Research ExplorerPublicationsMitforschen, aber wie? Entwicklung und Evaluation eines Fors...

Mitforschen, aber wie? Entwicklung und Evaluation eines Forschungstrainings für Psychiatrieerfahrene

Standard

Mitforschen, aber wie? Entwicklung und Evaluation eines Forschungstrainings für Psychiatrieerfahrene. / Brütt, Anna Levke; Bernges, Tabea; Magaard, Julia; Sielaff, Gyöngyvér; EX-IN-Pilots.

In: PSYCHIAT PRAX, Vol. 44, No. 2, 03.2017, p. 99-104.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journal › SCORING: Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Brütt, AL, Bernges, T, Magaard, J, Sielaff, G & EX-IN-Pilots 2017, 'Mitforschen, aber wie? Entwicklung und Evaluation eines Forschungstrainings für Psychiatrieerfahrene', PSYCHIAT PRAX, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 99-104. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-108968

APA

Brütt, A. L., Bernges, T., Magaard, J., Sielaff, G., & EX-IN-Pilots (2017). Mitforschen, aber wie? Entwicklung und Evaluation eines Forschungstrainings für Psychiatrieerfahrene. PSYCHIAT PRAX, 44(2), 99-104. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-108968

Vancouver

Brütt AL, Bernges T, Magaard J, Sielaff G, EX-IN-Pilots. Mitforschen, aber wie? Entwicklung und Evaluation eines Forschungstrainings für Psychiatrieerfahrene. PSYCHIAT PRAX. 2017 Mar;44(2):99-104. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-108968

Bibtex

@article{99b10015813346da82cfc40561b841c6,
title = "Mitforschen, aber wie? Entwicklung und Evaluation eines Forschungstrainings f{\"u}r Psychiatrieerfahrene",
abstract = "Objective Participation of mental health services users in research is increasingly acknowledged in Germany. Principles for successful involvement include research training for service users. The aims of the project were (1) to develop and (2) to evaluate a research training. Methods The research training was developed in five participatory meetings and piloted with 28 participants. They answered questions on the research training and about their interest in research, research-related empowerment and research participation. Results Interest in research did not change. But there is a difference between research-related empowerment before (t1) and after (t2) the research training (z = - 2.237; p = 0.025). The number of participants registered in scientific studies increased from 4 (t1) to 8 three months later (t3) whereas the number of participants reporting own research ideas decreased from 7 (t1) to 5 (t3). Conclusion Although interest has not been affected, the evaluation shows significant effects on research-related empowerment in participants. Results concerning transfer are divergent. However, feedback was positive. We are planning to disseminate and refine the training.",
keywords = "Adult, Biomedical Research, Curriculum, Female, Germany, Hospitals, University, Humans, Male, Mental Disorders, Middle Aged, Patient Participation, Patient Satisfaction, Pilot Projects, Power (Psychology), Program Evaluation, Psychiatry, Transfer (Psychology), Evaluation Studies, Journal Article",
author = "Br{\"u}tt, {Anna Levke} and Tabea Bernges and Julia Magaard and Gy{\"o}ngyv{\'e}r Sielaff and EX-IN-Pilots",
note = "{\textcopyright} Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.",
year = "2017",
month = mar,
doi = "10.1055/s-0041-108968",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "44",
pages = "99--104",
journal = "PSYCHIAT PRAX",
issn = "0303-4259",
publisher = "Georg Thieme Verlag KG",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mitforschen, aber wie? Entwicklung und Evaluation eines Forschungstrainings für Psychiatrieerfahrene

AU - Brütt, Anna Levke

AU - Bernges, Tabea

AU - Magaard, Julia

AU - Sielaff, Gyöngyvér

AU - EX-IN-Pilots

N1 - © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

PY - 2017/3

Y1 - 2017/3

N2 - Objective Participation of mental health services users in research is increasingly acknowledged in Germany. Principles for successful involvement include research training for service users. The aims of the project were (1) to develop and (2) to evaluate a research training. Methods The research training was developed in five participatory meetings and piloted with 28 participants. They answered questions on the research training and about their interest in research, research-related empowerment and research participation. Results Interest in research did not change. But there is a difference between research-related empowerment before (t1) and after (t2) the research training (z = - 2.237; p = 0.025). The number of participants registered in scientific studies increased from 4 (t1) to 8 three months later (t3) whereas the number of participants reporting own research ideas decreased from 7 (t1) to 5 (t3). Conclusion Although interest has not been affected, the evaluation shows significant effects on research-related empowerment in participants. Results concerning transfer are divergent. However, feedback was positive. We are planning to disseminate and refine the training.

AB - Objective Participation of mental health services users in research is increasingly acknowledged in Germany. Principles for successful involvement include research training for service users. The aims of the project were (1) to develop and (2) to evaluate a research training. Methods The research training was developed in five participatory meetings and piloted with 28 participants. They answered questions on the research training and about their interest in research, research-related empowerment and research participation. Results Interest in research did not change. But there is a difference between research-related empowerment before (t1) and after (t2) the research training (z = - 2.237; p = 0.025). The number of participants registered in scientific studies increased from 4 (t1) to 8 three months later (t3) whereas the number of participants reporting own research ideas decreased from 7 (t1) to 5 (t3). Conclusion Although interest has not been affected, the evaluation shows significant effects on research-related empowerment in participants. Results concerning transfer are divergent. However, feedback was positive. We are planning to disseminate and refine the training.

KW - Adult

KW - Biomedical Research

KW - Curriculum

KW - Female

KW - Germany

KW - Hospitals, University

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Mental Disorders

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Patient Participation

KW - Patient Satisfaction

KW - Pilot Projects

KW - Power (Psychology)

KW - Program Evaluation

KW - Psychiatry

KW - Transfer (Psychology)

KW - Evaluation Studies

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1055/s-0041-108968

DO - 10.1055/s-0041-108968

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

C2 - 26668092

VL - 44

SP - 99

EP - 104

JO - PSYCHIAT PRAX

JF - PSYCHIAT PRAX

SN - 0303-4259

IS - 2

ER -