Katheterablation bei Vorhofflimmern: wann bereits klinisch etabliert, wann noch experimentell?

Standard

Katheterablation bei Vorhofflimmern: wann bereits klinisch etabliert, wann noch experimentell? / Willems, Stephan; Hoffmann, Boris; Steven, Daniel; Drewitz, Imke; Servatius, Helge; Müllerleile, Kai; Meinertz, Thomas; Rostock, Thomas.

In: HERZ, Vol. 33, No. 6, 09.2008, p. 402-411.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Review articleResearch

Harvard

Willems, S, Hoffmann, B, Steven, D, Drewitz, I, Servatius, H, Müllerleile, K, Meinertz, T & Rostock, T 2008, 'Katheterablation bei Vorhofflimmern: wann bereits klinisch etabliert, wann noch experimentell?', HERZ, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 402-411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00059-008-3150-0

APA

Willems, S., Hoffmann, B., Steven, D., Drewitz, I., Servatius, H., Müllerleile, K., Meinertz, T., & Rostock, T. (2008). Katheterablation bei Vorhofflimmern: wann bereits klinisch etabliert, wann noch experimentell? HERZ, 33(6), 402-411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00059-008-3150-0

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{8b64a449e15c448289e05b981f8d4d44,
title = "Katheterablation bei Vorhofflimmern: wann bereits klinisch etabliert, wann noch experimentell?",
abstract = "Interventional treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF) has been introduced as a therapeutic option soon after the pulmonary veins (PV) have been discovered as the dominant sources of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). Elimination of PV conduction is the initial goal during catheter ablation in this setting. The success rate after the initial procedure varies between 60% and 85%, with > 80% after subsequent interventions. Supported by the current guidelines, interventional treatment of AF is indicated in case of symptomatic arrhythmias refractory to antiarrhythmic treatment. The introduction of the combined, stepwise approach has been another important breakthrough with regard to the treatment of chronic persistent atrial fibrillation (CAF). This strategy includes the combination of all conventional ablation strategies (pulmonary vein isolation [PVI], defragmentation, linear ablation) with the goal of AF termination by radiofrequency current. The first procedure for CAF treatment is quite frequently also only the first step toward stable sinus rhythm with a favorable outcome after AF termination (> 80% sinus rhythm). In more than half of the patients predominantly atrial arrhythmias other than AF have to be targeted in a second procedure. This approach is currently under clinical investigation and so far not {"}clinically established{"} due to the fact that it is a quite time-consuming and challenging procedure even in experienced centers. Future studies may help to identify predictors for procedure failure (e.g., left atrial size, AF duration, atrial cycle length) in order to improve patient selection. Additionally, it has to be underscored, that in PAF the relatively high recurrence rate after the first procedure still is the subject of further investigations. This aspect might be improved by the introduction of novel strategies (i.e., testing of concealed PV conduction after ablation with adenosine) or technologies (i.e., robotic navigation) for PAF ablation.",
keywords = "Atrial Fibrillation/surgery, Catheter Ablation/methods, Clinical Trials as Topic/trends, Evidence-Based Medicine/trends, Humans, Treatment Outcome",
author = "Stephan Willems and Boris Hoffmann and Daniel Steven and Imke Drewitz and Helge Servatius and Kai M{\"u}llerleile and Thomas Meinertz and Thomas Rostock",
year = "2008",
month = sep,
doi = "10.1007/s00059-008-3150-0",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "33",
pages = "402--411",
journal = "HERZ",
issn = "0340-9937",
publisher = "Urban und Vogel",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Katheterablation bei Vorhofflimmern: wann bereits klinisch etabliert, wann noch experimentell?

AU - Willems, Stephan

AU - Hoffmann, Boris

AU - Steven, Daniel

AU - Drewitz, Imke

AU - Servatius, Helge

AU - Müllerleile, Kai

AU - Meinertz, Thomas

AU - Rostock, Thomas

PY - 2008/9

Y1 - 2008/9

N2 - Interventional treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF) has been introduced as a therapeutic option soon after the pulmonary veins (PV) have been discovered as the dominant sources of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). Elimination of PV conduction is the initial goal during catheter ablation in this setting. The success rate after the initial procedure varies between 60% and 85%, with > 80% after subsequent interventions. Supported by the current guidelines, interventional treatment of AF is indicated in case of symptomatic arrhythmias refractory to antiarrhythmic treatment. The introduction of the combined, stepwise approach has been another important breakthrough with regard to the treatment of chronic persistent atrial fibrillation (CAF). This strategy includes the combination of all conventional ablation strategies (pulmonary vein isolation [PVI], defragmentation, linear ablation) with the goal of AF termination by radiofrequency current. The first procedure for CAF treatment is quite frequently also only the first step toward stable sinus rhythm with a favorable outcome after AF termination (> 80% sinus rhythm). In more than half of the patients predominantly atrial arrhythmias other than AF have to be targeted in a second procedure. This approach is currently under clinical investigation and so far not "clinically established" due to the fact that it is a quite time-consuming and challenging procedure even in experienced centers. Future studies may help to identify predictors for procedure failure (e.g., left atrial size, AF duration, atrial cycle length) in order to improve patient selection. Additionally, it has to be underscored, that in PAF the relatively high recurrence rate after the first procedure still is the subject of further investigations. This aspect might be improved by the introduction of novel strategies (i.e., testing of concealed PV conduction after ablation with adenosine) or technologies (i.e., robotic navigation) for PAF ablation.

AB - Interventional treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF) has been introduced as a therapeutic option soon after the pulmonary veins (PV) have been discovered as the dominant sources of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). Elimination of PV conduction is the initial goal during catheter ablation in this setting. The success rate after the initial procedure varies between 60% and 85%, with > 80% after subsequent interventions. Supported by the current guidelines, interventional treatment of AF is indicated in case of symptomatic arrhythmias refractory to antiarrhythmic treatment. The introduction of the combined, stepwise approach has been another important breakthrough with regard to the treatment of chronic persistent atrial fibrillation (CAF). This strategy includes the combination of all conventional ablation strategies (pulmonary vein isolation [PVI], defragmentation, linear ablation) with the goal of AF termination by radiofrequency current. The first procedure for CAF treatment is quite frequently also only the first step toward stable sinus rhythm with a favorable outcome after AF termination (> 80% sinus rhythm). In more than half of the patients predominantly atrial arrhythmias other than AF have to be targeted in a second procedure. This approach is currently under clinical investigation and so far not "clinically established" due to the fact that it is a quite time-consuming and challenging procedure even in experienced centers. Future studies may help to identify predictors for procedure failure (e.g., left atrial size, AF duration, atrial cycle length) in order to improve patient selection. Additionally, it has to be underscored, that in PAF the relatively high recurrence rate after the first procedure still is the subject of further investigations. This aspect might be improved by the introduction of novel strategies (i.e., testing of concealed PV conduction after ablation with adenosine) or technologies (i.e., robotic navigation) for PAF ablation.

KW - Atrial Fibrillation/surgery

KW - Catheter Ablation/methods

KW - Clinical Trials as Topic/trends

KW - Evidence-Based Medicine/trends

KW - Humans

KW - Treatment Outcome

U2 - 10.1007/s00059-008-3150-0

DO - 10.1007/s00059-008-3150-0

M3 - SCORING: Review

C2 - 19156375

VL - 33

SP - 402

EP - 411

JO - HERZ

JF - HERZ

SN - 0340-9937

IS - 6

ER -