Magnetically Guided Capsule Versus Conventional Gastroscopy for Upper Abdominal Complaints: A Prospective Blinded Study

Standard

Magnetically Guided Capsule Versus Conventional Gastroscopy for Upper Abdominal Complaints: A Prospective Blinded Study. / Denzer, Ulrike W; Rösch, Thomas; Hoytat, Bilal; Abdel-Hamid, Mohammed; Hebuterne, Xavier; Vanbiervielt, Geoffroy; Filippi, Jérôme; Ogata, Haruiko; Hosoe, Naoki; Ohtsuka, Kazuo; Ogata, Noriyuki; Ikeda, Keiichi; Aihara, Hiroyuki; Kudo, Shin-Ei; Tajiri, Hisao; Treszl, Andras; Wegscheider, Karl; Greff, Michel; Rey, Jean-Francois.

In: J CLIN GASTROENTEROL, 10.03.2014.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Denzer, UW, Rösch, T, Hoytat, B, Abdel-Hamid, M, Hebuterne, X, Vanbiervielt, G, Filippi, J, Ogata, H, Hosoe, N, Ohtsuka, K, Ogata, N, Ikeda, K, Aihara, H, Kudo, S-E, Tajiri, H, Treszl, A, Wegscheider, K, Greff, M & Rey, J-F 2014, 'Magnetically Guided Capsule Versus Conventional Gastroscopy for Upper Abdominal Complaints: A Prospective Blinded Study', J CLIN GASTROENTEROL. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000000110

APA

Denzer, U. W., Rösch, T., Hoytat, B., Abdel-Hamid, M., Hebuterne, X., Vanbiervielt, G., Filippi, J., Ogata, H., Hosoe, N., Ohtsuka, K., Ogata, N., Ikeda, K., Aihara, H., Kudo, S-E., Tajiri, H., Treszl, A., Wegscheider, K., Greff, M., & Rey, J-F. (2014). Magnetically Guided Capsule Versus Conventional Gastroscopy for Upper Abdominal Complaints: A Prospective Blinded Study. J CLIN GASTROENTEROL. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000000110

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{a3325ca8606f492dbc666370fcb1cfaa,
title = "Magnetically Guided Capsule Versus Conventional Gastroscopy for Upper Abdominal Complaints: A Prospective Blinded Study",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES:: Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is mostly performed under sedation and has a low yield of relevant gastric lesions in patients without alarm symptoms. Simpler screening tests such as capsule endoscopy could be helpful, but gastric visualization is insufficient with the current passive capsules. A magnetically guided gastric capsule was prospectively evaluated in patients with routine indications for gastroscopy.METHODS:: A total of 189 symptomatic patients (105 male; mean age 53 y) from 2 French centers subsequently and blindly underwent capsule and conventional gastroscopy by 9 and 6 examiners, respectively. The final gold standard was unblinded conventional gastroscopy with biopsy under propofol sedation. Main outcome was accuracy (sensitivity/specificity) of capsule gastroscopy for diagnosis of major gastric lesions, defined as those lesions requiring conventional gastroscopy for biopsy or removal.RESULTS:: Twenty-three major lesions were found in 21 patients. Capsule accuracy was 90.5% [95% confidence interval (CI), 85.4%-94.3%] with a specificity of 94.1% (95% CI, 89.3%-97.1%) and a sensitivity of 61.9% (95% CI, 38%-82%). Accuracy did not correlate with lesion location, gastric luminal visibility, examiner case volume, or examination time. Of the remaining 168 patients, 94% had minor and mostly multiple lesions; the capsule made a correct diagnosis in 88.1% (95% CI, 82.2%-92.6%), with gastric visibility and lesion location in the proximal stomach having significant influence. All patients preferred capsule gastroscopy.CONCLUSIONS:: In a prospective and strictly blinded study, magnetically guided capsule gastroscopy was shown to be feasible in clinical practice and was clearly preferred by patients. Improvements in capsule technology may render this technique a future alternative to gastroscopy.",
author = "Denzer, {Ulrike W} and Thomas R{\"o}sch and Bilal Hoytat and Mohammed Abdel-Hamid and Xavier Hebuterne and Geoffroy Vanbiervielt and J{\'e}r{\^o}me Filippi and Haruiko Ogata and Naoki Hosoe and Kazuo Ohtsuka and Noriyuki Ogata and Keiichi Ikeda and Hiroyuki Aihara and Shin-Ei Kudo and Hisao Tajiri and Andras Treszl and Karl Wegscheider and Michel Greff and Jean-Francois Rey",
year = "2014",
month = mar,
day = "10",
doi = "10.1097/MCG.0000000000000110",
language = "English",
journal = "J CLIN GASTROENTEROL",
issn = "0192-0790",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Magnetically Guided Capsule Versus Conventional Gastroscopy for Upper Abdominal Complaints: A Prospective Blinded Study

