grisanti, S., Garcia-Saenz, J. A., Stebbing, J., Caldas, C., Gazzaniga, P., Manso, L., Zamarchi, R., Bonotto, M., Fernandez de Lascoiti, A., ... Cristofanilli, M. (2022). Modeling the Prognostic Impact of Circulating Tumor Cells Enumeration in Metastatic Breast Cancer for Clinical Trial Design Simulation. ONCOLOGIST, 27(7), e561-e570. https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyac045

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{9444288bdcd4403e8d5815b01e954455,
title = "Modeling the Prognostic Impact of Circulating Tumor Cells Enumeration in Metastatic Breast Cancer for Clinical Trial Design Simulation",
abstract = "Despite the strong prognostic stratification of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) enumeration in metastatic breast cancer (MBC), current clinical trials usually do not include a baseline CTCs in their design. This study aimed to generate a classifier for CTCs prognostic simulation in existing datasets for hypothesis generation in patients with MBC. A K-nearest neighbor machine learning algorithm was trained on a pooled dataset comprising 2436 individual MBC patients from the European Pooled Analysis Consortium and the MD Anderson Cancer Center to identify patients likely to have CTCs ≥ 5/7 mL blood (StageIVaggressive vs StageIVindolent). The model had a 65.1% accuracy and its prognostic impact resulted in a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.89 (Simulatedaggressive vs Simulatedindolent P < .001), similar to patients with actual CTCs enumeration (HR 2.76; P < .001). The classifier's performance was then tested on an independent retrospective database comprising 446 consecutive hormone receptor (HR)-positive HER2-negative MBC patients. The model further stratified clinical subgroups usually considered prognostically homogeneous such as patients with bone-only or liver metastases. Bone-only disease classified as Simulatedaggressive had a significantly worse overall survival (OS; P < .0001), while patients with liver metastases classified as Simulatedindolent had a significantly better prognosis (P < .0001). Consistent results were observed for patients who had undergone CTCs enumeration in the pooled population. The differential prognostic impact of endocrine- (ET) and chemotherapy (CT) was explored across the simulated subgroups. No significant differences were observed between ET and CT in the overall population, both in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) and OS. In contrast, a statistically significant difference, favoring CT over ET was observed among Simulatedaggressive patients (HR: 0.62; P = .030 and HR: 0.60; P = .037, respectively, for PFS and OS).",
author = "Lorenzo Gerratana and Jean-Yves Pierga and Reuben, {James M} and Davis, {Andrew A} and Wehbe, {Firas H} and Luc Dirix and Tanja Fehm and Franco Nol{\'e} and Rafael Gisbert-Criado and Dimitrios Mavroudis and Salvatore Grisanti and Garcia-Saenz, {Jose A} and Justin Stebbing and Carlos Caldas and Paola Gazzaniga and Luis Manso and Rita Zamarchi and Marta Bonotto and {Fernandez de Lascoiti}, Angela and {De Mattos-Arruda}, Leticia and Michail Ignatiadis and Maria-Teresa Sandri and Daniele Generali and {De Angelis}, Carmine and Sarah-Jane Dawson and Wolfgang Janni and Vicente Cara{\~n}ana and Sabine Riethdorf and Erich-Franz Solomayer and Fabio Puglisi and Mario Giuliano and Klaus Pantel and Fran{\c c}ois-Cl{\'e}ment Bidard and Massimo Cristofanilli",
note = "{\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press.",
year = "2022",
month = jul,
day = "5",
doi = "10.1093/oncolo/oyac045",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "e561--e570",
journal = "ONCOLOGIST",
issn = "1083-7159",
publisher = "ALPHAMED PRESS",
number = "7",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Modeling the Prognostic Impact of Circulating Tumor Cells Enumeration in Metastatic Breast Cancer for Clinical Trial Design Simulation

