Lipoprotein lipase-facilitated uptake of LDL is mediated by the LDL receptor.

Standard

Lipoprotein lipase-facilitated uptake of LDL is mediated by the LDL receptor. / Loeffler, Bettina; Heeren, Jörg; Blaeser, Mareike; Radner, Herbert; Kayser, Daniel; Aydin, Birol; Merkel, Martin.

In: J LIPID RES, Vol. 48, No. 2, 2, 2007, p. 288-298.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Loeffler, B, Heeren, J, Blaeser, M, Radner, H, Kayser, D, Aydin, B & Merkel, M 2007, 'Lipoprotein lipase-facilitated uptake of LDL is mediated by the LDL receptor.', J LIPID RES, vol. 48, no. 2, 2, pp. 288-298. <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17090659?dopt=Citation>

APA

Loeffler, B., Heeren, J., Blaeser, M., Radner, H., Kayser, D., Aydin, B., & Merkel, M. (2007). Lipoprotein lipase-facilitated uptake of LDL is mediated by the LDL receptor. J LIPID RES, 48(2), 288-298. [2]. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17090659?dopt=Citation

Vancouver

Loeffler B, Heeren J, Blaeser M, Radner H, Kayser D, Aydin B et al. Lipoprotein lipase-facilitated uptake of LDL is mediated by the LDL receptor. J LIPID RES. 2007;48(2):288-298. 2.

Bibtex

@article{628d5a869ab947d6835b4f108b7fcb17,
title = "Lipoprotein lipase-facilitated uptake of LDL is mediated by the LDL receptor.",
abstract = "LPL mediates the uptake of lipoproteins into different cell types independent of its catalytic activity. The mechanism of this process and its physiological relevance are not clear. Taking into account the importance of the endothelial barrier for lipoprotein uptake, in vitro studies with primary aortic endothelial cells from wild-type and low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR)-deficient (LDLR(-/-)) mice were performed. Addition of LPL almost doubled the uptake of LDL into wild-type cells. However, there was virtually no LPL-mediated change of LDL uptake into LDLR(-/-) cells. Upregulation of LDLR by lipoprotein-deficient serum/lovastatin in wild-type cells resulted in a 7-fold increase of LPL-mediated LDL uptake. Uptake of chylomicron remnants was not affected by LDLR expression. In proteoglycan-deficient cells, LPL did not increase the uptake of lipoproteins. The physiological relevance of this pathway was studied in mice that were both LDLR(-/-) and transgenic for catalytically inactive LPL in muscle. In the presence of LDLR, inactive LPL reduced LDL cholesterol significantly (13-24%). In the absence of LDLR, LDL cholesterol was not affected by transgenic LPL. Metabolic studies showed that in the presence of LDLR, LPL increased the muscular uptake of LDL by 77%. In the absence of LDLR, transgenic LPL did not augment LDL uptake. Chylomicron uptake was not affected by the LDLR genotype. We conclude that LPL-mediated cellular uptake of LDL, but not of chylomicrons, is dependent on the presence of both LDLR and proteoglycans.",
author = "Bettina Loeffler and J{\"o}rg Heeren and Mareike Blaeser and Herbert Radner and Daniel Kayser and Birol Aydin and Martin Merkel",
year = "2007",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "48",
pages = "288--298",
journal = "J LIPID RES",
issn = "0022-2275",
publisher = "American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Inc.",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lipoprotein lipase-facilitated uptake of LDL is mediated by the LDL receptor.

AU - Loeffler, Bettina

AU - Heeren, Jörg

AU - Blaeser, Mareike

AU - Radner, Herbert

AU - Kayser, Daniel

AU - Aydin, Birol

AU - Merkel, Martin

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - LPL mediates the uptake of lipoproteins into different cell types independent of its catalytic activity. The mechanism of this process and its physiological relevance are not clear. Taking into account the importance of the endothelial barrier for lipoprotein uptake, in vitro studies with primary aortic endothelial cells from wild-type and low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR)-deficient (LDLR(-/-)) mice were performed. Addition of LPL almost doubled the uptake of LDL into wild-type cells. However, there was virtually no LPL-mediated change of LDL uptake into LDLR(-/-) cells. Upregulation of LDLR by lipoprotein-deficient serum/lovastatin in wild-type cells resulted in a 7-fold increase of LPL-mediated LDL uptake. Uptake of chylomicron remnants was not affected by LDLR expression. In proteoglycan-deficient cells, LPL did not increase the uptake of lipoproteins. The physiological relevance of this pathway was studied in mice that were both LDLR(-/-) and transgenic for catalytically inactive LPL in muscle. In the presence of LDLR, inactive LPL reduced LDL cholesterol significantly (13-24%). In the absence of LDLR, LDL cholesterol was not affected by transgenic LPL. Metabolic studies showed that in the presence of LDLR, LPL increased the muscular uptake of LDL by 77%. In the absence of LDLR, transgenic LPL did not augment LDL uptake. Chylomicron uptake was not affected by the LDLR genotype. We conclude that LPL-mediated cellular uptake of LDL, but not of chylomicrons, is dependent on the presence of both LDLR and proteoglycans.

AB - LPL mediates the uptake of lipoproteins into different cell types independent of its catalytic activity. The mechanism of this process and its physiological relevance are not clear. Taking into account the importance of the endothelial barrier for lipoprotein uptake, in vitro studies with primary aortic endothelial cells from wild-type and low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR)-deficient (LDLR(-/-)) mice were performed. Addition of LPL almost doubled the uptake of LDL into wild-type cells. However, there was virtually no LPL-mediated change of LDL uptake into LDLR(-/-) cells. Upregulation of LDLR by lipoprotein-deficient serum/lovastatin in wild-type cells resulted in a 7-fold increase of LPL-mediated LDL uptake. Uptake of chylomicron remnants was not affected by LDLR expression. In proteoglycan-deficient cells, LPL did not increase the uptake of lipoproteins. The physiological relevance of this pathway was studied in mice that were both LDLR(-/-) and transgenic for catalytically inactive LPL in muscle. In the presence of LDLR, inactive LPL reduced LDL cholesterol significantly (13-24%). In the absence of LDLR, LDL cholesterol was not affected by transgenic LPL. Metabolic studies showed that in the presence of LDLR, LPL increased the muscular uptake of LDL by 77%. In the absence of LDLR, transgenic LPL did not augment LDL uptake. Chylomicron uptake was not affected by the LDLR genotype. We conclude that LPL-mediated cellular uptake of LDL, but not of chylomicrons, is dependent on the presence of both LDLR and proteoglycans.

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

VL - 48

SP - 288

EP - 298

JO - J LIPID RES

JF - J LIPID RES

SN - 0022-2275

IS - 2

M1 - 2

ER -