Initial Experience with Transradial Access for Cerebrovascular Procedures

Standard

Initial Experience with Transradial Access for Cerebrovascular Procedures : Is It Feasible and Safe? / Styczen, Hanna; Maus, Volker; Tsogkas, Ioannis; Meila, Dan; Bester, Maxim; Buhk, Jan-Hendrik; Psychogios, Marios Nikos.

In: WORLD NEUROSURG, Vol. 136, 04.2020, p. e593-e600.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{f6891d3f567345198dbb7a429834d6ad,
title = "Initial Experience with Transradial Access for Cerebrovascular Procedures: Is It Feasible and Safe?",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Despite the proven benefit of transradial access over transfemoral access in cardiac procedures, the transition for cerebrovascular procedures has only been slowly enforced. We present our experience with transradial access in cerebral diagnostic angiographies and neurointerventional procedures.METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent transradial access for cerebrovascular procedures in 3 German centers between February 2017 and May 2019. Demographics, technical features, and complications were evaluated.RESULTS: Transradial access was successful in 40/45 endovascular procedures (89%). Selected catheterization of the intended vessels was obtained in 95% of cases (40/42). The rate of procedure-related vascular complications was 2% (1/45).CONCLUSIONS: In this small retrospective series, transradial access proved to be safe and efficient. In the future, it is planned to further promote it as a standard access alternative for more patients.",
author = "Hanna Styczen and Volker Maus and Ioannis Tsogkas and Dan Meila and Maxim Bester and Jan-Hendrik Buhk and Psychogios, {Marios Nikos}",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",
year = "2020",
month = apr,
doi = "10.1016/j.wneu.2020.01.078",
language = "English",
volume = "136",
pages = "e593--e600",
journal = "WORLD NEUROSURG",
issn = "1878-8750",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Initial Experience with Transradial Access for Cerebrovascular Procedures

T2 - Is It Feasible and Safe?

AU - Styczen, Hanna

AU - Maus, Volker

AU - Tsogkas, Ioannis

AU - Meila, Dan

AU - Bester, Maxim

AU - Buhk, Jan-Hendrik

AU - Psychogios, Marios Nikos

N1 - Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PY - 2020/4

Y1 - 2020/4

N2 - BACKGROUND: Despite the proven benefit of transradial access over transfemoral access in cardiac procedures, the transition for cerebrovascular procedures has only been slowly enforced. We present our experience with transradial access in cerebral diagnostic angiographies and neurointerventional procedures.METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent transradial access for cerebrovascular procedures in 3 German centers between February 2017 and May 2019. Demographics, technical features, and complications were evaluated.RESULTS: Transradial access was successful in 40/45 endovascular procedures (89%). Selected catheterization of the intended vessels was obtained in 95% of cases (40/42). The rate of procedure-related vascular complications was 2% (1/45).CONCLUSIONS: In this small retrospective series, transradial access proved to be safe and efficient. In the future, it is planned to further promote it as a standard access alternative for more patients.

AB - BACKGROUND: Despite the proven benefit of transradial access over transfemoral access in cardiac procedures, the transition for cerebrovascular procedures has only been slowly enforced. We present our experience with transradial access in cerebral diagnostic angiographies and neurointerventional procedures.METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent transradial access for cerebrovascular procedures in 3 German centers between February 2017 and May 2019. Demographics, technical features, and complications were evaluated.RESULTS: Transradial access was successful in 40/45 endovascular procedures (89%). Selected catheterization of the intended vessels was obtained in 95% of cases (40/42). The rate of procedure-related vascular complications was 2% (1/45).CONCLUSIONS: In this small retrospective series, transradial access proved to be safe and efficient. In the future, it is planned to further promote it as a standard access alternative for more patients.

U2 - 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.01.078

DO - 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.01.078

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 31958588

VL - 136

SP - e593-e600

JO - WORLD NEUROSURG

JF - WORLD NEUROSURG

SN - 1878-8750

ER -