Implications of the Network Theory for the Treatment of Mental Disorders

Standard

Implications of the Network Theory for the Treatment of Mental Disorders : A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. / Schumacher, Lea; Klein, Jan Philipp; Elsaesser, Moritz; Härter, Martin; Hautzinger, Martin; Schramm, Elisabeth; Kriston, Levente.

In: JAMA PSYCHIAT, Vol. 80, No. 11, 01.11.2023, p. 1160-1168.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{9b8454c8a0a94799bf4f07f2aa0ee581,
title = "Implications of the Network Theory for the Treatment of Mental Disorders: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial",
abstract = "IMPORTANCE: Conceptualizing mental disorders as latent entities has been challenged by the network theory of mental disorders, which states that psychological problems are constituted by a network of mutually interacting symptoms. While the implications of the network approach for planning and evaluating treatments have been intensively discussed, empirical support for the claims of the network theory regarding treatment effects is lacking.OBJECTIVE: To assess the extent to which specific hypotheses derived from the network theory regarding the (interindividual) changeability of symptom dynamics in response to treatment align with empirical data.DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This secondary analysis entails data from a multisite randomized clinical trial, in which 254 patients with chronic depression reported on their depressive symptoms at every treatment session. Data collection was conducted between March 5, 2010, and October 14, 2013, and this analysis was conducted between November 1, 2021, and May 31, 2022.INTERVENTION: Thirty-two sessions of either disorder-specific or nonspecific psychotherapy for chronic depression.MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Longitudinal associations of depressive symptoms with each other and change of these associations through treatment estimated by a time-varying longitudinal network model.RESULTS: In a sample of 254 participants (166 [65.4%] women; mean [SD] age, 44.9 [11.9] years), symptom interactions changed through treatment, and this change varied across treatments and individuals. The mean absolute (ie, valence-ignorant) strength of symptom interactions (logarithmic odds ratio scale) increased from 0.40 (95% CI, 0.36-0.44) to 0.60 (95% CI, 0.52-0.70) during nonspecific psychotherapy and to 0.56 (95% CI, 0.48-0.64) during disorder-specific psychotherapy. In contrast, the mean raw (ie, valence-sensitive) strength of symptom interactions decreased from 0.32 (95% CI, 0.28-0.36) to 0.26 (95% CI, 0.20-0.32) and to 0.09 (95% CI, 0.02-0.16), respectively. Changing symptom severity could be explained to a large extent by symptom interactions.CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These findings suggest that specific treatment-related hypotheses of the network theory align well with empirical data. Conceptualizing mental disorders as symptom networks and treatments as measures that aim to change these networks is expected to give further insights into the working mechanisms of mental health treatments, leading to the improvement of current and the development of new treatments.TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00970437.",
author = "Lea Schumacher and Klein, {Jan Philipp} and Moritz Elsaesser and Martin H{\"a}rter and Martin Hautzinger and Elisabeth Schramm and Levente Kriston",
year = "2023",
month = nov,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2023.2823",
language = "English",
volume = "80",
pages = "1160--1168",
journal = "JAMA PSYCHIAT",
issn = "2168-622X",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "11",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implications of the Network Theory for the Treatment of Mental Disorders

