Modeling of treatment response to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in older (age≥70years) and younger (age<70years) patients with cancer and anemia: findings from the Anemia Cancer Treatment study

Standard

Modeling of treatment response to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in older (age≥70years) and younger (age<70years) patients with cancer and anemia: findings from the Anemia Cancer Treatment study. / Abraham, Ivo; MacDonald, Karen; Tharmarajah, Soba; Bokemeyer, Carsten; Ludwig, Heinz; Soubeyran, Pierre; Battistel, Vittorio; Aapro, Matti.

In: J GERIATR ONCOL, Vol. 4, No. 2, 01.04.2013, p. 196-201.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{60289e3c9218447aa4251b73128e7558,
title = "Modeling of treatment response to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in older (age≥70years) and younger (age<70years) patients with cancer and anemia: findings from the Anemia Cancer Treatment study",
abstract = "INTRODUCTION: The Anemia Cancer Treatment study assessed hemoglobin (Hb) outcomes following treatment with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA) in anemic (Hb≤11g/dL) patients in Europe. We replicated the original analyses stratifying by age, namely patients aged ≥70 (n=637) versus those aged<70 (n=1555).MATERIALS AND METHODS: A secondary analysis of Hb outcomes was assessed over 8-10weeks. Treatment response criteria included increases of Hb≥1g/dL, Hb≥1g/dL over 8weeks, and Hb≥2g/dL over the course of the study period.RESULTS: Mean Hb increased from similar levels of 9.5g/dL [p=not significant (ns)] at visit one to 10.9g/dL (p=ns) at visit three (both p<0.001). Patients aged≥70 had higher mean Hb at visit two (10.6g/dL vs. 10.3g/dL, p<0.001). Cohorts did not differ in treatment response rates (all p=ns). Mean performance status differed between cohorts at each visit (all p≤0.011); both groups showed significant improvements (both p<0.001). Immediacy of response was a consistent determinant but was more pronounced among patients aged≥70. Less consistent determinants included performance status in the age≥70 group, as well as hematological malignancy and Hb at ESA start in the age<70 group. The proportion of variance in Hb outcomes attributable to treatment center ranged from 0.090 to 0.289 in the age≥70 cohort and 0.126 to 0.361 in the age<70 cohort.CONCLUSIONS: Both groups achieved similar Hb levels with the age≥70 cohort showing a higher initial evolution rate and potentially a different Hb response trajectory. Patients age≥70 were more likely to benefit from ESAs if showing an early erythropoietic response and exhibiting no or little impairment in performance status. Differential attribution of variability in older vs. younger adults suggests that individualization of ESA therapy may facilitate Hb response in geriatric patients with cancer.",
keywords = "Age Factors, Aged, Anemia, Female, Hematinics, Hemoglobins, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Multicenter Studies as Topic, Neoplasms, Outcome Assessment (Health Care), Retrospective Studies",
author = "Ivo Abraham and Karen MacDonald and Soba Tharmarajah and Carsten Bokemeyer and Heinz Ludwig and Pierre Soubeyran and Vittorio Battistel and Matti Aapro",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",
year = "2013",
month = apr,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jgo.2012.09.058",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "196--201",
journal = "J GERIATR ONCOL",
issn = "1879-4068",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Modeling of treatment response to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in older (age≥70years) and younger (age<70years) patients with cancer and anemia: findings from the Anemia Cancer Treatment study

