Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction Is Not Associated With Pulmonary Edema in Septic Patients. A Prospective Observational Cohort Study

Standard

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{9330105325434394a6a0641602dfab2b,
title = "Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction Is Not Associated With Pulmonary Edema in Septic Patients. A Prospective Observational Cohort Study",
abstract = "Purpose: We aimed to investigate whether left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) is associated with pulmonary edema in septic patients.Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study in adult septic patients between October 2018 and May 2019. We performed repeated echocardiography and lung ultrasound examinations within the first 7 days after diagnosis of sepsis. We defined LVDD according to the 2016 recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography and-for sensitivity analysis-according to an algorithm which has been validated in septic patients. We quantified pulmonary edema using the lung ultrasound score (LUSS), counting B-lines in four intercostal spaces.Results: We included 54 patients. LVDD was present in 51 (42%) of 122 echocardiography examinations. The mean (±SD) LUSS was 11 ± 6. There was no clinically meaningful association of LVDD with LUSS (B = 0.55 [95%CI: -1.38; 2.47]; p = 0.571). Pneumonia was significantly associated with higher LUSS (B = 4.42 [95%CI: 0.38; 8.5]; p = 0.033).Conclusion: The lack of a clinically meaningful association of LVDD with LUSS suggests that LVDD is not a major contributor to pulmonary edema in septic patients.Trial Registration: NCT03768752, ClinicalTrials.gov, November 30th, 2018 - retrospectively registered.",
author = "Ursula Kahl and Leah Schirren and Yuanyuan Yu and Susanne Lezius and Marlene Fischer and Maja Menke and Christoph Sinning and Axel Nierhaus and Maren Vens and Christian Z{\"o}llner and Stefan Kluge and Goepfert, {Matthias S} and Katharina Roeher",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2022 Kahl, Schirren, Yu, Lezius, Fischer, Menke, Sinning, Nierhaus, Vens, Z{\"o}llner, Kluge, Goepfert and Roeher.",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.3389/fcvm.2022.900850",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
journal = "FRONT CARDIOVASC MED",
issn = "2297-055X",
publisher = "Frontiers Media S. A.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction Is Not Associated With Pulmonary Edema in Septic Patients. A Prospective Observational Cohort Study

AU - Kahl, Ursula

AU - Schirren, Leah

AU - Yu, Yuanyuan

AU - Lezius, Susanne

AU - Fischer, Marlene

AU - Menke, Maja

AU - Sinning, Christoph

AU - Nierhaus, Axel

AU - Vens, Maren

AU - Zöllner, Christian

AU - Kluge, Stefan

AU - Goepfert, Matthias S

AU - Roeher, Katharina

N1 - Copyright © 2022 Kahl, Schirren, Yu, Lezius, Fischer, Menke, Sinning, Nierhaus, Vens, Zöllner, Kluge, Goepfert and Roeher.

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Purpose: We aimed to investigate whether left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) is associated with pulmonary edema in septic patients.Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study in adult septic patients between October 2018 and May 2019. We performed repeated echocardiography and lung ultrasound examinations within the first 7 days after diagnosis of sepsis. We defined LVDD according to the 2016 recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography and-for sensitivity analysis-according to an algorithm which has been validated in septic patients. We quantified pulmonary edema using the lung ultrasound score (LUSS), counting B-lines in four intercostal spaces.Results: We included 54 patients. LVDD was present in 51 (42%) of 122 echocardiography examinations. The mean (±SD) LUSS was 11 ± 6. There was no clinically meaningful association of LVDD with LUSS (B = 0.55 [95%CI: -1.38; 2.47]; p = 0.571). Pneumonia was significantly associated with higher LUSS (B = 4.42 [95%CI: 0.38; 8.5]; p = 0.033).Conclusion: The lack of a clinically meaningful association of LVDD with LUSS suggests that LVDD is not a major contributor to pulmonary edema in septic patients.Trial Registration: NCT03768752, ClinicalTrials.gov, November 30th, 2018 - retrospectively registered.

AB - Purpose: We aimed to investigate whether left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) is associated with pulmonary edema in septic patients.Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study in adult septic patients between October 2018 and May 2019. We performed repeated echocardiography and lung ultrasound examinations within the first 7 days after diagnosis of sepsis. We defined LVDD according to the 2016 recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography and-for sensitivity analysis-according to an algorithm which has been validated in septic patients. We quantified pulmonary edema using the lung ultrasound score (LUSS), counting B-lines in four intercostal spaces.Results: We included 54 patients. LVDD was present in 51 (42%) of 122 echocardiography examinations. The mean (±SD) LUSS was 11 ± 6. There was no clinically meaningful association of LVDD with LUSS (B = 0.55 [95%CI: -1.38; 2.47]; p = 0.571). Pneumonia was significantly associated with higher LUSS (B = 4.42 [95%CI: 0.38; 8.5]; p = 0.033).Conclusion: The lack of a clinically meaningful association of LVDD with LUSS suggests that LVDD is not a major contributor to pulmonary edema in septic patients.Trial Registration: NCT03768752, ClinicalTrials.gov, November 30th, 2018 - retrospectively registered.

U2 - 10.3389/fcvm.2022.900850

DO - 10.3389/fcvm.2022.900850

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 35845063

VL - 9

JO - FRONT CARDIOVASC MED

JF - FRONT CARDIOVASC MED

SN - 2297-055X

M1 - 900850

ER -