T2 - A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial

AU - Schumacher, Lea

AU - Klein, Jan Philipp

AU - Elsaesser, Moritz

AU - Härter, Martin

AU - Hautzinger, Martin

AU - Schramm, Elisabeth

AU - Kriston, Levente

PY - 2023/11/1

Y1 - 2023/11/1

N2 - IMPORTANCE: Conceptualizing mental disorders as latent entities has been challenged by the network theory of mental disorders, which states that psychological problems are constituted by a network of mutually interacting symptoms. While the implications of the network approach for planning and evaluating treatments have been intensively discussed, empirical support for the claims of the network theory regarding treatment effects is lacking.OBJECTIVE: To assess the extent to which specific hypotheses derived from the network theory regarding the (interindividual) changeability of symptom dynamics in response to treatment align with empirical data.DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This secondary analysis entails data from a multisite randomized clinical trial, in which 254 patients with chronic depression reported on their depressive symptoms at every treatment session. Data collection was conducted between March 5, 2010, and October 14, 2013, and this analysis was conducted between November 1, 2021, and May 31, 2022.INTERVENTION: Thirty-two sessions of either disorder-specific or nonspecific psychotherapy for chronic depression.MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Longitudinal associations of depressive symptoms with each other and change of these associations through treatment estimated by a time-varying longitudinal network model.RESULTS: In a sample of 254 participants (166 [65.4%] women; mean [SD] age, 44.9 [11.9] years), symptom interactions changed through treatment, and this change varied across treatments and individuals. The mean absolute (ie, valence-ignorant) strength of symptom interactions (logarithmic odds ratio scale) increased from 0.40 (95% CI, 0.36-0.44) to 0.60 (95% CI, 0.52-0.70) during nonspecific psychotherapy and to 0.56 (95% CI, 0.48-0.64) during disorder-specific psychotherapy. In contrast, the mean raw (ie, valence-sensitive) strength of symptom interactions decreased from 0.32 (95% CI, 0.28-0.36) to 0.26 (95% CI, 0.20-0.32) and to 0.09 (95% CI, 0.02-0.16), respectively. Changing symptom severity could be explained to a large extent by symptom interactions.CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These findings suggest that specific treatment-related hypotheses of the network theory align well with empirical data. Conceptualizing mental disorders as symptom networks and treatments as measures that aim to change these networks is expected to give further insights into the working mechanisms of mental health treatments, leading to the improvement of current and the development of new treatments.TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00970437.

AB - IMPORTANCE: Conceptualizing mental disorders as latent entities has been challenged by the network theory of mental disorders, which states that psychological problems are constituted by a network of mutually interacting symptoms. While the implications of the network approach for planning and evaluating treatments have been intensively discussed, empirical support for the claims of the network theory regarding treatment effects is lacking.OBJECTIVE: To assess the extent to which specific hypotheses derived from the network theory regarding the (interindividual) changeability of symptom dynamics in response to treatment align with empirical data.DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This secondary analysis entails data from a multisite randomized clinical trial, in which 254 patients with chronic depression reported on their depressive symptoms at every treatment session. Data collection was conducted between March 5, 2010, and October 14, 2013, and this analysis was conducted between November 1, 2021, and May 31, 2022.INTERVENTION: Thirty-two sessions of either disorder-specific or nonspecific psychotherapy for chronic depression.MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Longitudinal associations of depressive symptoms with each other and change of these associations through treatment estimated by a time-varying longitudinal network model.RESULTS: In a sample of 254 participants (166 [65.4%] women; mean [SD] age, 44.9 [11.9] years), symptom interactions changed through treatment, and this change varied across treatments and individuals. The mean absolute (ie, valence-ignorant) strength of symptom interactions (logarithmic odds ratio scale) increased from 0.40 (95% CI, 0.36-0.44) to 0.60 (95% CI, 0.52-0.70) during nonspecific psychotherapy and to 0.56 (95% CI, 0.48-0.64) during disorder-specific psychotherapy. In contrast, the mean raw (ie, valence-sensitive) strength of symptom interactions decreased from 0.32 (95% CI, 0.28-0.36) to 0.26 (95% CI, 0.20-0.32) and to 0.09 (95% CI, 0.02-0.16), respectively. Changing symptom severity could be explained to a large extent by symptom interactions.CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These findings suggest that specific treatment-related hypotheses of the network theory align well with empirical data. Conceptualizing mental disorders as symptom networks and treatments as measures that aim to change these networks is expected to give further insights into the working mechanisms of mental health treatments, leading to the improvement of current and the development of new treatments.TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00970437.

U2 - 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2023.2823

DO - 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2023.2823

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 37610747

VL - 80

SP - 1160

EP - 1168

JO - JAMA PSYCHIAT

JF - JAMA PSYCHIAT

SN - 2168-622X

IS - 11

ER -