Long-term (180-Day) Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19 in the REMAP-CAP Randomized Clinical Trial
Standard
Long-term (180-Day) Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19 in the REMAP-CAP Randomized Clinical Trial. / Higgins, Alisa M; Berry, Lindsay R; Lorenzi, Elizabeth; Murthy, Srinivas; McQuilten, Zoe; Mouncey, Paul R; Al-Beidh, Farah; Annane, Djillali; Arabi, Yaseen M; Beane, Abi; van Bentum-Puijk, Wilma; Bhimani, Zahra; Bonten, Marc J M; Bradbury, Charlotte A; Brunkhorst, Frank M; Burrell, Aiden; Buzgau, Adrian; Buxton, Meredith; Charles, Walton N; Cove, Matthew; Detry, Michelle A; Estcourt, Lise J; Fagbodun, Elizabeth O; Fitzgerald, Mark; Girard, Timothy D; Goligher, Ewan C; Goossens, Herman; Haniffa, Rashan; Hills, Thomas; Horvat, Christopher M; Huang, David T; Ichihara, Nao; Lamontagne, Francois; Marshall, John C; McAuley, Daniel F; McGlothlin, Anna; McGuinness, Shay P; McVerry, Bryan J; Neal, Matthew D; Nichol, Alistair D; Parke, Rachael L; Parker, Jane C; Parry-Billings, Karen; Peters, Sam E C; Reyes, Luis F; Rowan, Kathryn M; Saito, Hiroki; Santos, Marlene S; Saunders, Christina T; Serpa-Neto, Ary; Seymour, Christopher W; Shankar-Hari, Manu; Stronach, Lucy M; Turgeon, Alexis F; Turner, Anne M; van de Veerdonk, Frank L; Zarychanski, Ryan; Green, Cameron; Lewis, Roger J; Angus, Derek C; McArthur, Colin J; Berry, Scott; Derde, Lennie P G; Gordon, Anthony C; Webb, Steve A; Lawler, Patrick R; Writing Committee for the REMAP-CAP Investigators.
In: JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, Vol. 329, No. 1, 03.01.2023, p. 39-51.Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journal › SCORING: Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Long-term (180-Day) Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19 in the REMAP-CAP Randomized Clinical Trial
AU - Higgins, Alisa M
AU - Berry, Lindsay R
AU - Lorenzi, Elizabeth
AU - Murthy, Srinivas
AU - McQuilten, Zoe
AU - Mouncey, Paul R
AU - Al-Beidh, Farah
AU - Annane, Djillali
AU - Arabi, Yaseen M
AU - Beane, Abi
AU - van Bentum-Puijk, Wilma
AU - Bhimani, Zahra
AU - Bonten, Marc J M
AU - Bradbury, Charlotte A
AU - Brunkhorst, Frank M
AU - Burrell, Aiden
AU - Buzgau, Adrian
AU - Buxton, Meredith
AU - Charles, Walton N
AU - Cove, Matthew
AU - Detry, Michelle A
AU - Estcourt, Lise J
AU - Fagbodun, Elizabeth O
AU - Fitzgerald, Mark
AU - Girard, Timothy D
AU - Goligher, Ewan C
AU - Goossens, Herman
AU - Haniffa, Rashan
AU - Hills, Thomas
AU - Horvat, Christopher M
AU - Huang, David T
AU - Ichihara, Nao
AU - Lamontagne, Francois
AU - Marshall, John C
AU - McAuley, Daniel F
AU - McGlothlin, Anna
AU - McGuinness, Shay P
AU - McVerry, Bryan J
AU - Neal, Matthew D
AU - Nichol, Alistair D
AU - Parke, Rachael L
AU - Parker, Jane C
AU - Parry-Billings, Karen
AU - Peters, Sam E C
AU - Reyes, Luis F
AU - Rowan, Kathryn M
AU - Saito, Hiroki
AU - Santos, Marlene S
AU - Saunders, Christina T
AU - Serpa-Neto, Ary
AU - Seymour, Christopher W
AU - Shankar-Hari, Manu
AU - Stronach, Lucy M
AU - Turgeon, Alexis F
AU - Turner, Anne M
AU - van de Veerdonk, Frank L
AU - Zarychanski, Ryan
AU - Green, Cameron
AU - Lewis, Roger J
AU - Angus, Derek C
AU - McArthur, Colin J
AU - Berry, Scott
AU - Derde, Lennie P G
AU - Gordon, Anthony C
AU - Webb, Steve A
AU - Lawler, Patrick R
AU - Writing Committee for the REMAP-CAP Investigators
AU - Jarczak, Dominik
AU - Kluge, Stefan
AU - Nierhaus, Axel
AU - Roedl, Kevin
PY - 2023/1/3
Y1 - 2023/1/3
N2 - IMPORTANCE: The longer-term effects of therapies for the treatment of critically ill patients with COVID-19 are unknown.OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of multiple interventions for critically ill adults with COVID-19 on longer-term outcomes.DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prespecified secondary analysis of an ongoing adaptive platform trial (REMAP-CAP) testing interventions within multiple therapeutic domains in which 4869 critically ill adult patients with COVID-19 were enrolled between March 9, 2020, and June 22, 2021, from 197 sites in 14 countries. The final 180-day follow-up was completed on March 2, 2022.INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive 1 or more interventions within 6 treatment domains: immune modulators (n = 2274), convalescent plasma (n = 2011), antiplatelet therapy (n = 1557), anticoagulation (n = 1033), antivirals (n = 726), and corticosteroids (n = 401).MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The main outcome was survival through day 180, analyzed using a bayesian piecewise exponential model. A hazard ratio (HR) less than 1 represented improved survival (superiority), while an HR greater than 1 represented worsened survival (harm); futility was represented by a relative improvement less than 20% in outcome, shown by an HR greater than 0.83.RESULTS: Among 4869 randomized patients (mean age, 59.3 years; 1537 [32.1%] women), 4107 (84.3%) had known vital status and 2590 (63.1%) were alive at day 180. IL-6 receptor antagonists had a greater than 99.9% probability of improving 6-month survival (adjusted HR, 0.74 [95% credible interval {CrI}, 0.61-0.90]) and antiplatelet agents had a 95% probability of improving 6-month survival (adjusted HR, 0.85 [95% CrI, 