[In Process Citation]

Standard

[In Process Citation]. / Raabe, A; Dubben, HH; Beck-Bornholdt, Hans-Peter.

In: STRAHLENTHER ONKOL, Vol. 176, No. 11, 11, 2000, p. 491-497.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Raabe, A, Dubben, HH & Beck-Bornholdt, H-P 2000, '[In Process Citation]', STRAHLENTHER ONKOL, vol. 176, no. 11, 11, pp. 491-497. <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11116556?dopt=Citation>

APA

Raabe, A., Dubben, HH., & Beck-Bornholdt, H-P. (2000). [In Process Citation]. STRAHLENTHER ONKOL, 176(11), 491-497. [11]. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11116556?dopt=Citation

Vancouver

Raabe A, Dubben HH, Beck-Bornholdt H-P. [In Process Citation]. STRAHLENTHER ONKOL. 2000;176(11):491-497. 11.

Bibtex

@article{9bbc1fd3d3604f288d766fb8c4d850ef,
title = "[In Process Citation]",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: The statistical quality of the contributions||| to {"}Strahlentherapie und Onkologie{"} is assessed, aiming for improvement of the||| journal and consequently its impact factor. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All 181||| articles published during 1998 and 1999 in the categories {"}review{"}, {"}original||| contribution{"}, and {"}short communication{"} were analyzed concerning the||| appropriate consideration of Type II error. RESULT: Ninety-nine publications||| were excluded from analysis for different specified reasons. In none of the||| remaining 82 clinical publications Type II error was considered. CONCLUSION:||| Authors, peer reviewers, and editors could contribute to improve the quality of||| the journal by setting value on adequate consideration of Type II||| error.",
author = "A Raabe and HH Dubben and Hans-Peter Beck-Bornholdt",
year = "2000",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "176",
pages = "491--497",
journal = "STRAHLENTHER ONKOL",
issn = "0179-7158",
publisher = "Urban und Vogel",
number = "11",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - [In Process Citation]

AU - Raabe, A

AU - Dubben, HH

AU - Beck-Bornholdt, Hans-Peter

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - BACKGROUND: The statistical quality of the contributions||| to "Strahlentherapie und Onkologie" is assessed, aiming for improvement of the||| journal and consequently its impact factor. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All 181||| articles published during 1998 and 1999 in the categories "review", "original||| contribution", and "short communication" were analyzed concerning the||| appropriate consideration of Type II error. RESULT: Ninety-nine publications||| were excluded from analysis for different specified reasons. In none of the||| remaining 82 clinical publications Type II error was considered. CONCLUSION:||| Authors, peer reviewers, and editors could contribute to improve the quality of||| the journal by setting value on adequate consideration of Type II||| error.

AB - BACKGROUND: The statistical quality of the contributions||| to "Strahlentherapie und Onkologie" is assessed, aiming for improvement of the||| journal and consequently its impact factor. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All 181||| articles published during 1998 and 1999 in the categories "review", "original||| contribution", and "short communication" were analyzed concerning the||| appropriate consideration of Type II error. RESULT: Ninety-nine publications||| were excluded from analysis for different specified reasons. In none of the||| remaining 82 clinical publications Type II error was considered. CONCLUSION:||| Authors, peer reviewers, and editors could contribute to improve the quality of||| the journal by setting value on adequate consideration of Type II||| error.

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

VL - 176

SP - 491

EP - 497

JO - STRAHLENTHER ONKOL

JF - STRAHLENTHER ONKOL

SN - 0179-7158

IS - 11

M1 - 11

ER -