International registry on the use of the CytoSorb® adsorber in ICU patients: Study protocol and preliminary results

Standard

International registry on the use of the CytoSorb® adsorber in ICU patients: Study protocol and preliminary results. / Friesecke, Sigrun; Träger, K; Schittek, G A; Molnar, Zsolt; Bach, F; Kogelmann, Klaus; Bogdanski, R; Weyland, Andreas; Nierhaus, A; Nestler, F; Olboeter, D; Tomescu, D; Jacob, D; Haake, H; Grigoryev, E; Nitsch, M; Baumann, Arnd; Quintel, M; Schott, Matthias; Kielstein, J T; Meier-Hellmann, Andreas; Born, F; Schumacher, U; Singer, M; Kellum, J; Brunkhorst, Frank M.

In: MED KLIN-INTENSIVMED, Vol. 114, No. 8, 11.2019, p. 699-707.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Review articleResearch

Harvard

Friesecke, S, Träger, K, Schittek, GA, Molnar, Z, Bach, F, Kogelmann, K, Bogdanski, R, Weyland, A, Nierhaus, A, Nestler, F, Olboeter, D, Tomescu, D, Jacob, D, Haake, H, Grigoryev, E, Nitsch, M, Baumann, A, Quintel, M, Schott, M, Kielstein, JT, Meier-Hellmann, A, Born, F, Schumacher, U, Singer, M, Kellum, J & Brunkhorst, FM 2019, 'International registry on the use of the CytoSorb® adsorber in ICU patients: Study protocol and preliminary results', MED KLIN-INTENSIVMED, vol. 114, no. 8, pp. 699-707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00063-017-0342-5

APA

Friesecke, S., Träger, K., Schittek, G. A., Molnar, Z., Bach, F., Kogelmann, K., Bogdanski, R., Weyland, A., Nierhaus, A., Nestler, F., Olboeter, D., Tomescu, D., Jacob, D., Haake, H., Grigoryev, E., Nitsch, M., Baumann, A., Quintel, M., Schott, M., ... Brunkhorst, F. M. (2019). International registry on the use of the CytoSorb® adsorber in ICU patients: Study protocol and preliminary results. MED KLIN-INTENSIVMED, 114(8), 699-707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00063-017-0342-5

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{ae419e469e684a6e8ac76594fc26cdba,
title = "International registry on the use of the CytoSorb{\textregistered} adsorber in ICU patients: Study protocol and preliminary results",
abstract = "INTRODUCTION: The aim of this clinical registry is to record the use of CytoSorb{\textregistered} adsorber device in critically ill patients under real-life conditions.METHODS: The registry records all relevant information in the course of product use, e. g., diagnosis, comorbidities, course of the condition, treatment, concomitant medication, clinical laboratory parameters, and outcome (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02312024). Primary endpoint is in-hospital mortality as compared to the mortality predicted by the APACHE II and SAPS II score, respectively.RESULTS: As of January 30, 2017, 130 centers from 22 countries were participating. Data available from the start of the registry on May 18, 2015 to November 24, 2016 (122 centers; 22 countries) were analyzed, of whom 20 centers from four countries provided data for a total of 198 patients (mean age 60.3 ± 15.1 years, 135 men [68.2%]). In all, 192 (97.0%) had 1 to 5 Cytosorb{\textregistered} adsorber applications. Sepsis was the most common indication for CytoSorb{\textregistered} treatment (135 patients). Mean APACHE II score in this group was 33.1 ± 8.4 [range 15-52] with a predicted risk of death of 78%, whereas the observed mortality was 65%. There were no significant decreases in the SOFA scores after treatment (17.2 ± 4.8 [3-24]). However interleukin-6 levels were markedly reduced after treatment (median 5000 pg/ml before and 289 pg/ml after treatment, respectively).CONCLUSIONS: This third interim report demonstrates the feasibility of the registry with excellent data quality and completeness from 20 study centers. The results must be interpreted with caution, since the numbers are still small; however the disease severity is remarkably high and suggests that adsorber treatment might be used as an ultimate treatment in life-threatening situations. There were no device-associated side effects.",
keywords = "Journal Article, Review",
author = "Sigrun Friesecke and K Tr{\"a}ger and Schittek, {G A} and Zsolt Molnar and F Bach and Klaus Kogelmann and R Bogdanski and Andreas Weyland and A Nierhaus and F Nestler and D Olboeter and D Tomescu and D Jacob and H Haake and E Grigoryev and M Nitsch and Arnd Baumann and M Quintel and Matthias Schott and Kielstein, {J T} and Andreas Meier-Hellmann and F Born and U Schumacher and M Singer and J Kellum and Brunkhorst, {Frank M}",
year = "2019",
month = nov,
doi = "10.1007/s00063-017-0342-5",
language = "English",
volume = "114",
pages = "699--707",
journal = "MED KLIN-INTENSIVMED",
issn = "2193-6218",
publisher = "Springer Medizin",
number = "8",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - International registry on the use of the CytoSorb® adsorber in ICU patients: Study protocol and preliminary results

