Intraindividual evaluation of the influence of iterative reconstruction and filter kernel on subjective and objective image quality in computed tomography of the brain
Standard
Intraindividual evaluation of the influence of iterative reconstruction and filter kernel on subjective and objective image quality in computed tomography of the brain. / Buhk, J H; Laqmani, A; von Schultzendorff, H C; Hammerle, D; Sehner, S; Adam, G; Fiehler, J; Nagel, H D; Regier, M.
In: ROFO-FORTSCHR RONTG, Vol. 185, No. 8, 08.2013, p. 741-8.Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journal › SCORING: Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Intraindividual evaluation of the influence of iterative reconstruction and filter kernel on subjective and objective image quality in computed tomography of the brain
AU - Buhk, J H
AU - Laqmani, A
AU - von Schultzendorff, H C
AU - Hammerle, D
AU - Sehner, S
AU - Adam, G
AU - Fiehler, J
AU - Nagel, H D
AU - Regier, M
N1 - © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
PY - 2013/8
Y1 - 2013/8
N2 - OBJECTIVES: To intraindividually evaluate the potential of 4th generation iterative reconstruction (IR) on brain CT with regard to subjective and objective image quality.METHODS: 31 consecutive raw data sets of clinical routine native sequential brain CT scans were reconstructed with IR level 0 (= filtered back projection), 1, 3 and 4; 3 different brain filter kernels (smooth/standard/sharp) were applied respectively. Five independent radiologists with different levels of experience performed subjective image rating. Detailed ROI analysis of image contrast and noise was performed. Statistical analysis was carried out by applying a random intercept model.RESULTS: Subjective scores for the smooth and the standard kernels were best at low IR levels, but both, in particular the smooth kernel, scored inferior with an increasing IR level. The sharp kernel scored lowest at IR 0, while the scores substantially increased at high IR levels, reaching significantly best scores at IR 4. Objective measurements revealed an overall increase in contrast-to-noise ratio at higher IR levels, which was highest when applying the soft filter kernel. The absolute grey-white contrast decreased with an increasing IR level and was highest when applying the sharp filter kernel. All subjective effects were independent of the raters' experience and the patients' age and sex.CONCLUSION: Different combinations of IR level and filter kernel substantially influence subjective and objective image quality of brain CT.
AB - OBJECTIVES: To intraindividually evaluate the potential of 4th generation iterative reconstruction (IR) on brain CT with regard to subjective and objective image quality.METHODS: 31 consecutive raw data sets of clinical routine native sequential brain CT scans were reconstructed with IR level 0 (= filtered back projection), 1, 3 and 4; 3 different brain filter kernels (smooth/standard/sharp) were applied respectively. Five independent radiologists with different levels of experience performed subjective image rating. Detailed ROI analysis of image contrast and noise was performed. Statistical analysis was carried out by applying a random intercept model.RESULTS: Subjective scores for the smooth and the standard kernels were best at low IR levels, but both, in particular the smooth kernel, scored inferior with an increasing IR level. The sharp kernel scored lowest at IR 0, while the scores substantially increased at high IR levels, reaching significantly best scores at IR 4. Objective measurements revealed an overall increase in contrast-to-noise ratio at higher IR levels, which was highest when applying the soft filter kernel. The absolute grey-white contrast decreased with an increasing IR level and was highest when applying the sharp filter kernel. All subjective effects were independent of the raters' experience and the patients' age and sex.CONCLUSION: Different combinations of IR level and filter kernel substantially influence subjective and objective image quality of brain CT.
KW - Adult
KW - Aged
KW - Aged, 80 and over
KW - Artifacts
KW - Basal Ganglia Cerebrovascular Disease
KW - Brain
KW - Brain Diseases
KW - Brain Neoplasms
KW - Cerebral Cortex
KW - Cerebral Infarction
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Image Enhancement
KW - Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
KW - Intracranial Hemorrhages
KW - Male
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Observer Variation
KW - Radiology Information Systems
KW - Reference Values
KW - Sensitivity and Specificity
KW - Skull Base
KW - Stroke
KW - Young Adult
U2 - 10.1055/s-0033-1335937
DO - 10.1055/s-0033-1335937
M3 - SCORING: Journal article
C2 - 23900941
VL - 185
SP - 741
EP - 748
JO - ROFO-FORTSCHR RONTG
JF - ROFO-FORTSCHR RONTG
SN - 1438-9029
IS - 8
ER -