Modeling of treatment response to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents as a function of center- and patient-related variables: results from the Anemia Cancer Treatment (ACT) study.

Standard

Modeling of treatment response to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents as a function of center- and patient-related variables: results from the Anemia Cancer Treatment (ACT) study. / Aapro, M; Ludwig, H; Bokemeyer, Carsten; MacDonald, K; Soubeyran, P; Turner, M; Albrecht, T; Abraham, I.

In: ANN ONCOL, Vol. 20, No. 10, 10, 2009, p. 1714-1721.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{09a602be834b47168509357b3f0dc277,
title = "Modeling of treatment response to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents as a function of center- and patient-related variables: results from the Anemia Cancer Treatment (ACT) study.",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: In anemic cancer patients treated with erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA), (i) to examine the proportion of variance in hemoglobin (Hb) outcomes attributable to patients versus center, country, and region and (ii) to develop predictive models of treatment response. METHODS: Retrospective study with a minimum of three visits at 1-month intervals. Three hundred and seven centers in 13 European countries contributed 2192 anemic ESA-treated cancer patients. Treatment response criteria included: Hb increase > or =1 g/dl, Hb increase > or =1 g/dl within 8 weeks, hematopoietic response (Hb increase > or =2 g/dl or Hb > or = 12 g/dl), Hb increase > or =2 g/dl, and Hb between 12 and 13 g/dl. RESULTS: Hb increased from 9.54 +/- 0.95 g/dl (baseline) to 10.88 +/- 1.49 g/dl (visit 3). Hb change from visits 1 to 2 (index of relative immediacy of response to ESA) averaged 0.81 +/- 1.17 g/dl. The proportion of variance in Hb outcomes attributable to center was 11.8%-34.3%, country 2.9%-20.7%, and region 0.0%-7.6%. Immediacy of response to ESA was the most prevalent predictor of treatment response, followed by diagnosis of hematological malignancy and age",
author = "M Aapro and H Ludwig and Carsten Bokemeyer and K MacDonald and P Soubeyran and M Turner and T Albrecht and I Abraham",
year = "2009",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "20",
pages = "1714--1721",
journal = "ANN ONCOL",
issn = "0923-7534",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Modeling of treatment response to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents as a function of center- and patient-related variables: results from the Anemia Cancer Treatment (ACT) study.

AU - Aapro, M

AU - Ludwig, H

AU - Bokemeyer, Carsten

AU - MacDonald, K

AU - Soubeyran, P

AU - Turner, M

AU - Albrecht, T

AU - Abraham, I

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - BACKGROUND: In anemic cancer patients treated with erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA), (i) to examine the proportion of variance in hemoglobin (Hb) outcomes attributable to patients versus center, country, and region and (ii) to develop predictive models of treatment response. METHODS: Retrospective study with a minimum of three visits at 1-month intervals. Three hundred and seven centers in 13 European countries contributed 2192 anemic ESA-treated cancer patients. Treatment response criteria included: Hb increase > or =1 g/dl, Hb increase > or =1 g/dl within 8 weeks, hematopoietic response (Hb increase > or =2 g/dl or Hb > or = 12 g/dl), Hb increase > or =2 g/dl, and Hb between 12 and 13 g/dl. RESULTS: Hb increased from 9.54 +/- 0.95 g/dl (baseline) to 10.88 +/- 1.49 g/dl (visit 3). Hb change from visits 1 to 2 (index of relative immediacy of response to ESA) averaged 0.81 +/- 1.17 g/dl. The proportion of variance in Hb outcomes attributable to center was 11.8%-34.3%, country 2.9%-20.7%, and region 0.0%-7.6%. Immediacy of response to ESA was the most prevalent predictor of treatment response, followed by diagnosis of hematological malignancy and age

AB - BACKGROUND: In anemic cancer patients treated with erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA), (i) to examine the proportion of variance in hemoglobin (Hb) outcomes attributable to patients versus center, country, and region and (ii) to develop predictive models of treatment response. METHODS: Retrospective study with a minimum of three visits at 1-month intervals. Three hundred and seven centers in 13 European countries contributed 2192 anemic ESA-treated cancer patients. Treatment response criteria included: Hb increase > or =1 g/dl, Hb increase > or =1 g/dl within 8 weeks, hematopoietic response (Hb increase > or =2 g/dl or Hb > or = 12 g/dl), Hb increase > or =2 g/dl, and Hb between 12 and 13 g/dl. RESULTS: Hb increased from 9.54 +/- 0.95 g/dl (baseline) to 10.88 +/- 1.49 g/dl (visit 3). Hb change from visits 1 to 2 (index of relative immediacy of response to ESA) averaged 0.81 +/- 1.17 g/dl. The proportion of variance in Hb outcomes attributable to center was 11.8%-34.3%, country 2.9%-20.7%, and region 0.0%-7.6%. Immediacy of response to ESA was the most prevalent predictor of treatment response, followed by diagnosis of hematological malignancy and age

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

VL - 20

SP - 1714

EP - 1721

JO - ANN ONCOL

JF - ANN ONCOL

SN - 0923-7534

IS - 10

M1 - 10

ER -