AU - Denzer, Ulrike W

AU - Rösch, Thomas

AU - Hoytat, Bilal

AU - Abdel-Hamid, Mohammed

AU - Hebuterne, Xavier

AU - Vanbiervielt, Geoffroy

AU - Filippi, Jérôme

AU - Ogata, Haruiko

AU - Hosoe, Naoki

AU - Ohtsuka, Kazuo

AU - Ogata, Noriyuki

AU - Ikeda, Keiichi

AU - Aihara, Hiroyuki

AU - Kudo, Shin-Ei

AU - Tajiri, Hisao

AU - Treszl, Andras

AU - Wegscheider, Karl

AU - Greff, Michel

AU - Rey, Jean-Francois

PY - 2014/3/10

Y1 - 2014/3/10

N2 - OBJECTIVES:: Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is mostly performed under sedation and has a low yield of relevant gastric lesions in patients without alarm symptoms. Simpler screening tests such as capsule endoscopy could be helpful, but gastric visualization is insufficient with the current passive capsules. A magnetically guided gastric capsule was prospectively evaluated in patients with routine indications for gastroscopy.METHODS:: A total of 189 symptomatic patients (105 male; mean age 53 y) from 2 French centers subsequently and blindly underwent capsule and conventional gastroscopy by 9 and 6 examiners, respectively. The final gold standard was unblinded conventional gastroscopy with biopsy under propofol sedation. Main outcome was accuracy (sensitivity/specificity) of capsule gastroscopy for diagnosis of major gastric lesions, defined as those lesions requiring conventional gastroscopy for biopsy or removal.RESULTS:: Twenty-three major lesions were found in 21 patients. Capsule accuracy was 90.5% [95% confidence interval (CI), 85.4%-94.3%] with a specificity of 94.1% (95% CI, 89.3%-97.1%) and a sensitivity of 61.9% (95% CI, 38%-82%). Accuracy did not correlate with lesion location, gastric luminal visibility, examiner case volume, or examination time. Of the remaining 168 patients, 94% had minor and mostly multiple lesions; the capsule made a correct diagnosis in 88.1% (95% CI, 82.2%-92.6%), with gastric visibility and lesion location in the proximal stomach having significant influence. All patients preferred capsule gastroscopy.CONCLUSIONS:: In a prospective and strictly blinded study, magnetically guided capsule gastroscopy was shown to be feasible in clinical practice and was clearly preferred by patients. Improvements in capsule technology may render this technique a future alternative to gastroscopy.

AB - OBJECTIVES:: Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is mostly performed under sedation and has a low yield of relevant gastric lesions in patients without alarm symptoms. Simpler screening tests such as capsule endoscopy could be helpful, but gastric visualization is insufficient with the current passive capsules. A magnetically guided gastric capsule was prospectively evaluated in patients with routine indications for gastroscopy.METHODS:: A total of 189 symptomatic patients (105 male; mean age 53 y) from 2 French centers subsequently and blindly underwent capsule and conventional gastroscopy by 9 and 6 examiners, respectively. The final gold standard was unblinded conventional gastroscopy with biopsy under propofol sedation. Main outcome was accuracy (sensitivity/specificity) of capsule gastroscopy for diagnosis of major gastric lesions, defined as those lesions requiring conventional gastroscopy for biopsy or removal.RESULTS:: Twenty-three major lesions were found in 21 patients. Capsule accuracy was 90.5% [95% confidence interval (CI), 85.4%-94.3%] with a specificity of 94.1% (95% CI, 89.3%-97.1%) and a sensitivity of 61.9% (95% CI, 38%-82%). Accuracy did not correlate with lesion location, gastric luminal visibility, examiner case volume, or examination time. Of the remaining 168 patients, 94% had minor and mostly multiple lesions; the capsule made a correct diagnosis in 88.1% (95% CI, 82.2%-92.6%), with gastric visibility and lesion location in the proximal stomach having significant influence. All patients preferred capsule gastroscopy.CONCLUSIONS:: In a prospective and strictly blinded study, magnetically guided capsule gastroscopy was shown to be feasible in clinical practice and was clearly preferred by patients. Improvements in capsule technology may render this technique a future alternative to gastroscopy.

U2 - 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000110

DO - 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000110

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 24618504

JO - J CLIN GASTROENTEROL

JF - J CLIN GASTROENTEROL

SN - 0192-0790

ER -