Intentional Targeted False Lumen Occlusion after Aortic Dissection: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Standard

Intentional Targeted False Lumen Occlusion after Aortic Dissection: A Systematic Review of the Literature. / Spanos, Konstantinos; Kölbel, Tilo; Rohlffs, Fiona; Heidemann, Franziska; Giannoukas, Athanasios D; Debus, Sebastian E; Tsilimparis, Nikolaos.

In: ANN VASC SURG, Vol. 56, 04.2019, p. 317-329.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Review articleResearch

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{432593c693924fbb97cc01ed68c72e63,
title = "Intentional Targeted False Lumen Occlusion after Aortic Dissection: A Systematic Review of the Literature",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Residual patent false lumen (FL) after chronic type B aortic dissection (cTBAD) or type A aortic dissection (TAAD) treatment is independently associated with poor long-term outcomes. The aim of our study was to present endovascular techniques and the existing experience with targeted FL thrombosis after cTBAD or TAAD treatment.MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic review was performed (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) searching in MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and Cochrane databases for studies reporting on targeted FL occlusion after cTBAD or TAAD treatment.RESULTS: One hundred one patients either after open repair of a TAAD (n = 40; 3 case reports and 3 retrospective studies) or after cTBAD (n = 61; 13 case reports and 6 retrospective studies) underwent an endovascular procedure for intentional FL occlusion (2 studies reported on both procedures). Among TAAD patients, 27 of 40 (68%) had previous open repair, whereas 48 of 61 (79%) with cTBAD had a previous endovascular repair. Thirty-one (78%) patients with TAAD and fifty-one (83%) with cTBAD were treated electively. Four main techniques were used: (1) the candy-plug (19/101), (2) the knickerbocker (3/91), (3) the {"}cork in the bottle neck{"} technique (2/101), and (4) FL embolization with combined use of coils, onyx, plugs, and glue (77/101). The technical success rate was 100%, with a 30-day mortality rate of 2.5% (1/40) in TAAD and 0% in cTBAD patients. During follow-up (ranging: 2 to 63 months), the mortality rate was 0% (0/31) and 7.1% (4/61) in TAAD and cTBAD patients, respectively. The FL remained completely thrombosed in 78% (31/40) of TAAD and 62% (38/61) of cTBAD patients, whereas it was partially thrombosed in 3 and 2 patients, respectively (no report for 22 patients).CONCLUSIONS: Intentional FL occlusion seems to be a feasible less invasive approach after cTBAD or TAAD treatment, which is not broadly used. Future larger studies with longer follow-up duration may demonstrate the apparent benefit in terms of aortic remodeling or stabilization of the disease progression.",
keywords = "Aneurysm, Dissecting/diagnostic imaging, Aortic Aneurysm/diagnostic imaging, Aortography/methods, Chronic Disease, Computed Tomography Angiography, Embolization, Therapeutic/adverse effects, Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects, Humans, Postoperative Complications/etiology, Risk Factors, Thrombosis, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome",
author = "Konstantinos Spanos and Tilo K{\"o}lbel and Fiona Rohlffs and Franziska Heidemann and Giannoukas, {Athanasios D} and Debus, {Sebastian E} and Nikolaos Tsilimparis",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",
year = "2019",
month = apr,
doi = "10.1016/j.avsg.2018.08.086",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "317--329",
journal = "ANN VASC SURG",
issn = "0890-5096",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intentional Targeted False Lumen Occlusion after Aortic Dissection: A Systematic Review of the Literature