0.71-1.03]) compared with the control, while the probability of trial-defined statistical futility (HR >0.83) was high for therapeutic anticoagulation (99.9%; HR, 1.13 [95% CrI, 0.93-1.42]), convalescent plasma (99.2%; HR, 0.99 [95% CrI, 0.86-1.14]), and lopinavir-ritonavir (96.6%; HR, 1.06 [95% CrI, 0.82-1.38]) and the probabilities of harm from hydroxychloroquine (96.9%; HR, 1.51 [95% CrI, 0.98-2.29]) and the combination of lopinavir-ritonavir and hydroxychloroquine (96.8%; HR, 1.61 [95% CrI, 0.97-2.67]) were high. The corticosteroid domain was stopped early prior to reaching a predefined statistical trigger; there was a 57.1% to 61.6% probability of improving 6-month survival across varying hydrocortisone dosing strategies.CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among critically ill patients with COVID-19 randomized to receive 1 or more therapeutic interventions, treatment with an IL-6 receptor antagonist had a greater than 99.9% probability of improved 180-day mortality compared with patients randomized to the control, and treatment with an antiplatelet had a 95.0% probability of improved 180-day mortality compared with patients randomized to the control. Overall, when considered with previously reported short-term results, the findings indicate that initial in-hospital treatment effects were consistent for most therapies through 6 months.
AB - IMPORTANCE: The longer-term effects of therapies for the treatment of critically ill patients with COVID-19 are unknown.OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of multiple interventions for critically ill adults with COVID-19 on longer-term outcomes.DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prespecified secondary analysis of an ongoing adaptive platform trial (REMAP-CAP) testing interventions within multiple therapeutic domains in which 4869 critically ill adult patients with COVID-19 were enrolled between March 9, 2020, and June 22, 2021, from 197 sites in 14 countries. The final 180-day follow-up was completed on March 2, 2022.INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive 1 or more interventions within 6 treatment domains: immune modulators (n = 2274), convalescent plasma (n = 2011), antiplatelet therapy (n = 1557), anticoagulation (n = 1033), antivirals (n = 726), and corticosteroids (n = 401).MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The main outcome was survival through day 180, analyzed using a bayesian piecewise exponential model. A hazard ratio (HR) less than 1 represented improved survival (superiority), while an HR greater than 1 represented worsened survival (harm); futility was represented by a relative improvement less than 20% in outcome, shown by an HR greater than 0.83.RESULTS: Among 4869 randomized patients (mean age, 59.3 years; 1537 [32.1%] women), 4107 (84.3%) had known vital status and 2590 (63.1%) were alive at day 180. IL-6 receptor antagonists had a greater than 99.9% probability of improving 6-month survival (adjusted HR, 0.74 [95% credible interval {CrI}, 0.61-0.90]) and antiplatelet agents had a 95% probability of improving 6-month survival (adjusted HR, 0.85 [95% CrI, 0.71-1.03]) compared with the control, while the probability of trial-defined statistical futility (HR >0.83) was high for therapeutic anticoagulation (99.9%; HR, 1.13 [95% CrI, 0.93-1.42]), convalescent plasma (99.2%; HR, 0.99 [95% CrI, 0.86-1.14]), and lopinavir-ritonavir (96.6%; HR, 1.06 [95% CrI, 0.82-1.38]) and the probabilities of harm from hydroxychloroquine (96.9%; HR, 1.51 [95% CrI, 0.98-2.29]) and the combination of lopinavir-ritonavir and hydroxychloroquine (96.8%; HR, 1.61 [95% CrI, 0.97-2.67]) were high. The corticosteroid domain was stopped early prior to reaching a predefined statistical trigger; there was a 57.1% to 61.6% probability of improving 6-month survival across varying hydrocortisone dosing strategies.CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among critically ill patients with COVID-19 randomized to receive 1 or more therapeutic interventions, treatment with an IL-6 receptor antagonist had a greater than 99.9% probability of improved 180-day mortality compared with patients randomized to the control, and treatment with an antiplatelet had a 95.0% probability of improved 180-day mortality compared with patients randomized to the control. Overall, when considered with previously reported short-term results, the findings indicate that initial in-hospital treatment effects were consistent for most therapies through 6 months.
KW - Adult
KW - Humans
KW - Female
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Male
KW - COVID-19
KW - Lopinavir/therapeutic use
KW - Ritonavir/therapeutic use
KW - Follow-Up Studies
KW - Hydroxychloroquine/therapeutic use
KW - SARS-CoV-2
KW - Critical Illness/therapy
KW - Bayes Theorem
KW - COVID-19 Serotherapy
KW - Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use
KW - Anticoagulants/adverse effects
KW - Receptors, Interleukin-6
U2 - 10.1001/jama.2022.23257
DO - 10.1001/jama.2022.23257
M3 - SCORING: Journal article
C2 - 36525245
VL - 329
SP - 39
EP - 51
JO - JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC
JF - JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC
SN - 0098-7484
IS - 1
ER -