Locked vs. unlocked plate osteosynthesis of the proximal humerus - a biomechanical study.

Standard

Locked vs. unlocked plate osteosynthesis of the proximal humerus - a biomechanical study. / Seide, K; Triebe, J; Faschingbauer, M; Schulz, A P; Püschel, Klaus; Mehrtens, G; Jürgens, Ch.

In: CLIN BIOMECH, Vol. 22, No. 2, 2, 2007, p. 176-182.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Seide, K, Triebe, J, Faschingbauer, M, Schulz, AP, Püschel, K, Mehrtens, G & Jürgens, C 2007, 'Locked vs. unlocked plate osteosynthesis of the proximal humerus - a biomechanical study.', CLIN BIOMECH, vol. 22, no. 2, 2, pp. 176-182. <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17134800?dopt=Citation>

APA

Seide, K., Triebe, J., Faschingbauer, M., Schulz, A. P., Püschel, K., Mehrtens, G., & Jürgens, C. (2007). Locked vs. unlocked plate osteosynthesis of the proximal humerus - a biomechanical study. CLIN BIOMECH, 22(2), 176-182. [2]. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17134800?dopt=Citation

Vancouver

Seide K, Triebe J, Faschingbauer M, Schulz AP, Püschel K, Mehrtens G et al. Locked vs. unlocked plate osteosynthesis of the proximal humerus - a biomechanical study. CLIN BIOMECH. 2007;22(2):176-182. 2.

Bibtex

@article{18774d9d80a74988b95a2ac092e366d7,
title = "Locked vs. unlocked plate osteosynthesis of the proximal humerus - a biomechanical study.",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Locked plates (internal fixators) have been found to be an optimal method for the fixation in proximal humeral fractures. In a biomechanical cadaver study the difference between locked and non-locked osteosyntheses was investigated. METHODS: Paired humeri were harvested, bone density measured. Locked internal fixators were mounted on one specimen; identical plate-screw-systems without locking mechanism applied to the contralateral specimen for comparison. After that, a transverse subcapital osteotomy was performed. With 7 pairs of humeri static tests with increasing axial loads and with 5 pairs dynamic tests with 10 N preload and 80 N maximal axial load for up to 1 million cycles were performed. RESULTS: In the static experiments the elastic stiffness of the construct was 74% higher in the locked group (median 80 N/mm, quartile range 77-86 N/mm) compared with the non-locked group (46 N/mm, 35.5-56.5 N/mm). The difference was statistically significant (Wilcoxon test for paired samples, P",
author = "K Seide and J Triebe and M Faschingbauer and Schulz, {A P} and Klaus P{\"u}schel and G Mehrtens and Ch J{\"u}rgens",
year = "2007",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "22",
pages = "176--182",
journal = "CLIN BIOMECH",
issn = "0268-0033",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Locked vs. unlocked plate osteosynthesis of the proximal humerus - a biomechanical study.

AU - Seide, K

AU - Triebe, J

AU - Faschingbauer, M

AU - Schulz, A P

AU - Püschel, Klaus

AU - Mehrtens, G

AU - Jürgens, Ch

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - BACKGROUND: Locked plates (internal fixators) have been found to be an optimal method for the fixation in proximal humeral fractures. In a biomechanical cadaver study the difference between locked and non-locked osteosyntheses was investigated. METHODS: Paired humeri were harvested, bone density measured. Locked internal fixators were mounted on one specimen; identical plate-screw-systems without locking mechanism applied to the contralateral specimen for comparison. After that, a transverse subcapital osteotomy was performed. With 7 pairs of humeri static tests with increasing axial loads and with 5 pairs dynamic tests with 10 N preload and 80 N maximal axial load for up to 1 million cycles were performed. RESULTS: In the static experiments the elastic stiffness of the construct was 74% higher in the locked group (median 80 N/mm, quartile range 77-86 N/mm) compared with the non-locked group (46 N/mm, 35.5-56.5 N/mm). The difference was statistically significant (Wilcoxon test for paired samples, P

AB - BACKGROUND: Locked plates (internal fixators) have been found to be an optimal method for the fixation in proximal humeral fractures. In a biomechanical cadaver study the difference between locked and non-locked osteosyntheses was investigated. METHODS: Paired humeri were harvested, bone density measured. Locked internal fixators were mounted on one specimen; identical plate-screw-systems without locking mechanism applied to the contralateral specimen for comparison. After that, a transverse subcapital osteotomy was performed. With 7 pairs of humeri static tests with increasing axial loads and with 5 pairs dynamic tests with 10 N preload and 80 N maximal axial load for up to 1 million cycles were performed. RESULTS: In the static experiments the elastic stiffness of the construct was 74% higher in the locked group (median 80 N/mm, quartile range 77-86 N/mm) compared with the non-locked group (46 N/mm, 35.5-56.5 N/mm). The difference was statistically significant (Wilcoxon test for paired samples, P

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

VL - 22

SP - 176

EP - 182

JO - CLIN BIOMECH

JF - CLIN BIOMECH

SN - 0268-0033

IS - 2

M1 - 2

ER -