AU - Gerratana, Lorenzo

AU - Pierga, Jean-Yves

AU - Reuben, James M

AU - Davis, Andrew A

AU - Wehbe, Firas H

AU - Dirix, Luc

AU - Fehm, Tanja

AU - Nolé, Franco

AU - Gisbert-Criado, Rafael

AU - Mavroudis, Dimitrios

AU - Grisanti, Salvatore

AU - Garcia-Saenz, Jose A

AU - Stebbing, Justin

AU - Caldas, Carlos

AU - Gazzaniga, Paola

AU - Manso, Luis

AU - Zamarchi, Rita

AU - Bonotto, Marta

AU - Fernandez de Lascoiti, Angela

AU - De Mattos-Arruda, Leticia

AU - Ignatiadis, Michail

AU - Sandri, Maria-Teresa

AU - Generali, Daniele

AU - De Angelis, Carmine

AU - Dawson, Sarah-Jane

AU - Janni, Wolfgang

AU - Carañana, Vicente

AU - Riethdorf, Sabine

AU - Solomayer, Erich-Franz

AU - Puglisi, Fabio

AU - Giuliano, Mario

AU - Pantel, Klaus

AU - Bidard, François-Clément

AU - Cristofanilli, Massimo

N1 - © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press.

PY - 2022/7/5

Y1 - 2022/7/5

N2 - Despite the strong prognostic stratification of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) enumeration in metastatic breast cancer (MBC), current clinical trials usually do not include a baseline CTCs in their design. This study aimed to generate a classifier for CTCs prognostic simulation in existing datasets for hypothesis generation in patients with MBC. A K-nearest neighbor machine learning algorithm was trained on a pooled dataset comprising 2436 individual MBC patients from the European Pooled Analysis Consortium and the MD Anderson Cancer Center to identify patients likely to have CTCs ≥ 5/7 mL blood (StageIVaggressive vs StageIVindolent). The model had a 65.1% accuracy and its prognostic impact resulted in a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.89 (Simulatedaggressive vs Simulatedindolent P < .001), similar to patients with actual CTCs enumeration (HR 2.76; P < .001). The classifier's performance was then tested on an independent retrospective database comprising 446 consecutive hormone receptor (HR)-positive HER2-negative MBC patients. The model further stratified clinical subgroups usually considered prognostically homogeneous such as patients with bone-only or liver metastases. Bone-only disease classified as Simulatedaggressive had a significantly worse overall survival (OS; P < .0001), while patients with liver metastases classified as Simulatedindolent had a significantly better prognosis (P < .0001). Consistent results were observed for patients who had undergone CTCs enumeration in the pooled population. The differential prognostic impact of endocrine- (ET) and chemotherapy (CT) was explored across the simulated subgroups. No significant differences were observed between ET and CT in the overall population, both in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) and OS. In contrast, a statistically significant difference, favoring CT over ET was observed among Simulatedaggressive patients (HR: 0.62; P = .030 and HR: 0.60; P = .037, respectively, for PFS and OS).

AB - Despite the strong prognostic stratification of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) enumeration in metastatic breast cancer (MBC), current clinical trials usually do not include a baseline CTCs in their design. This study aimed to generate a classifier for CTCs prognostic simulation in existing datasets for hypothesis generation in patients with MBC. A K-nearest neighbor machine learning algorithm was trained on a pooled dataset comprising 2436 individual MBC patients from the European Pooled Analysis Consortium and the MD Anderson Cancer Center to identify patients likely to have CTCs ≥ 5/7 mL blood (StageIVaggressive vs StageIVindolent). The model had a 65.1% accuracy and its prognostic impact resulted in a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.89 (Simulatedaggressive vs Simulatedindolent P < .001), similar to patients with actual CTCs enumeration (HR 2.76; P < .001). The classifier's performance was then tested on an independent retrospective database comprising 446 consecutive hormone receptor (HR)-positive HER2-negative MBC patients. The model further stratified clinical subgroups usually considered prognostically homogeneous such as patients with bone-only or liver metastases. Bone-only disease classified as Simulatedaggressive had a significantly worse overall survival (OS; P < .0001), while patients with liver metastases classified as Simulatedindolent had a significantly better prognosis (P < .0001). Consistent results were observed for patients who had undergone CTCs enumeration in the pooled population. The differential prognostic impact of endocrine- (ET) and chemotherapy (CT) was explored across the simulated subgroups. No significant differences were observed between ET and CT in the overall population, both in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) and OS. In contrast, a statistically significant difference, favoring CT over ET was observed among Simulatedaggressive patients (HR: 0.62; P = .030 and HR: 0.60; P = .037, respectively, for PFS and OS).

U2 - 10.1093/oncolo/oyac045

DO - 10.1093/oncolo/oyac045

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 35278078

VL - 27

SP - e561-e570

JO - ONCOLOGIST

JF - ONCOLOGIST

SN - 1083-7159

IS - 7

ER -