AU - Spanos, Konstantinos

AU - Kölbel, Tilo

AU - Rohlffs, Fiona

AU - Heidemann, Franziska

AU - Giannoukas, Athanasios D

AU - Debus, Sebastian E

AU - Tsilimparis, Nikolaos

N1 - Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PY - 2019/4

Y1 - 2019/4

N2 - BACKGROUND: Residual patent false lumen (FL) after chronic type B aortic dissection (cTBAD) or type A aortic dissection (TAAD) treatment is independently associated with poor long-term outcomes. The aim of our study was to present endovascular techniques and the existing experience with targeted FL thrombosis after cTBAD or TAAD treatment.MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic review was performed (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) searching in MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and Cochrane databases for studies reporting on targeted FL occlusion after cTBAD or TAAD treatment.RESULTS: One hundred one patients either after open repair of a TAAD (n = 40; 3 case reports and 3 retrospective studies) or after cTBAD (n = 61; 13 case reports and 6 retrospective studies) underwent an endovascular procedure for intentional FL occlusion (2 studies reported on both procedures). Among TAAD patients, 27 of 40 (68%) had previous open repair, whereas 48 of 61 (79%) with cTBAD had a previous endovascular repair. Thirty-one (78%) patients with TAAD and fifty-one (83%) with cTBAD were treated electively. Four main techniques were used: (1) the candy-plug (19/101), (2) the knickerbocker (3/91), (3) the "cork in the bottle neck" technique (2/101), and (4) FL embolization with combined use of coils, onyx, plugs, and glue (77/101). The technical success rate was 100%, with a 30-day mortality rate of 2.5% (1/40) in TAAD and 0% in cTBAD patients. During follow-up (ranging: 2 to 63 months), the mortality rate was 0% (0/31) and 7.1% (4/61) in TAAD and cTBAD patients, respectively. The FL remained completely thrombosed in 78% (31/40) of TAAD and 62% (38/61) of cTBAD patients, whereas it was partially thrombosed in 3 and 2 patients, respectively (no report for 22 patients).CONCLUSIONS: Intentional FL occlusion seems to be a feasible less invasive approach after cTBAD or TAAD treatment, which is not broadly used. Future larger studies with longer follow-up duration may demonstrate the apparent benefit in terms of aortic remodeling or stabilization of the disease progression.

AB - BACKGROUND: Residual patent false lumen (FL) after chronic type B aortic dissection (cTBAD) or type A aortic dissection (TAAD) treatment is independently associated with poor long-term outcomes. The aim of our study was to present endovascular techniques and the existing experience with targeted FL thrombosis after cTBAD or TAAD treatment.MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic review was performed (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) searching in MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and Cochrane databases for studies reporting on targeted FL occlusion after cTBAD or TAAD treatment.RESULTS: One hundred one patients either after open repair of a TAAD (n = 40; 3 case reports and 3 retrospective studies) or after cTBAD (n = 61; 13 case reports and 6 retrospective studies) underwent an endovascular procedure for intentional FL occlusion (2 studies reported on both procedures). Among TAAD patients, 27 of 40 (68%) had previous open repair, whereas 48 of 61 (79%) with cTBAD had a previous endovascular repair. Thirty-one (78%) patients with TAAD and fifty-one (83%) with cTBAD were treated electively. Four main techniques were used: (1) the candy-plug (19/101), (2) the knickerbocker (3/91), (3) the "cork in the bottle neck" technique (2/101), and (4) FL embolization with combined use of coils, onyx, plugs, and glue (77/101). The technical success rate was 100%, with a 30-day mortality rate of 2.5% (1/40) in TAAD and 0% in cTBAD patients. During follow-up (ranging: 2 to 63 months), the mortality rate was 0% (0/31) and 7.1% (4/61) in TAAD and cTBAD patients, respectively. The FL remained completely thrombosed in 78% (31/40) of TAAD and 62% (38/61) of cTBAD patients, whereas it was partially thrombosed in 3 and 2 patients, respectively (no report for 22 patients).CONCLUSIONS: Intentional FL occlusion seems to be a feasible less invasive approach after cTBAD or TAAD treatment, which is not broadly used. Future larger studies with longer follow-up duration may demonstrate the apparent benefit in terms of aortic remodeling or stabilization of the disease progression.

KW - Aneurysm, Dissecting/diagnostic imaging

KW - Aortic Aneurysm/diagnostic imaging

KW - Aortography/methods

KW - Chronic Disease

KW - Computed Tomography Angiography

KW - Embolization, Therapeutic/adverse effects

KW - Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects

KW - Humans

KW - Postoperative Complications/etiology

KW - Risk Factors

KW - Thrombosis

KW - Time Factors

KW - Treatment Outcome

U2 - 10.1016/j.avsg.2018.08.086

DO - 10.1016/j.avsg.2018.08.086

M3 - SCORING: Review article

C2 - 30496905

VL - 56

SP - 317

EP - 329

JO - ANN VASC SURG

JF - ANN VASC SURG

SN - 0890-5096

ER -