Measurement Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Pruritus: An Updated Systematic Review

Standard

Measurement Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Pruritus: An Updated Systematic Review. / Topp, Janine; Apfelbacher, Christian; Ständer, Sonja; Augustin, Matthias; Blome, Christine.

In: J INVEST DERMATOL, Vol. 142, No. 2, 02.2022, p. 343-354.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Review articleResearch

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{92a8f3b617a9452e91cf05e5ae498a34,
title = "Measurement Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Pruritus: An Updated Systematic Review",
abstract = "This systematic review aims to provide an update on measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures for pruritus. A Medline literature search was conducted to update the systematic review published in this journal in 2017 and to identify new validation studies published between October 2015 and July 2019. The methodological quality of validation studies was assessed on the basis of the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist, and the measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures were evaluated. A total of 19 new studies were included and added to the 22 studies identified in the previously published review. Evidence from all the 41 studies evaluating 38 different measures was summarized. Outcome measures were mapped to one of three constructs where possible: pruritus intensity, pruritus severity, pruritus-specific health-related QOL. COSMIN rating revealed mixed results, with deficiencies in the methodological quality of many studies across all constructs. The most appropriate pruritus severity measure was the Itch Severity Scale. ItchyQoL and the disease-specific Uremic Pruritus in Dialysis Scale achieved the most promising results considering the construct pruritus-specific health-related QOL. For pruritus intensity, nine measures performed similarly well.",
author = "Janine Topp and Christian Apfelbacher and Sonja St{\"a}nder and Matthias Augustin and Christine Blome",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",
year = "2022",
month = feb,
doi = "10.1016/j.jid.2021.06.032",
language = "English",
volume = "142",
pages = "343--354",
journal = "J INVEST DERMATOL",
issn = "0022-202X",
publisher = "NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measurement Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Pruritus: An Updated Systematic Review

AU - Topp, Janine

AU - Apfelbacher, Christian

AU - Ständer, Sonja

AU - Augustin, Matthias

AU - Blome, Christine

N1 - Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PY - 2022/2

Y1 - 2022/2

N2 - This systematic review aims to provide an update on measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures for pruritus. A Medline literature search was conducted to update the systematic review published in this journal in 2017 and to identify new validation studies published between October 2015 and July 2019. The methodological quality of validation studies was assessed on the basis of the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist, and the measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures were evaluated. A total of 19 new studies were included and added to the 22 studies identified in the previously published review. Evidence from all the 41 studies evaluating 38 different measures was summarized. Outcome measures were mapped to one of three constructs where possible: pruritus intensity, pruritus severity, pruritus-specific health-related QOL. COSMIN rating revealed mixed results, with deficiencies in the methodological quality of many studies across all constructs. The most appropriate pruritus severity measure was the Itch Severity Scale. ItchyQoL and the disease-specific Uremic Pruritus in Dialysis Scale achieved the most promising results considering the construct pruritus-specific health-related QOL. For pruritus intensity, nine measures performed similarly well.

AB - This systematic review aims to provide an update on measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures for pruritus. A Medline literature search was conducted to update the systematic review published in this journal in 2017 and to identify new validation studies published between October 2015 and July 2019. The methodological quality of validation studies was assessed on the basis of the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist, and the measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures were evaluated. A total of 19 new studies were included and added to the 22 studies identified in the previously published review. Evidence from all the 41 studies evaluating 38 different measures was summarized. Outcome measures were mapped to one of three constructs where possible: pruritus intensity, pruritus severity, pruritus-specific health-related QOL. COSMIN rating revealed mixed results, with deficiencies in the methodological quality of many studies across all constructs. The most appropriate pruritus severity measure was the Itch Severity Scale. ItchyQoL and the disease-specific Uremic Pruritus in Dialysis Scale achieved the most promising results considering the construct pruritus-specific health-related QOL. For pruritus intensity, nine measures performed similarly well.

U2 - 10.1016/j.jid.2021.06.032

DO - 10.1016/j.jid.2021.06.032

M3 - SCORING: Review article

C2 - 34339743

VL - 142

SP - 343

EP - 354

JO - J INVEST DERMATOL

JF - J INVEST DERMATOL

SN - 0022-202X

IS - 2

ER -