Research ExplorerPublicationsLaboratory evaluation of toothbrush/toothpaste abrasion resi...

Laboratory evaluation of toothbrush/toothpaste abrasion resistance after smooth enamel surface sealing

Standard

Laboratory evaluation of toothbrush/toothpaste abrasion resistance after smooth enamel surface sealing. / Korbmacher-Steiner, Heike M; Schilling, Arndt F; Huck, Lothar G; Kahl-Nieke, Bärbel; Amling, Michael.

In: CLIN ORAL INVEST, Vol. 17, No. 3, 01.04.2013, p. 765-74.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journal › SCORING: Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Korbmacher-Steiner, HM, Schilling, AF, Huck, LG, Kahl-Nieke, B & Amling, M 2013, 'Laboratory evaluation of toothbrush/toothpaste abrasion resistance after smooth enamel surface sealing', CLIN ORAL INVEST, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 765-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0771-8

APA

Korbmacher-Steiner, H. M., Schilling, A. F., Huck, L. G., Kahl-Nieke, B., & Amling, M. (2013). Laboratory evaluation of toothbrush/toothpaste abrasion resistance after smooth enamel surface sealing. CLIN ORAL INVEST, 17(3), 765-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0771-8

Vancouver

Korbmacher-Steiner HM, Schilling AF, Huck LG, Kahl-Nieke B, Amling M. Laboratory evaluation of toothbrush/toothpaste abrasion resistance after smooth enamel surface sealing. CLIN ORAL INVEST. 2013 Apr 1;17(3):765-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0771-8

Bibtex

@article{2992f10080ee4f05b76ca7c995ccd7d3,
title = "Laboratory evaluation of toothbrush/toothpaste abrasion resistance after smooth enamel surface sealing",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: The use of dental sealants has been extended to smooth enamel surfaces. The present study was conducted to test the in vitro performance of four sealants with different characteristics (highly and lowly filled, self-etching features).MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty human teeth (lower incisors and premolars) were randomly divided into following sealant test groups: ProSeal(TM), LightBond(TM), OrthoSolo(TM), and Seal&Protect({\textregistered}). Twenty untreated teeth served as a control group. Tooth brushing was conducted for a period of time simulating 12, 18, and 24 months. During the toothbrush abrasion protocol, the specimens were subjected to thermal and acidic challenge. Sealant thickness was determined with μCT imaging, and qualitative and quantitative surface effects were investigated using stereo microscopy and raster electron microscopy, respectively. Data were subjected to t test or Kruskal-Wallis/Mann-Whitney tests (alpha, 5%).RESULTS: The wear behavior and film integrity of highly filled sealants were superior to lowly filled sealants. Even after 1 year of tooth brushing, significant surface deterioration with deleterious loss of enamel and discoloration was observed in all tested materials (χ(2) = 15.349; P = 0.004). The size of the observed defects increased over time.CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the application of sealants on smooth enamel surfaces should be limited to special indications, and their usefulness has to be revisited.CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Based on the results of this in vitro study, the general overall application of enamel sealants needs to be questioned.",
keywords = "Acrylic Resins, Dental Enamel, Dental Stress Analysis, Dentin-Bonding Agents, Humans, Microscopy, Electron, Pit and Fissure Sealants, Resin Cements, Statistics, Nonparametric, Surface Properties, Tooth Abrasion, Toothbrushing, Toothpastes, X-Ray Microtomography",
author = "Korbmacher-Steiner, {Heike M} and Schilling, {Arndt F} and Huck, {Lothar G} and B{\"a}rbel Kahl-Nieke and Michael Amling",
year = "2013",
month = apr,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00784-012-0771-8",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "765--74",
journal = "CLIN ORAL INVEST",
issn = "1432-6981",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Laboratory evaluation of toothbrush/toothpaste abrasion resistance after smooth enamel surface sealing

AU - Korbmacher-Steiner, Heike M

AU - Schilling, Arndt F

AU - Huck, Lothar G

AU - Kahl-Nieke, Bärbel

AU - Amling, Michael

PY - 2013/4/1

Y1 - 2013/4/1

N2 - OBJECTIVES: The use of dental sealants has been extended to smooth enamel surfaces. The present study was conducted to test the in vitro performance of four sealants with different characteristics (highly and lowly filled, self-etching features).MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty human teeth (lower incisors and premolars) were randomly divided into following sealant test groups: ProSeal(TM), LightBond(TM), OrthoSolo(TM), and Seal&Protect(®). Twenty untreated teeth served as a control group. Tooth brushing was conducted for a period of time simulating 12, 18, and 24 months. During the toothbrush abrasion protocol, the specimens were subjected to thermal and acidic challenge. Sealant thickness was determined with μCT imaging, and qualitative and quantitative surface effects were investigated using stereo microscopy and raster electron microscopy, respectively. Data were subjected to t test or Kruskal-Wallis/Mann-Whitney tests (alpha, 5%).RESULTS: The wear behavior and film integrity of highly filled sealants were superior to lowly filled sealants. Even after 1 year of tooth brushing, significant surface deterioration with deleterious loss of enamel and discoloration was observed in all tested materials (χ(2) = 15.349; P = 0.004). The size of the observed defects increased over time.CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the application of sealants on smooth enamel surfaces should be limited to special indications, and their usefulness has to be revisited.CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Based on the results of this in vitro study, the general overall application of enamel sealants needs to be questioned.

AB - OBJECTIVES: The use of dental sealants has been extended to smooth enamel surfaces. The present study was conducted to test the in vitro performance of four sealants with different characteristics (highly and lowly filled, self-etching features).MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty human teeth (lower incisors and premolars) were randomly divided into following sealant test groups: ProSeal(TM), LightBond(TM), OrthoSolo(TM), and Seal&Protect(®). Twenty untreated teeth served as a control group. Tooth brushing was conducted for a period of time simulating 12, 18, and 24 months. During the toothbrush abrasion protocol, the specimens were subjected to thermal and acidic challenge. Sealant thickness was determined with μCT imaging, and qualitative and quantitative surface effects were investigated using stereo microscopy and raster electron microscopy, respectively. Data were subjected to t test or Kruskal-Wallis/Mann-Whitney tests (alpha, 5%).RESULTS: The wear behavior and film integrity of highly filled sealants were superior to lowly filled sealants. Even after 1 year of tooth brushing, significant surface deterioration with deleterious loss of enamel and discoloration was observed in all tested materials (χ(2) = 15.349; P = 0.004). The size of the observed defects increased over time.CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the application of sealants on smooth enamel surfaces should be limited to special indications, and their usefulness has to be revisited.CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Based on the results of this in vitro study, the general overall application of enamel sealants needs to be questioned.

KW - Acrylic Resins

KW - Dental Enamel

KW - Dental Stress Analysis

KW - Dentin-Bonding Agents

KW - Humans

KW - Microscopy, Electron

KW - Pit and Fissure Sealants

KW - Resin Cements

KW - Statistics, Nonparametric

KW - Surface Properties

KW - Tooth Abrasion

KW - Toothbrushing

KW - Toothpastes

KW - X-Ray Microtomography

U2 - 10.1007/s00784-012-0771-8

DO - 10.1007/s00784-012-0771-8

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 22752334

VL - 17

SP - 765

EP - 774

JO - CLIN ORAL INVEST

JF - CLIN ORAL INVEST

SN - 1432-6981

IS - 3

ER -