AU - Abraham, Ivo

AU - MacDonald, Karen

AU - Tharmarajah, Soba

AU - Bokemeyer, Carsten

AU - Ludwig, Heinz

AU - Soubeyran, Pierre

AU - Battistel, Vittorio

AU - Aapro, Matti

N1 - Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PY - 2013/4/1

Y1 - 2013/4/1

N2 - INTRODUCTION: The Anemia Cancer Treatment study assessed hemoglobin (Hb) outcomes following treatment with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA) in anemic (Hb≤11g/dL) patients in Europe. We replicated the original analyses stratifying by age, namely patients aged ≥70 (n=637) versus those aged<70 (n=1555).MATERIALS AND METHODS: A secondary analysis of Hb outcomes was assessed over 8-10weeks. Treatment response criteria included increases of Hb≥1g/dL, Hb≥1g/dL over 8weeks, and Hb≥2g/dL over the course of the study period.RESULTS: Mean Hb increased from similar levels of 9.5g/dL [p=not significant (ns)] at visit one to 10.9g/dL (p=ns) at visit three (both p<0.001). Patients aged≥70 had higher mean Hb at visit two (10.6g/dL vs. 10.3g/dL, p<0.001). Cohorts did not differ in treatment response rates (all p=ns). Mean performance status differed between cohorts at each visit (all p≤0.011); both groups showed significant improvements (both p<0.001). Immediacy of response was a consistent determinant but was more pronounced among patients aged≥70. Less consistent determinants included performance status in the age≥70 group, as well as hematological malignancy and Hb at ESA start in the age<70 group. The proportion of variance in Hb outcomes attributable to treatment center ranged from 0.090 to 0.289 in the age≥70 cohort and 0.126 to 0.361 in the age<70 cohort.CONCLUSIONS: Both groups achieved similar Hb levels with the age≥70 cohort showing a higher initial evolution rate and potentially a different Hb response trajectory. Patients age≥70 were more likely to benefit from ESAs if showing an early erythropoietic response and exhibiting no or little impairment in performance status. Differential attribution of variability in older vs. younger adults suggests that individualization of ESA therapy may facilitate Hb response in geriatric patients with cancer.

AB - INTRODUCTION: The Anemia Cancer Treatment study assessed hemoglobin (Hb) outcomes following treatment with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA) in anemic (Hb≤11g/dL) patients in Europe. We replicated the original analyses stratifying by age, namely patients aged ≥70 (n=637) versus those aged<70 (n=1555).MATERIALS AND METHODS: A secondary analysis of Hb outcomes was assessed over 8-10weeks. Treatment response criteria included increases of Hb≥1g/dL, Hb≥1g/dL over 8weeks, and Hb≥2g/dL over the course of the study period.RESULTS: Mean Hb increased from similar levels of 9.5g/dL [p=not significant (ns)] at visit one to 10.9g/dL (p=ns) at visit three (both p<0.001). Patients aged≥70 had higher mean Hb at visit two (10.6g/dL vs. 10.3g/dL, p<0.001). Cohorts did not differ in treatment response rates (all p=ns). Mean performance status differed between cohorts at each visit (all p≤0.011); both groups showed significant improvements (both p<0.001). Immediacy of response was a consistent determinant but was more pronounced among patients aged≥70. Less consistent determinants included performance status in the age≥70 group, as well as hematological malignancy and Hb at ESA start in the age<70 group. The proportion of variance in Hb outcomes attributable to treatment center ranged from 0.090 to 0.289 in the age≥70 cohort and 0.126 to 0.361 in the age<70 cohort.CONCLUSIONS: Both groups achieved similar Hb levels with the age≥70 cohort showing a higher initial evolution rate and potentially a different Hb response trajectory. Patients age≥70 were more likely to benefit from ESAs if showing an early erythropoietic response and exhibiting no or little impairment in performance status. Differential attribution of variability in older vs. younger adults suggests that individualization of ESA therapy may facilitate Hb response in geriatric patients with cancer.

KW - Age Factors

KW - Aged

KW - Anemia

KW - Female

KW - Hematinics

KW - Hemoglobins

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Multicenter Studies as Topic

KW - Neoplasms

KW - Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

KW - Retrospective Studies

U2 - 10.1016/j.jgo.2012.09.058

DO - 10.1016/j.jgo.2012.09.058

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 24071545

VL - 4

SP - 196

EP - 201

JO - J GERIATR ONCOL

JF - J GERIATR ONCOL

SN - 1879-4068

IS - 2

ER -