AU - Friesecke, Sigrun

AU - Träger, K

AU - Schittek, G A

AU - Molnar, Zsolt

AU - Bach, F

AU - Kogelmann, Klaus

AU - Bogdanski, R

AU - Weyland, Andreas

AU - Nierhaus, A

AU - Nestler, F

AU - Olboeter, D

AU - Tomescu, D

AU - Jacob, D

AU - Haake, H

AU - Grigoryev, E

AU - Nitsch, M

AU - Baumann, Arnd

AU - Quintel, M

AU - Schott, Matthias

AU - Kielstein, J T

AU - Meier-Hellmann, Andreas

AU - Born, F

AU - Schumacher, U

AU - Singer, M

AU - Kellum, J

AU - Brunkhorst, Frank M

PY - 2019/11

Y1 - 2019/11

N2 - INTRODUCTION: The aim of this clinical registry is to record the use of CytoSorb® adsorber device in critically ill patients under real-life conditions.METHODS: The registry records all relevant information in the course of product use, e. g., diagnosis, comorbidities, course of the condition, treatment, concomitant medication, clinical laboratory parameters, and outcome (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02312024). Primary endpoint is in-hospital mortality as compared to the mortality predicted by the APACHE II and SAPS II score, respectively.RESULTS: As of January 30, 2017, 130 centers from 22 countries were participating. Data available from the start of the registry on May 18, 2015 to November 24, 2016 (122 centers; 22 countries) were analyzed, of whom 20 centers from four countries provided data for a total of 198 patients (mean age 60.3 ± 15.1 years, 135 men [68.2%]). In all, 192 (97.0%) had 1 to 5 Cytosorb® adsorber applications. Sepsis was the most common indication for CytoSorb® treatment (135 patients). Mean APACHE II score in this group was 33.1 ± 8.4 [range 15-52] with a predicted risk of death of 78%, whereas the observed mortality was 65%. There were no significant decreases in the SOFA scores after treatment (17.2 ± 4.8 [3-24]). However interleukin-6 levels were markedly reduced after treatment (median 5000 pg/ml before and 289 pg/ml after treatment, respectively).CONCLUSIONS: This third interim report demonstrates the feasibility of the registry with excellent data quality and completeness from 20 study centers. The results must be interpreted with caution, since the numbers are still small; however the disease severity is remarkably high and suggests that adsorber treatment might be used as an ultimate treatment in life-threatening situations. There were no device-associated side effects.

AB - INTRODUCTION: The aim of this clinical registry is to record the use of CytoSorb® adsorber device in critically ill patients under real-life conditions.METHODS: The registry records all relevant information in the course of product use, e. g., diagnosis, comorbidities, course of the condition, treatment, concomitant medication, clinical laboratory parameters, and outcome (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02312024). Primary endpoint is in-hospital mortality as compared to the mortality predicted by the APACHE II and SAPS II score, respectively.RESULTS: As of January 30, 2017, 130 centers from 22 countries were participating. Data available from the start of the registry on May 18, 2015 to November 24, 2016 (122 centers; 22 countries) were analyzed, of whom 20 centers from four countries provided data for a total of 198 patients (mean age 60.3 ± 15.1 years, 135 men [68.2%]). In all, 192 (97.0%) had 1 to 5 Cytosorb® adsorber applications. Sepsis was the most common indication for CytoSorb® treatment (135 patients). Mean APACHE II score in this group was 33.1 ± 8.4 [range 15-52] with a predicted risk of death of 78%, whereas the observed mortality was 65%. There were no significant decreases in the SOFA scores after treatment (17.2 ± 4.8 [3-24]). However interleukin-6 levels were markedly reduced after treatment (median 5000 pg/ml before and 289 pg/ml after treatment, respectively).CONCLUSIONS: This third interim report demonstrates the feasibility of the registry with excellent data quality and completeness from 20 study centers. The results must be interpreted with caution, since the numbers are still small; however the disease severity is remarkably high and suggests that adsorber treatment might be used as an ultimate treatment in life-threatening situations. There were no device-associated side effects.

KW - Journal Article

KW - Review

U2 - 10.1007/s00063-017-0342-5

DO - 10.1007/s00063-017-0342-5

M3 - SCORING: Review article

C2 - 28871441

VL - 114

SP - 699

EP - 707

JO - MED KLIN-INTENSIVMED

JF - MED KLIN-INTENSIVMED

SN - 2193-6218

IS - 8

ER -