Marking wire placement for improved accuracy in thoracic spinal surgery

Standard

Marking wire placement for improved accuracy in thoracic spinal surgery. / Ahmadi, Sebastian A; Slotty, Philipp J; Schröter, Catharina; Kröpil, Patric; Steiger, Hans-Jakob; Eicker, Sven O.

In: CLIN NEUROL NEUROSUR, Vol. 119, 2014, p. 100-5.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Ahmadi, SA, Slotty, PJ, Schröter, C, Kröpil, P, Steiger, H-J & Eicker, SO 2014, 'Marking wire placement for improved accuracy in thoracic spinal surgery', CLIN NEUROL NEUROSUR, vol. 119, pp. 100-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.01.025

APA

Ahmadi, S. A., Slotty, P. J., Schröter, C., Kröpil, P., Steiger, H-J., & Eicker, S. O. (2014). Marking wire placement for improved accuracy in thoracic spinal surgery. CLIN NEUROL NEUROSUR, 119, 100-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.01.025

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{d54eb767ea974c0bb5c2207c5187ce0b,
title = "Marking wire placement for improved accuracy in thoracic spinal surgery",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To present an innovative approach that does not rely on intraoperative X-ray imaging for identifying thoracic target levels and critically appraise its value in reducing the risk of wrong-level surgery and radiation exposure.METHODS: 96 patients admitted for surgery of the thoracic spine were prospectively enrolled, undergoing a total of 99 marking wire placements. Preoperatively a flexible marking wire derived from breast cancer surgery was inserted with computed tomography (CT) guidance at the site of interest--the wire was then used as an intraoperative guidance tool.RESULTS: Wire placement was considered successful in 96 cases (97%). Most common pathologies were tumors (62.5%) and degenerative disorders (16.7%). Effective doses from CT imaging were significantly higher for wire placements in the upper third of the thoracic spine compared to the lower two thirds (p = 0.015). Radiation exposure to operating room personnel could be reduced by more than 90% in all non-instrumented cases. No adverse reactions were observed, one patient (1.04%) underwent surgical revision due to an epifascial empyema. No wires had to be removed due to lack of patient compliance or infection.CONCLUSIONS: This is a safe and practical approach to identify the level of interest in thoracic spinal surgery employing a marking wire. Its application merits consideration in any spinal case where X-ray localization could prove unsafe, particularly in cases lacking bony pathologies such as intradural tumors.",
keywords = "Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cohort Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Medical Staff, Hospital, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Radiation Injuries, Spinal Cord Diseases, Spinal Diseases, Surgery, Computer-Assisted, Surgical Instruments, Thoracic Vertebrae, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Young Adult",
author = "Ahmadi, {Sebastian A} and Slotty, {Philipp J} and Catharina Schr{\"o}ter and Patric Kr{\"o}pil and Hans-Jakob Steiger and Eicker, {Sven O}",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.01.025",
language = "English",
volume = "119",
pages = "100--5",
journal = "CLIN NEUROL NEUROSUR",
issn = "0303-8467",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Marking wire placement for improved accuracy in thoracic spinal surgery

AU - Ahmadi, Sebastian A

AU - Slotty, Philipp J

AU - Schröter, Catharina

AU - Kröpil, Patric

AU - Steiger, Hans-Jakob

AU - Eicker, Sven O

N1 - Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To present an innovative approach that does not rely on intraoperative X-ray imaging for identifying thoracic target levels and critically appraise its value in reducing the risk of wrong-level surgery and radiation exposure.METHODS: 96 patients admitted for surgery of the thoracic spine were prospectively enrolled, undergoing a total of 99 marking wire placements. Preoperatively a flexible marking wire derived from breast cancer surgery was inserted with computed tomography (CT) guidance at the site of interest--the wire was then used as an intraoperative guidance tool.RESULTS: Wire placement was considered successful in 96 cases (97%). Most common pathologies were tumors (62.5%) and degenerative disorders (16.7%). Effective doses from CT imaging were significantly higher for wire placements in the upper third of the thoracic spine compared to the lower two thirds (p = 0.015). Radiation exposure to operating room personnel could be reduced by more than 90% in all non-instrumented cases. No adverse reactions were observed, one patient (1.04%) underwent surgical revision due to an epifascial empyema. No wires had to be removed due to lack of patient compliance or infection.CONCLUSIONS: This is a safe and practical approach to identify the level of interest in thoracic spinal surgery employing a marking wire. Its application merits consideration in any spinal case where X-ray localization could prove unsafe, particularly in cases lacking bony pathologies such as intradural tumors.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To present an innovative approach that does not rely on intraoperative X-ray imaging for identifying thoracic target levels and critically appraise its value in reducing the risk of wrong-level surgery and radiation exposure.METHODS: 96 patients admitted for surgery of the thoracic spine were prospectively enrolled, undergoing a total of 99 marking wire placements. Preoperatively a flexible marking wire derived from breast cancer surgery was inserted with computed tomography (CT) guidance at the site of interest--the wire was then used as an intraoperative guidance tool.RESULTS: Wire placement was considered successful in 96 cases (97%). Most common pathologies were tumors (62.5%) and degenerative disorders (16.7%). Effective doses from CT imaging were significantly higher for wire placements in the upper third of the thoracic spine compared to the lower two thirds (p = 0.015). Radiation exposure to operating room personnel could be reduced by more than 90% in all non-instrumented cases. No adverse reactions were observed, one patient (1.04%) underwent surgical revision due to an epifascial empyema. No wires had to be removed due to lack of patient compliance or infection.CONCLUSIONS: This is a safe and practical approach to identify the level of interest in thoracic spinal surgery employing a marking wire. Its application merits consideration in any spinal case where X-ray localization could prove unsafe, particularly in cases lacking bony pathologies such as intradural tumors.

KW - Adolescent

KW - Adult

KW - Aged

KW - Aged, 80 and over

KW - Cohort Studies

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Medical Staff, Hospital

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Prospective Studies

KW - Radiation Injuries

KW - Spinal Cord Diseases

KW - Spinal Diseases

KW - Surgery, Computer-Assisted

KW - Surgical Instruments

KW - Thoracic Vertebrae

KW - Tomography, X-Ray Computed

KW - Young Adult

U2 - 10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.01.025

DO - 10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.01.025

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 24635936

VL - 119

SP - 100

EP - 105

JO - CLIN NEUROL NEUROSUR

JF - CLIN NEUROL NEUROSUR

SN - 0303-8467

ER -