Implicit approach and avoidance in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder

Standard

Implicit approach and avoidance in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder. / Cludius, Barbara; Külz, Anne Katrin; Landmann, Sarah; Moritz, Steffen; Wittekind, Charlotte E.

In: J ABNORM PSYCHOL, Vol. 126, No. 6, 08.2017, p. 761-773.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Cludius, B, Külz, AK, Landmann, S, Moritz, S & Wittekind, CE 2017, 'Implicit approach and avoidance in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder', J ABNORM PSYCHOL, vol. 126, no. 6, pp. 761-773. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000269

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{364f5a5dae5e45f1b1c602a71bfff663,
title = "Implicit approach and avoidance in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder",
abstract = "Avoidance is regarded as an important feature for the development and maintenance of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and is usually assessed using explicit measures such as self-report scales. However, some behavioral schemata are unavailable to introspection, making them partially inaccessible by explicit measures. We used an approach-avoidance task (AAT) as an implicit measure to examine behavioral tendencies in patients with OCD, including patients with checking- and contamination-related symptoms (n = 63), compared with a healthy control group (n = 30). Participants were asked to respond to the color of a stimulus or stimulus frame by pulling a joystick toward themselves or by pushing it away. The stimuli were comprised of checking-related, contamination-related, and neutral pictures and words. Patients with contamination-related symptoms were slower when responding to OCD-related stimuli, independent of approach or avoidance. Unexpectedly, patients with checking-related symptoms were faster at pulling (approaching) and slower at pushing (avoiding) checking-related material compared with neutral stimuli. The slower pushing (avoiding) of checking-related compared with neutral material correlated positively with explicit ratings of avoidance. These results suggest a biased approach-avoidance tendency in patients with checking-related symptoms of OCD, but not in those with contamination-related symptoms of OCD. Future studies are necessary to assess whether the AAT might be useful in the assessment of treatment gains as well as whether it might be a training tool to enhance psychotherapeutic changes in OCD. (PsycINFO Database Record",
keywords = "Journal Article",
author = "Barbara Cludius and K{\"u}lz, {Anne Katrin} and Sarah Landmann and Steffen Moritz and Wittekind, {Charlotte E}",
note = "(c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved).",
year = "2017",
month = aug,
doi = "10.1037/abn0000269",
language = "English",
volume = "126",
pages = "761--773",
journal = "J ABNORM PSYCHOL",
issn = "0021-843X",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implicit approach and avoidance in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder

AU - Cludius, Barbara

AU - Külz, Anne Katrin

AU - Landmann, Sarah

AU - Moritz, Steffen

AU - Wittekind, Charlotte E

N1 - (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved).

PY - 2017/8

Y1 - 2017/8

N2 - Avoidance is regarded as an important feature for the development and maintenance of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and is usually assessed using explicit measures such as self-report scales. However, some behavioral schemata are unavailable to introspection, making them partially inaccessible by explicit measures. We used an approach-avoidance task (AAT) as an implicit measure to examine behavioral tendencies in patients with OCD, including patients with checking- and contamination-related symptoms (n = 63), compared with a healthy control group (n = 30). Participants were asked to respond to the color of a stimulus or stimulus frame by pulling a joystick toward themselves or by pushing it away. The stimuli were comprised of checking-related, contamination-related, and neutral pictures and words. Patients with contamination-related symptoms were slower when responding to OCD-related stimuli, independent of approach or avoidance. Unexpectedly, patients with checking-related symptoms were faster at pulling (approaching) and slower at pushing (avoiding) checking-related material compared with neutral stimuli. The slower pushing (avoiding) of checking-related compared with neutral material correlated positively with explicit ratings of avoidance. These results suggest a biased approach-avoidance tendency in patients with checking-related symptoms of OCD, but not in those with contamination-related symptoms of OCD. Future studies are necessary to assess whether the AAT might be useful in the assessment of treatment gains as well as whether it might be a training tool to enhance psychotherapeutic changes in OCD. (PsycINFO Database Record

AB - Avoidance is regarded as an important feature for the development and maintenance of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and is usually assessed using explicit measures such as self-report scales. However, some behavioral schemata are unavailable to introspection, making them partially inaccessible by explicit measures. We used an approach-avoidance task (AAT) as an implicit measure to examine behavioral tendencies in patients with OCD, including patients with checking- and contamination-related symptoms (n = 63), compared with a healthy control group (n = 30). Participants were asked to respond to the color of a stimulus or stimulus frame by pulling a joystick toward themselves or by pushing it away. The stimuli were comprised of checking-related, contamination-related, and neutral pictures and words. Patients with contamination-related symptoms were slower when responding to OCD-related stimuli, independent of approach or avoidance. Unexpectedly, patients with checking-related symptoms were faster at pulling (approaching) and slower at pushing (avoiding) checking-related material compared with neutral stimuli. The slower pushing (avoiding) of checking-related compared with neutral material correlated positively with explicit ratings of avoidance. These results suggest a biased approach-avoidance tendency in patients with checking-related symptoms of OCD, but not in those with contamination-related symptoms of OCD. Future studies are necessary to assess whether the AAT might be useful in the assessment of treatment gains as well as whether it might be a training tool to enhance psychotherapeutic changes in OCD. (PsycINFO Database Record

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1037/abn0000269

DO - 10.1037/abn0000269

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 28425736

VL - 126

SP - 761

EP - 773

JO - J ABNORM PSYCHOL

JF - J ABNORM PSYCHOL

SN - 0021-843X

IS - 6

ER -