[Memorandum registry for health services research].

Standard

[Memorandum registry for health services research]. / Müller, D; Augustin, Matthias; Banik, N; Baumann, W; Bestehorn, K; Kieschke, J; Lefering, R; Maier, B; Mathis, S; Rustenbach, Stephan Jeff; Sauerland, S; Semler, S C; Stausberg, J; Sturm, H; Unger, C; Neugebauer, E A M.

In: GESUNDHEITSWESEN, Vol. 72, No. 11, 11, 2010, p. 824-839.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Müller, D, Augustin, M, Banik, N, Baumann, W, Bestehorn, K, Kieschke, J, Lefering, R, Maier, B, Mathis, S, Rustenbach, SJ, Sauerland, S, Semler, SC, Stausberg, J, Sturm, H, Unger, C & Neugebauer, EAM 2010, '[Memorandum registry for health services research].', GESUNDHEITSWESEN, vol. 72, no. 11, 11, pp. 824-839. <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20872343?dopt=Citation>

APA

Müller, D., Augustin, M., Banik, N., Baumann, W., Bestehorn, K., Kieschke, J., Lefering, R., Maier, B., Mathis, S., Rustenbach, S. J., Sauerland, S., Semler, S. C., Stausberg, J., Sturm, H., Unger, C., & Neugebauer, E. A. M. (2010). [Memorandum registry for health services research]. GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 72(11), 824-839. [11]. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20872343?dopt=Citation

Vancouver

Müller D, Augustin M, Banik N, Baumann W, Bestehorn K, Kieschke J et al. [Memorandum registry for health services research]. GESUNDHEITSWESEN. 2010;72(11):824-839. 11.

Bibtex

@article{c1cc9ee504764e21b3835b7d70f419bd,
title = "[Memorandum registry for health services research].",
abstract = "On August 30, 2010, the German Network for Health Services Research [Deutsches Netzwerk Versorgungsforschung e. V. (DNVF e. V.)] approved the Memorandum III {"}Methods for Health Services Research{"}, supported by their member societies mentioned as authors and published in this Journal [Gesundheitswesen 2010; 72: 739-748]. Registries in Health Services Research vary in their aims and research questions as well as in their designs, methods of data collection, and statistical analyses. This paper aims to provide both a methodological guideline for developers to ensure a high quality of a planned registry and, to provide an instrument for users of data from registries to assess their overall quality. First, the paper provides a definition of registries and presents an overview of objectives in Health Services Research where registries can be useful. Second, several areas of methodological importance for the development of registries are presented. This includes the different phases of a registry (i. e., conceptual and preliminary design, implementation), technical organisation of a registry, statistical analysis, reporting of results, data protection, and ethical/legal aspects. From these areas, several criteria are deduced to allow the assessment of the quality of a registry. Finally, a checklist to assess a registry's quality is presented.",
author = "D M{\"u}ller and Matthias Augustin and N Banik and W Baumann and K Bestehorn and J Kieschke and R Lefering and B Maier and S Mathis and Rustenbach, {Stephan Jeff} and S Sauerland and Semler, {S C} and J Stausberg and H Sturm and C Unger and Neugebauer, {E A M}",
year = "2010",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "72",
pages = "824--839",
journal = "GESUNDHEITSWESEN",
issn = "0941-3790",
publisher = "Georg Thieme Verlag KG",
number = "11",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - [Memorandum registry for health services research].

AU - Müller, D

AU - Augustin, Matthias

AU - Banik, N

AU - Baumann, W

AU - Bestehorn, K

AU - Kieschke, J

AU - Lefering, R

AU - Maier, B

AU - Mathis, S

AU - Rustenbach, Stephan Jeff

AU - Sauerland, S

AU - Semler, S C

AU - Stausberg, J

AU - Sturm, H

AU - Unger, C

AU - Neugebauer, E A M

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - On August 30, 2010, the German Network for Health Services Research [Deutsches Netzwerk Versorgungsforschung e. V. (DNVF e. V.)] approved the Memorandum III "Methods for Health Services Research", supported by their member societies mentioned as authors and published in this Journal [Gesundheitswesen 2010; 72: 739-748]. Registries in Health Services Research vary in their aims and research questions as well as in their designs, methods of data collection, and statistical analyses. This paper aims to provide both a methodological guideline for developers to ensure a high quality of a planned registry and, to provide an instrument for users of data from registries to assess their overall quality. First, the paper provides a definition of registries and presents an overview of objectives in Health Services Research where registries can be useful. Second, several areas of methodological importance for the development of registries are presented. This includes the different phases of a registry (i. e., conceptual and preliminary design, implementation), technical organisation of a registry, statistical analysis, reporting of results, data protection, and ethical/legal aspects. From these areas, several criteria are deduced to allow the assessment of the quality of a registry. Finally, a checklist to assess a registry's quality is presented.

AB - On August 30, 2010, the German Network for Health Services Research [Deutsches Netzwerk Versorgungsforschung e. V. (DNVF e. V.)] approved the Memorandum III "Methods for Health Services Research", supported by their member societies mentioned as authors and published in this Journal [Gesundheitswesen 2010; 72: 739-748]. Registries in Health Services Research vary in their aims and research questions as well as in their designs, methods of data collection, and statistical analyses. This paper aims to provide both a methodological guideline for developers to ensure a high quality of a planned registry and, to provide an instrument for users of data from registries to assess their overall quality. First, the paper provides a definition of registries and presents an overview of objectives in Health Services Research where registries can be useful. Second, several areas of methodological importance for the development of registries are presented. This includes the different phases of a registry (i. e., conceptual and preliminary design, implementation), technical organisation of a registry, statistical analysis, reporting of results, data protection, and ethical/legal aspects. From these areas, several criteria are deduced to allow the assessment of the quality of a registry. Finally, a checklist to assess a registry's quality is presented.

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

VL - 72

SP - 824

EP - 839

JO - GESUNDHEITSWESEN

JF - GESUNDHEITSWESEN

SN - 0941-3790

IS - 11

M1 - 11

ER -