Is a self-rated instrument appropriate to assess mentalization in patients with mental disorders? Development and first validation of the mentalization questionnaire (MZQ).

Standard

Is a self-rated instrument appropriate to assess mentalization in patients with mental disorders? Development and first validation of the mentalization questionnaire (MZQ). / Hausberg, Maria; Schulz, Holger; Piegler, Theo; Happach, Claas Gerhard; Klöpper, Michael; Brütt, Anna Levke; Sammet, Isa; Andreas, Sylke.

In: PSYCHOTHER RES, Vol. 22, No. 6, 6, 2012, p. 699-709.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{382cf53a08ad47b3a9adba0645675d7e,
title = "Is a self-rated instrument appropriate to assess mentalization in patients with mental disorders? Development and first validation of the mentalization questionnaire (MZQ).",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a self-rating scale for a differentiated assessment of mentalization. A pool of 40 items was developed and evaluated on n=434 inpatients with mental disorders at three time points. Symptom severity, self-injuring behavior, suicidal tendency and attachment style were also assessed. A varimax-rotated factor analysis supported the extraction of four factors. The model fit was checked by confirmatory factor analysis. Internal consistency of the mentalization questionnaire (MZQ) was .81. The relation between symptom severity and MZQ scores was found to be significant, and significant group differences were found between patients displaying self-injuring behavior and those who did not as well as between patients with and without suicide attempts. The MZQ can be considered as a practicable self-rated instrument with acceptable reliability and sufficient validity to assess at least aspects of mentalization in patients with mental disorders.",
keywords = "Adult, Humans, Male, Aged, Female, Middle Aged, Adolescent, Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Mental Disorders/*diagnosis, Self Report, Self-Assessment, *Theory of Mind, Psychometrics/instrumentation, Adult, Humans, Male, Aged, Female, Middle Aged, Adolescent, Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Mental Disorders/*diagnosis, Self Report, Self-Assessment, *Theory of Mind, Psychometrics/instrumentation",
author = "Maria Hausberg and Holger Schulz and Theo Piegler and Happach, {Claas Gerhard} and Michael Kl{\"o}pper and Br{\"u}tt, {Anna Levke} and Isa Sammet and Sylke Andreas",
year = "2012",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "699--709",
journal = "PSYCHOTHER RES",
issn = "1050-3307",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is a self-rated instrument appropriate to assess mentalization in patients with mental disorders? Development and first validation of the mentalization questionnaire (MZQ).

AU - Hausberg, Maria

AU - Schulz, Holger

AU - Piegler, Theo

AU - Happach, Claas Gerhard

AU - Klöpper, Michael

AU - Brütt, Anna Levke

AU - Sammet, Isa

AU - Andreas, Sylke

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a self-rating scale for a differentiated assessment of mentalization. A pool of 40 items was developed and evaluated on n=434 inpatients with mental disorders at three time points. Symptom severity, self-injuring behavior, suicidal tendency and attachment style were also assessed. A varimax-rotated factor analysis supported the extraction of four factors. The model fit was checked by confirmatory factor analysis. Internal consistency of the mentalization questionnaire (MZQ) was .81. The relation between symptom severity and MZQ scores was found to be significant, and significant group differences were found between patients displaying self-injuring behavior and those who did not as well as between patients with and without suicide attempts. The MZQ can be considered as a practicable self-rated instrument with acceptable reliability and sufficient validity to assess at least aspects of mentalization in patients with mental disorders.

AB - The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a self-rating scale for a differentiated assessment of mentalization. A pool of 40 items was developed and evaluated on n=434 inpatients with mental disorders at three time points. Symptom severity, self-injuring behavior, suicidal tendency and attachment style were also assessed. A varimax-rotated factor analysis supported the extraction of four factors. The model fit was checked by confirmatory factor analysis. Internal consistency of the mentalization questionnaire (MZQ) was .81. The relation between symptom severity and MZQ scores was found to be significant, and significant group differences were found between patients displaying self-injuring behavior and those who did not as well as between patients with and without suicide attempts. The MZQ can be considered as a practicable self-rated instrument with acceptable reliability and sufficient validity to assess at least aspects of mentalization in patients with mental disorders.

KW - Adult

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Aged

KW - Female

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Adolescent

KW - Questionnaires

KW - Reproducibility of Results

KW - Factor Analysis, Statistical

KW - Mental Disorders/diagnosis

KW - Self Report

KW - Self-Assessment

KW - Theory of Mind

KW - Psychometrics/instrumentation

KW - Adult

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Aged

KW - Female

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Adolescent

KW - Questionnaires

KW - Reproducibility of Results

KW - Factor Analysis, Statistical

KW - Mental Disorders/diagnosis

KW - Self Report

KW - Self-Assessment

KW - Theory of Mind

KW - Psychometrics/instrumentation

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

VL - 22

SP - 699

EP - 709

JO - PSYCHOTHER RES

JF - PSYCHOTHER RES

SN - 1050-3307

IS - 6

M1 - 6

ER -